Correction: Impact loading exercise induced osteogenesis from childhood to early adulthood in tennis players aged 8–30 years
European Journal of Applied Physiology (2025) 125:937–939
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05741-1
CORRECTION
Correction: Impact loading exercise induced osteogenesis
from childhood to early adulthood in tennis players aged 8–30 years
George Vagenas1
· Dimitria Palaiothodorou1
Published online: 20 March 2025
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025
Correction: European Journal of Applied Physiology
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05681-2
Table 1 which previously appeared as
In the original version of this article, part of Table 1 caption
was wrongly included in the table footnote and three major
column width was unequal.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00421-024-05681-2.
B
George Vagenas
Dimitria Palaiothodorou
1
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
123
123
1%
7%
18%
11%
2%
17%
3%
41%
- 0.16 (0.963)
4.51 (0.167)
0.65 (0.009)
6.04 (0.029)
2.95 (0.381)
5.21 (0.084)
0.056 (0.989)
–
5.47 (0.276)
3%
12%
43%
17%
2%
14%
9%
–
LMG
4.66 (0.068)
5.04 (0.080)
0.63 (0.002)
5.44 (0.017)
5.54 (0.046)
12.62 (< 0.001)
11.69 (0.002)
–
−9.67 (0.017)
b (Prob.)
Model 3 (BA)
N 25, Wald 48,
R2 67%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 33–64%
5%
2%
19%
12%
5%
48%
8%
LMG
on bone trait, maturity status, sex, weekly training, and bone segment b regression coefficient, Prob. error probability; LMG relative predictor importance (% of R2 ); Starting age was not a
moderator due to its lack of theoretical and empirical correlation (r < 0.1) with the dependent variable (% bone asymmetry) for this age span (8–30 years)
4.67 (0.046)
1.87 (0.410)
RadioUlnar
0.602 (< 0.001)
Humeral
Bone Segment
Hours (h/w)
Weekly training
Boys vs Girls
6.17 (0.001)
4.23 (0.073)
3. Post-Pubertal
Sex Effect
4.73 (0.099)
8.47 (< 0.001)
2. Peri-Pubertal
8.75 (< 0.001)
3.13 (0.359)
b (Prob.)
b (Prob.)
LMG
Model 2 (BMC)
N 35, Wald 27,
R2 38%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 40–75%
Model 1 (BMC & BA)
N 60, Wald 85,
R2 56%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 37–97%
1. Children
Maturity status (players)
BMC vs BA
Bone trait
Constant
Predictors
Factors
Table 1 “Random Effects Model” meta-regression of loaded bones hypertrophy (% asymmetry)
938
European Journal of Applied Physiology (2025) 125:937–939
European Journal of Applied Physiology (2025) 125:937–939
939
and should have appeared as shown below
Table 1 “Random Effects Model” meta-regression of loaded bones hypertrophy (% asymmetry) on bone trait, maturity status, sex, weekly training,
and bone segment
Model 1 (BMC & BA)
N 60, Wald 85,
R2 56%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 37–97%
Factors
b (Prob.)
Model 2 (BMC)
N 35, Wald 27,
R2 38%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 40–75%
LMG
b (Prob.)
Model 3 (BA)
N 25, Wald 48,
R2 67%, p < 0.001,
Tolerance: 33–64%
LMG
b (Prob.)
LMG
Predictors
Constant
3.13 (0.359)
−9.67 (0.017)
5.47 (0.276)
Bone trait
BMC vs BA
8.75 (< 0.001)
41%
–
–
–
Maturity status (players)
1. Children
4.73 (0.099)
3%
0.056 (0.989)
9%
11.69 (0.002)
8%
2. Peri-Pubertal
8.47 (< 0.001)
17%
5.21 (0.084)
14%
12.62 (< 0.001)
48%
3. Post-Pubertal
4.23 (0.073)
2%
2.95 (0.381)
2%
5.54 (0.046)
5%
6.17 (0.001)
11%
6.04 (0.029)
17%
5.44 (0.017)
12%
0.602 (< 0.001)
18%
0.65 (0.009)
43%
0.63 (0.002)
19%
Humeral
4.67 (0.046)
7%
4.51 (0.167)
12%
5.04 (0.080)
2%
RadioUlnar
1.87 (0.410)
1%
− 0.16 (0.963)
3%
4.66 (0.068)
5%
Sex Effect
Boys vs Girls
Weekly training
Hours (h/w)
Bone Segment
b regression coefficient, Prob. error probability; LMG relative predictor importance (% of
Starting age was not a moderator due to its
lack of theoretical and empirical correlation (r < 0.1) with the dependent variable (% bone asymmetry) for this age span (8–30 years)
R2 );
123
(...truncated)
