Riemannian foliations and quasifolds
Mathematische Zeitschrift
(2024) 308:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-024-03595-5
Mathematische Zeitschrift
Riemannian foliations and quasifolds
Yi Lin1 · David Miyamoto2
Received: 8 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 August 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
Abstract
It is well known that, by the Reeb stability theorem, the leaf space of a Riemannian foliation
with compact leaves is an orbifold. We prove that, under mild completeness conditions, the
leaf space of a Killing Riemannian foliation is a diffeological quasifold: as a diffeological
space, it is locally modelled by quotients of Cartesian space by countable groups acting
affinely. Furthermore, we prove that the holonomy groupoid of the foliation is, locally, Morita
equivalent to the action groupoid of a countable group acting affinely on Cartesian space.
Keywords Riemannian foliation · Quasifolds · Molino theory · Diffeology
Mathematics Subject Classification 57S25 · 57R91
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Quasifolds as diffeological spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 Transverse geometric structures on foliations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 Review of Riemannian foliations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 The leaf space of a developable foliation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 The leaf space of a Killing foliation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 Diffeological quasifolds as leaf spaces of foliations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 Introduction
A regular foliation of a manifold M is a partition F of M into submanifolds of a fixed
dimension, called leaves, which fit together smoothly. To study the differential geometry of
the leaf space M/F , an immediate obstacle is whereas M and F are smooth, the leaf space
M/F is rarely a manifold. For instance, consider the foliation (M, F ) of an open Möbius
strip, where M is formed by gluing the vertical edges of the square [−1, 1] × (−1, 1) with
B David Miyamoto
Yi Lin
1
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
2
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany
0123456789().: V,-vol
123
49
Page 2 of 32
Y. Lin, D. Miyamoto
a half twist, and where the leaves are the projections of horizontal lines. Then the leaf space
is homeomorphic to (−1, 1)/Z2 , which has a singularity at the origin. Nevertheless, the leaf
space of a foliation always admits the structure of a diffeology, a generalized smooth structure
on a set introduced by Souriau [22]. Indeed, a diffeology propagates nicely to quotients of
manifolds, and allows a clean and precise notion of “local model” for singular spaces. For
example, this is the case for orbifolds, which are spaces that are locally modelled by quotients
of Cartesian space Rn by smooth actions of finite groups. It is not difficult to show the leaf
space of our foliation of the Möbius strip is diffeologically diffeomorphic to the orbifold
(−1, 1)/Z2 . More generally, the Reeb stability theorem implies:
Theorem 1.1 If (M, F ) is a foliation, and every leaf is compact with finite holonomy, then
M/F is an orbifold.
The requirement of finite holonomy is subtle, but automatic if F has compact leaves and
is Riemannian, meaning M admits a Riemannian metric compatible with F . In this case:
Corollary 1.2 The leaf space of a Riemannian foliation with compact leaves is an orbifold.
The compactness requirement is necessary. As a counterexample, consider a Kronecker
foliation induced by irrational flows on a 2-torus. This foliation is Riemannian, but its leaf
space is non-Hausdorff and is not an orbifold. Nevertheless, the leaf space of a Kronecker
foliation carries the structure of a quasifold, spaces introduced by Prato [18, 19] in order
to generalize the Delzant construction in toric geometry to simple non-rational polytopes.
Quasifolds are locally modelled by quotients of Cartesian spaces Rn by smooth affine actions
of countable groups, and fit naturally in the category of diffeological spaces, cf. [11, 12].
In this article, we show that the leaf spaces of Killing Riemannian foliations are diffeological quasifolds. The definition of a Killing Riemannian foliation is rather complicated
(see Sect. 4.1), so here we give three examples: Riemannian foliations on simply-connected
manifolds are Killing; foliations of compact Riemannian manifolds whose leaves are orbits
of connected Lie subgroups of isometries are Killing; and finally, Battaglia and Zaffran [3]
show that every toric symplectic quasifold is equivariantly symplectomorphic to the leaf
space of a Killing foliation.1 We prove:
Theorem 1.3 If (M, F ) is a complete Killing foliation of a connected manifold M, with
complete transverse action of its structure algebra, then M/F is a diffeological quasifold.
Lie groupoids give an alternative approach to transverse geometry. Specifically, we have
the holonomy groupoid Hol(F ) of a foliation (M, F ). For Killing foliations, we have:
Corollary 1.4 In the setting of Theorem 1.3, Hol(F ) is, locally, Morita equivalent to the action
groupoids of countable groups acting affinely on a Cartesian space.
These are Theorem 6.2 and Corollary 6.3 in this article, respectively. To prove these
results, we show that any complete Killing foliation is locally developable, and then apply a
description of leaf spaces of developable foliations worked out in Propositions 5.3 and 5.7.
To show local develop-ability, we use Molino’s structure theory for Riemannian foliations
(see [16] and Sect. 4), and specifically Fedida’s Theorem 5.12 for complete Lie-g foliations.
We emphasize that our local models are quotients of Cartesian spaces by countable groups
1 More precisely, they show the relevant foliation is Riemannian, but mention that a careful reading of their
proof also shows it is Killing.
123
Riemannian foliations and quasifolds
Page 3 of 32
49
acting affinely, and thus we consider our result a form of “affinization”. It is distinct from the
usual linearization of proper Lie group actions (or proper Lie groupoids), which are known
to be locally isomorphic to the action of the isotropy groups on the normal space to an orbit.
For example, in Example 6.4, we apply Theorem 6.2 to conclude that the leaf space of a
Kronecker foliation with angle λ is the quotient of R by the subgroup Z + λZ, whereas if we
attempt to linearize its holonomy groupoid like a proper groupoid, we get a trivial groupoid.
Haefliger [7] gave a model for complete pseudogroups of isometries which, when applied
to the holonomy pseudogroup of a complete Killing Riemannian foliation, achieves a result of
a (...truncated)