Impact of baryon physics on dark matter structures: a detailed simulation study of halo density profiles

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Jul 2010

The back-reaction of baryons on the dark matter halo density profile is of great interest, not least because it is an important systematic uncertainty when attempting to detect the dark matter. Here, we draw on a large suite of high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to systematically investigate this process and its dependence on the baryonic physics associated with galaxy formation. The effects of baryons on the dark matter distribution are typically not well described by adiabatic contraction models. In the inner 10 per cent of the virial radius the models are only successful if we allow their parameters to vary with baryonic physics, halo mass and redshift, thereby removing all predictive power. On larger scales the profiles from dark matter only simulations consistently provide better fits than adiabatic contraction models, even when we allow the parameters of the latter models to vary. The inclusion of baryons results in significantly more concentrated density profiles if radiative cooling is efficient and feedback is weak. The dark matter halo concentration can in that case increase by as much as 30 (10) per cent on galaxy (cluster) scales. The most significant effects occur in galaxies at high redshift, where there is a strong anticorrelation between the baryon fraction in the halo centre and the inner slope of both the total and the dark matter density profiles. If feedback is weak, isothermal inner profiles form, in agreement with observations of massive, early-type galaxies. However, we find that active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback, or extremely efficient feedback from massive stars, is necessary to match observed stellar fractions in groups and clusters, as well as to keep the maximum circular velocity similar to the virial velocity as observed for disc galaxies. These strong feedback models reduce the baryon fraction in galaxies by a factor of 3 relative to the case with no feedback. The AGN is even capable of reducing the baryon fraction by a factor of 2 in the inner region of group and cluster haloes. This in turn results in inner density profiles which are typically shallower than isothermal and the halo concentrations tend to be lower than in the absence of baryons. We therefore conclude that the disagreement between the concentrations inferred from observations of groups of galaxies and predictions from simulations that was identified by Duffy et al. is not alleviated by the inclusion of baryons.

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/405/4/2161.full.pdf

Impact of baryon physics on dark matter structures: a detailed simulation study of halo density profiles

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 2161–2178 (2010) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16613.x Impact of baryon physics on dark matter structures: a detailed simulation study of halo density profiles Alan R. Duffy,1,2,3 Joop Schaye,2 Scott T. Kay,1 Claudio Dalla Vecchia,2,4 Richard A. Battye1 and C. M. Booth2 1 Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL 2 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands 3 ICRAR, The University of Western Australia, M468, WA 6009, Australia 4 Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestial Physics, Giessenbachstraβe, D-85748 Garching, Germany Accepted 2010 March 2. Received 2010 January 19 The back-reaction of baryons on the dark matter halo density profile is of great interest, not least because it is an important systematic uncertainty when attempting to detect the dark matter. Here, we draw on a large suite of high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to systematically investigate this process and its dependence on the baryonic physics associated with galaxy formation. The effects of baryons on the dark matter distribution are typically not well described by adiabatic contraction models. In the inner 10 per cent of the virial radius the models are only successful if we allow their parameters to vary with baryonic physics, halo mass and redshift, thereby removing all predictive power. On larger scales the profiles from dark matter only simulations consistently provide better fits than adiabatic contraction models, even when we allow the parameters of the latter models to vary. The inclusion of baryons results in significantly more concentrated density profiles if radiative cooling is efficient and feedback is weak. The dark matter halo concentration can in that case increase by as much as 30 (10) per cent on galaxy (cluster) scales. The most significant effects occur in galaxies at high redshift, where there is a strong anticorrelation between the baryon fraction in the halo centre and the inner slope of both the total and the dark matter density profiles. If feedback is weak, isothermal inner profiles form, in agreement with observations of massive, early-type galaxies. However, we find that active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback, or extremely efficient feedback from massive stars, is necessary to match observed stellar fractions in groups and clusters, as well as to keep the maximum circular velocity similar to the virial velocity as observed for disc galaxies. These strong feedback models reduce the baryon fraction in galaxies by a factor of 3 relative to the case with no feedback. The AGN is even capable of reducing the baryon fraction by a factor of 2 in the inner region of group and cluster haloes. This in turn results in inner density profiles which are typically shallower than isothermal and the halo concentrations tend to be lower than in the absence of baryons. We therefore conclude that the disagreement between the concentrations inferred from observations of groups of galaxies and predictions from simulations that was identified by Duffy et al. is not alleviated by the inclusion of baryons. Key words: hydrodynamics – gravitation – methods: numerical – galaxies: haloes – galaxies: structure – dark matter. 1 I N T RO D U C T I O N Increasingly powerful computers, combined with ever more efficient N-body codes, have permitted accurate numerical tests of structure formation in a cold dark matter (CDM) universe (e.g.  E-mail:  C 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation  C 2010 RAS Klypin, Primack & Holtzman 1996; Navarro, Frenk & White 1997, hereafter NFW; Moore et al. 1999b; Bullock et al. 2001; Springel et al. 2005b; Diemand et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2008). It is now an established prediction that CDM haloes form a cuspy mass distribution that is close to a ‘universal profile’, independent of halo mass (Navarro, Frenk & White 1996; NFW). In detail, however, the haloes are not strictly self-similar (Navarro et al. 2010). Foremost amongst these results has been the existence of power-law relationships in ABSTRACT 2162 A. R. Duffy et al. 2008). However, the influence of baryons on these smaller, less well-resolved objects are by no means certain. For example, the substructure may exhibit greater resistance to tidal disruption due to its deeper potential well in the presence of baryons, while at the same time the substructure will typically suffer from increased dynamical friction with the main halo (Jiang et al. 2008). Recent work by Macciò et al. (2006) found a factor of 2 increase in the number of surviving satellites in a galaxy-sized halo, in a hydrodynamical simulation relative to a DM-only simulation. This increased survival rate in the inner regions (Weinberg et al. 2008) may enable satellite infall to partly counteract the contraction of the DM halo, as these objects can efficiently transfer angular momentum to the inner parts of the DM halo, instead of being tidally disrupted at larger radii (for recent considerations of this effect see Abadi et al. 2009; Pedrosa, Tissera & Scannapieco 2009, 2010). The erasure of the central DM cusp in galaxies by infalling satellites was proposed by El-Zant et al. (2001) and for the case of clusters by El-Zant et al. (2004). The effect of the baryons on the inner DM density profile is of particular interest, as it is currently a significant source of uncertainty when making predictions for DM detection experiments. For example, the expected γ -ray signal from self-annihilation of potential DM candidate particles (Springel et al. 2008b), which may become detectable in the near future using γ -ray observatories such 2 . We further note that the total as Fermi,1 is proportional to ρDM mass density profile is also of interest, as it is this quantity that is determined from strong lensing studies and is relevant for direct comparison with such observations (for a review of the methodologies and uses of strong lensing, see Kochanek 2006). The incorporation of baryons in a simulation is a challenging theoretical undertaking as the relevant scales of the physical processes are rarely resolved in a cosmological simulation and approximations are therefore necessary. The method by which stellar feedback, for example, is incorporated can have a large influence on the resulting baryonic distribution of the galaxy (e.g. Dalla Vecchia & Schaye 2008). For this reason, we have attempted to probe these effects in a systematic way by examining the DM halo density profiles from galaxies, groups and clusters, drawn from an extensive series of cosmological simulations with that incorporate a wide variety of prescriptions for baryonic processes. These form a subset of the larger, overall simulation series known as the OverWhelmingly Large Simulations (OWLS) project (Schaye et al. 2010). Our work has a number of novel features that allow us to extend recent studies that have probed the dyn (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/405/4/2161.full.pdf
Article home page: http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/405/4/2161.abstract

Alan R. Duffy, Joop Schaye, Scott T. Kay, Claudio Dalla Vecchia, Richard A. Battye, C. M. Booth. Impact of baryon physics on dark matter structures: a detailed simulation study of halo density profiles, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010, pp. 2161-2178, 405/4, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16613.x