Improvement in dielectric and mechanical performance of CaCu3.1Ti4O12.1 by addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles
Chompoonuch Puchmark
1
Gobwute Rujijanagul
0
0
Department of Physics and Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University
, Chiang Mai, 50200,
Thailand
1
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University
, Phitsanulok, 65000,
Thailand
The properties of CaCu3.1Ti4O12.1 [CC3.1TO] ceramics with the addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles, prepared via a solidstate reaction technique, were investigated. The nanoparticle additive was found to inhibit grain growth with the average grain size decreasing from approximately 7.5 m for CC3.1TO to approximately 2.0 m for the unmodified samples, while the Knoop hardness value was found to improve with a maximum value of 9.8 GPa for the 1 vol.% Al2O3 sample. A very high dielectric constant > 60,000 with a low loss tangent (approximately 0.09) was observed for the 0.5 vol.% Al2O3 sample at 1 kHz and at room temperature. These data suggest that nanocomposites have a great potential for dielectric applications.
-
Background
CaCu3Ti4O12 [CCTO] is an interesting dielectric material
which exhibits a high dielectric constant over 10,000 at
room temperature and shows temperature independence
over the temperature range from approximately 100 to
400 K [1-3]. Since the discovery of this material by
Subramanian et al. [1], CCTO has been widely studied to
further understand and improve its properties. The
CCTO crystal has a cubic symmetry with an Im3 space
group. In the CCTO lattice, the TiO6 octahedra are tilted
which results in a doubling of the perovskite-like
structure, involved in the planar square arrangement of the
oxygen around the copper ions [4]. The CCTO ceramics
exhibit an electrically heterogeneous structure involving
mobile-charged species in terms of the Maxwell-Wagner
relaxation [5]. Internal interfaces in the polycrystalline
CCTO give rise to the polarization in the insulating grain
boundary and at the semiconducting grains which is well
explained by the internal barrier layer capacitor [IBLC]
model [6,7]. To improve the dielectric properties further,
many cations have been introduced into CCTO,
including Co, Zr, Fe, Sc, and Nb on the B site and substitution
of La and Eu at the A site [4,8-12]. Although some of
these additives resulted in a reduction of the loss tangent,
most additives also reduced the dielectric constant. Fang
et al. proposed that Cu stoichiometry can affect the
electrical properties of the CCTO ceramics, [13] while Kwon
et al. reported that both Cu- and Ti-deficient CCTO
presented a higher dielectric constant than undoped CCTO
[14]. Recently, many authors have reported on the
properties of composites between CCTO and other materials
such as BaTiO3, SrTiO3, ZnNb2O6, and polystyrene
[15-17]. However, the properties of composites formed
by adding nanocomposites to CCTO have still not been
widely investigated. In the present work, a new
nanocomposite system between CCTO (with non-stoichiometric
composition) and Al2O3 nanoparticles was fabricated.
We demonstrate that the dielectric behavior of the
composites can be significantly improved by the addition of
these nanoparticles. Some other properties of the
nanocomposites were also investigated and reported.
Experimental procedure
It has been proposed that Cu stoichiometry is related to
the dielectric response [13,14]. Fang et al. [13] reported
that Cu-excessive CCTO samples showed improved
densification and dielectric behaviors. In the present
work, Cu-excessive CCTO ceramics in a composition
of CaCu3.1Ti4O12.1 [CC3.1TO] were fabricated. Our
studies indicate that this composition exhibited a good
densification and dielectric response (data not shown).
The samples were fabricated using the solid-state
mixed oxide method. Reagent grade CaCO3, CuO, and
TiO2 powders were used as starting materials. The
mixture of these powders was ground for 24 h in
ethanol using zirconia grinding media. The suspension was
then dried and subsequently calcined at 900C for 8 h
with a heating rate of 5C/min. The calcined CC3.1TO
powders were mixed with (0.5, 1, and 2 vol.%) Al2O3
nanoparticles (40 nm average particle size) and 1%
polyvinyl alcohol [PVA] binder and were ball-milled in
ethanol for 12 h using the same method as mentioned
earlier. The slurry was then dried and sieved to a fine
powder. The mixed powders were uniaxially pressed
into pellets at a pressure of 60 MPa. The PVA binder
was burnt out at 550C with a heating rate of 1C/min.
Finally, the pellets were sintered at 1,025C for 6 h with
a heating rate of 5C/min. The sintered pellets were
investigated for phase formation by X-ray diffraction
[XRD]. Density of the sintered samples was measured
using the Archimedes method with distilled water as the
fluid medium. The microstructures of the sintered
samples were characterized using a scanning electron
microscope [SEM], and the average grain size was
determined using the linear intercept method. For the
electrical measurement, silver paste was applied to both sides
of the circular faces of the ceramics, then dried at 600C
for 15 min, and cooled naturally to room temperature.
The dielectric constant and dielectric loss were then
measured using a LCZ meter. The mechanical
properties (hardness) of various sintered samples were studied
using a Knoop microhardness tester. Indentations were
applied to the polished surfaces with 0.3- and 0.5-kg
loads and with an indentation period of 15 s.
Results and discussion
Phase formation
The XRD results for the sintered ceramics containing up
to 2 vol.% Al2O3 are illustrated in Figure 1. All of the
patterns were similar to the unmodified CCTO
diffraction peaks and were consistent with the results reported
previously [18]. The peaks of the second phases such as
Cu2O and CuO could not be observed in the XRD
patterns [14]. Further, no peak was observed for the Al2O3
phase in any of the XRD patterns. This may be due to
the amount of Al2O3 additive which was too little to be
detected at the sensitivity level of the XRD instrument.
Densification, microstructure, and hardness behavior
The plot of density as a function of Al2O3 volume
fraction is shown in Figure 2. The density slightly increased
with the increasing amounts of Al2O3 up to 0.5 vol.%
and then decreased for the 2 vol.% sample. The
reduction in density for the higher Al2O3 samples suggests
that the sintering mechanism of the samples was not
complete. To obtain the best densification for
compositions > 0.5 vol.% Al2O3, higher sintering temperatures
or longer soaking times would be required.
Figure 3 displays the SEM micrographs of the
as-sintered surfaces of CC3.1TO-Al2O3 nanocomposites. An
Figure 1 XRD patterns of the surfaces of the CC3.1TO and CC3.1TO-Al2O3 pellets.
Figure 2 Density and average grain size as Al2O3 volume fraction function for CC3.1TO and CC3.1TO-Al2O3 nanocomposites. Inset
shows Knoop hardness value as a function of Al2O3 content of the samples.
agglomeration of Al2O3 nanoparticles was not explicitly
observed, implying that the processing method (...truncated)