The value of first trimester inflammatory indices in predicting the development of preeclampsia in the third trimester
Sahin et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
(2025) 25:713
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07836-1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Open Access
RESEARCH
The value of first trimester inflammatory
indices in predicting the development
of preeclampsia in the third trimester
Refaettin Sahin1* , Cem Inceoglu1
and Veysel Tahiroglu1,2
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of hematologic inflammatory markers measured during
the first trimester for developing preeclampsia in the third trimester.
Methods This retrospective study included 192 pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia and 159 healthy
pregnant women who presented to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of Sİrnak State Hospital between March
2024 and March 2025. Demographic data, obstetric history, and laboratory results were retrospectively analyzed.
Inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count parameters—including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte
ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation
index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)—were
compared between the two groups.
Results The mean age in the preeclampsia group was significantly higher (p = 0.002), while gestational age at
delivery and birth weight were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell
count, and inflammatory markers such as NLR, SII, SIRI, and AISI were significantly lower in the preeclampsia group
(p < 0.05). Monocyte counts were also significantly lower (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were
observed between the groups regarding PLR and LMR.
Conclusion Certain hematological inflammatory markers measured in the first trimester may serve as potential
biomarkers for predicting the development of preeclampsia. Incorporating these markers into routine prenatal
follow-up could contribute to the early identification of high-risk pregnancies.
Trial registration This study was not registered in a trial registry as it is a retrospective observational study involving
analysis of previously collected data.
Keywords Preeclampsia, Inflammatory markers, Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), Neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), Maternal outcomes
*Correspondence:
Refaettin Sahin
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sirnak State Hospital, Sirnak,
Turkey
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Sirnak University,
Sirnak, Turkey
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you
give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the
licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creati
vecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Sahin et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
(2025) 25:713
Introduction
Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication
characterized by new-onset hypertension with either
proteinuria or end-organ dysfunction after 20 weeks of
gestation [1]. It affects approximately 2–8% of all pregnancies worldwide and remains one of the leading causes
of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [1].
Although the exact pathogenesis of preeclampsia is
not fully understood, placental ischemia, endothelial
dysfunction, and systemic inflammation are considered
major contributing factors [2]. Inadequate remodeling of the spiral arteries is thought to impair placental
perfusion, leading to hypoxia, oxidative stress, and the
increased release of anti-angiogenic factors [3].
These pathophysiological changes result in clinical
manifestations such as hypertension, proteinuria, and
other signs of organ dysfunction [4]. Genetic predisposition, immune system dysregulation, and environmental
factors may also contribute to the development of the
disease [5].
Recent studies have highlighted the central role of systemic inflammation in the development of preeclampsia.
Hematologic inflammatory indices—such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR),
systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic
inflammatory response index (SIRI), and pan-immuneinflammation value (PIV)—have attracted attention as
accessible and cost-effective biomarkers for predicting
preeclampsia [6].
Although the clinical manifestations of preeclampsia typically appear in the later stages of pregnancy, it is
well established that the underlying pathophysiologic
processes begin much earlier. Therefore, analyzing laboratory data from the first trimester may be valuable for
identifying high-risk pregnancies and initiating early
interventions. However, the existing literature in this area
remains limited and includes some contradictory findings [7].
This study aimed to investigate whether first-trimester
hematological inflammatory markers could predict the
subsequent development of preeclampsia and to contribute to the limited body of literature on this topic by identifying easily obtainable, potential early biomarkers for
use in routine clinical practice.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic of Sirnak State Hospital
between March 2024 and March 2025. Ethical approval
was obtained from the Sirnak University Ethics Committee (Approval No: E-74546226-050.04-130513), and the
study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration
of Helsinki.
Page 2 of 6
The study population consisted of pregnant women
who underwent complete blood count (CBC) analysis
during the first trimester and delivered in the third trimester. Data were retrospectively retrieved from the
hospital’s electronic medical records and included demographic characteristics, obstetric history, laboratory findings, and delivery outcomes.
A total of 351 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 192 were diagnosed with preeclampsia
based on the 2020 diagnostic criteria of the American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) [1],
while 159 women with uneventful pregnancies constituted the control group. Patients with chronic illnesses,
autoimmune diseases, infectious c (...truncated)