Core rumen microbes are functional generalists that sustain host metabolism and gut ecosystem function
nature ecology & evolution
Article
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02904-3
Core rumen microbes are functional
generalists that sustain host metabolism and
gut ecosystem function
Received: 5 November 2024
Accepted: 17 October 2025
Published online: xx xx xxxx
Check for updates
Omar E. Tovar-Herrera 1,2,3, Ido Grinshpan1,2,3, Gil Sorek
Liron Levin4, Sarah Moraïs 1,2,3 & Itzhak Mizrahi 1,2,3
, Ido Lybovits
1,2,3
,
1,2,3
Some microbes persist across diverse gut microbiomes, raising the question
of what features define these core taxa and allow them to persist across hosts.
Using the rumen microbiome as a model system, we show that core microbes
exhibit distinct attributes of ecological generalists, including greater strain
variability and broader functional capacity, linked to larger genome sizes. By
analysing ~3,000 genomes of core and non-core microbes and metabolically
measuring their functional attributes with both biochemical assays and
untargeted/targeted metabolomics, we find that these traits enable core
microbes to be metabolically independent while also supporting non-core
microbes and the host. Core taxa produce essential metabolites, such as
amino acids and vitamins, and encode fibre-degrading enzymes crucial
for host nutrition. Additionally, they engage in cross-feeding, providing
non-core microbes with vital nutrients. This independence positions core
microbes as foundational pillars of gut ecosystem stability, and influencing
these microbes could modulate microbiome functionality and ruminant host
metabolism, with possible downstream consequences for food security and
environmental sustainability.
Microbial communities, including those in the gut of animals, are
exposed to constant environmental fluctuations that directly affect
their assembly and dynamics. Despite these continual changes, certain
community members are consistently found across several hosts or
habitats. Such microbes can be described under the generalist–specialist framework, where those with high occupancy are defined as
habitat-generalists1. These persistent and widespread microbes associated with specific gut ecosystems such as the human gut or the rumen
environment, are described as members of the core microbiome2. In
recent years, substantial efforts have been made to understand the
contributions of core microbes to host fitness, health and disease3–7.
However, the underlying factors contributing to their persistence
across several hosts and habitats remain poorly understood. Positive
interactions and lower intraspecific competition have been pointed
out as features of microbial core gut species in fish7, while a cohesive
phylogenetic structure and higher heritability index were properties
of some core members in cows8.
In this study, we aim to explore the connection between habitatgeneralist microbes, defined as the host-associated core microbiome,
and their functional attributes, by systematically integrating ecological and evolutionary perspectives to generalize the roles of core taxa.
We chose the rumen microbiome ecosystem for this purpose, as the
intricate symbiotic relationship between ruminants and their microbiome has become a model system for studying the host–microbiome
axis9. The rumen ecosystem provides the bovine host with up to 80%
of its energy requirements, as well as essential metabolites such as
amino acids and vitamins, through the activity of its resident microbial
community10,11. This remarkable process involves diverse microbial
1
National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. 2Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University
of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. 3The Goldman Sonnenfeldt School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva,
Israel. 4Bioinformatics Core Facility, llse Katz Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
e-mail:
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Article
(i)
(ii)
Number of genera
a
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-025-02904-3
8
Ref.
16
Ref.
Succiniclasticum
Saccharofermentans*
Selenomonas
Ruminococcus
Butyrivibrio
Pseudobutyrivibrio
Anaeroplasma
Prevotella
Succinivibrio
Methanobrevibacter
Fibrobacter
Treponema
Unclassified genus 1
Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group
>80%
animals
200
Non-core
(95.08%)
426 genera
100
Core
(4.92%)
14 genera
0
0
Ref.
(iii)
300
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Prevalence
17
8
Ref. ,
n = 1,016
16
Ref. ,
n = 742
17
Ref. ,
n = 16
b
(i)
(iv)
Number of genomes
Dataset
Ref. 18
4,941
Ref. 19
10,373
Ref. 20
410
Total genomes = 15,726
14
(ii)
>90% completeness
<10% contamination
(dRep and GTDBTK)
Genomes without taxonomic
annotation were removed
Total dereplicated genomes = 4,655
(iii)
2,553 non-core
1,260 core
Metabolic pathway analysis
(Anvi'o)
CAZyme profiling
(dbCAN2)
Total annotated genomes = 3,813
Non-core
Core genera
Prevotella
Ruminococcus
Saccharofermentans
Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group
Pseudobutyrivibrio
Selenomonas
Succiniclasticum
Anaeroplasma
Treponema
Fibrobacter
Succinivibrio
Butyrivibrio
Fig. 1 | A global core rumen microbiome is represented by 14 microbial
genera. a, Identification of core rumen microbiome genera. (i) Worldwide
locations of ruminant samples used in our analysis. Countries from which
samples were collected in refs. 8,16,17 are depicted in shades of blue on the
global map. (ii) Global core rumen genera are also identified in a 1,016-cow
European study. The prevalence of genera across the 1,016-cow cohort of ref. 8
is shown: grey depicts genera with less than 80% prevalence (non-core) across
the cohort while green indicates more than 80% (core). (iii) Correspondence of
the 14 core genera found in at least two of the studies from refs. 8,16,17 cohorts.
The circles in shades of blue indicate which microbes were identified as core
in the study listed at the bottom of each column. The microbial names on the
right represent the 14 core genera found in ref. 8. Although Saccharofermentans
was only detected as a core microbe in ref. 8, we included it in our analysis
because of the large number of available representative genomes for this
genus. The number below the name of the dataset indicates the number of
animals included in the study. b, Genome database of core and non-core rumen
microbes. (i) Number and source of MAGs and genomes collected. Genomes
derived from ref. 20 correspond to isolates from the Hungate Collection. (ii)
Taxonomic annotation and quality control. Preprocessing of the database of the
genome, including completeness, contamination, dereplication and taxonomic
annotation using dRep 2.0 and GTDBTK, resulting in 4,655 curated MAGs and
genomes. (iii) Functional annotation of dereplicated genomes. Metabolic
pathways and glycosyl hydrolases in each genome were annotated using anvi’o
and dBCan 2.0. Genomes lacking taxonomic annotation or with fewer than
five representatives per gen (...truncated)