Investment casting of gold jewellery
POROSITY IN CASTINGS
0
1
3
4
ITS CAUSES
0
1
3
4
PREVENTION
0
1
3
4
Dieter Ott
0
1
3
4
Christoph J. Raub
0
1
3
4
0
Consultant,
International Gold Corporation
, Johannesburg,
Republic of South Africa
1
Forschungsinstitut fur Edelmetalle und Metallchemie
, Schw
2
bisch Gmund,
Federal Republic of Germany William S. Rapson (in part)
3
GoldBull., 1985, 18, (3)
4
GoddBull., 1985, 18, (3)
Porosity is one of the important causes for the rejection of jewelle, y items cast by the lost waxprocess. Ifitisofthesbrrnkagetype, thenthereisaconsiderablereseivoirofknowledge, arising f om experience in the casting of dental gold and other gold alloys, which can be drawn upon to overcome theproblem. If it isgas porosity, howevet; the caster is faced with thefact that therearespecialfeatures in regardto its occurrencein caratgoldcastingsabout which there isstilllittle information. This article addresses both these situations. It not only reviewsavailableinformationonshiinkageporosityindentalgoldalloys, butalsopresents an account of investigations carried out on certain hitherto unstudiedaspects ofgasporosity in caratgold castings. In particular itfocusses upon the role played by reactions between the metals being cast and the calcium sulphate-bondedinvestments which are generally usedforproduction of the moulds.
-
Shrinkage Porosity
This manifests itself in the form of irregularly shaped voids which
can be either small and fairly evenly distributed throughout the
castings (microscopic porosity) or larger (macroscopic porosity) and
confined to certain parts of the metal. Shrinkage porosity of the first
type does not pose serious problems. It tends to occur in castings of
small dimensions or in castings made using relatively low mould
temperatures. Under both these conditions solidification occurs
evenly and rapidly. Shrinkage porosity of the second type may cause
rejection of castings. It tends to occur in larger castings whenever free
flow of molten metal into any part of the solidifying casting in the
mould is blocked.
Thus under ideal conditions, after the metal immediately in
contact with the investment surface has solidified, the contraction
which follows cooling and, in particular, crystallization of the rest
of the metal should be compensated for by flow of fu rther molten
metal into the dendritic massfrom the sprue and its reservoir. Such
conditions are, however, not simply achieved.
In the early days of dental casting, shrinkage porosity near to the
point of attachment of the sprue was not an uncommon defect in
castings. It was the subject of a number of investigations which
demonstrated that it was caused by solidification of the melt in the
sprue cutting off the supply ofinelt to the main casting while it was
still undergoing solidification and contraction. It could be avoided
by appropriate attention to the melt temperature and to the design
and dimensions of the sprue and its reservoir.
Even with sprues of good design, it was nevertheless found that
localized shrinkage porosity still persisted in some castings near to
portions of their surfaces. This subsurface porosity was ultimately
found to be associated with slow cooling of the metal near certain
areas of the mould surface. Such slow cooling apparently arises
through selec tive heating of the surface of the investment over these
areas, either because of the pattern of flow ofmolten metal into the
mould during casting or in centrifugal casting owing to an
increase of the rate of heat transfer to the investment over these areas
as a result of selectively increased hydrostatic pressure of the melt
(16). Under these conditions, pockets of molten metal persist in
these areas aftersolidification elsewhere is complete, with the result
that localized shrinkage porosity or su b-surface porosity d evelops.
In the case of shrinkage porosity, the pores may contain gases
released from solution in the melt during its cooling and
solidification. However, no account of any specific studies in this
connection has been found, though the effects of hydrogen upon
the shrinkage porosity of aluminium-copper and
aluminiumsilicon alloys have been studied (22).
Gas Porosity
This manifests itself in the form of gas-containing pores which
are rounded orspherical in shape, and which have therefore clearly
been formed in the melt prior to its solidification. It can arise in a
variety of ways: for example, by release of gases from solution in the
melt as it cools, as a result of `back pressure' of gases in the mould
if the investment is not sufficiently permeable, by inclusion as a
result of turbulent flow of the melt while pouring, and by
generation of gases either directly or indirectly as a resu It of reactions
between the melt and the investmentmaterial. Although observed,
it seems never to have posed acute problems in the casting of dental
gold alloys.
Porosity in jewellery Gold Alloy Castings
In modern practice, porosity in 18- and 14-carat
gold-silvercopper alloy castings normally takes the form of microcrystallization
voids (shrinkage porosity) or gas bubbles in the metal (gas porosity).
Figure 1 is across section vertical to the surface ofan 18-carat gold
alloy with typical crystallization voids of dendritic origin. Figure 2
is a scanning electron microscope picture of a fracture surface of the
alloy. It shows the characteristic dendritic growth structure of the
crystallites which results in the formation of microcrystallization
voids. It wil l be apparent from the brief review above that knowledge
of this type of porosity, and of methods for its prevention, is
considerable and probably adequate for dealing with
manifestations of it which arise in castings of gold jewellery. This is
currently not the case in respect of gas porosity which is found, in
particular, in castings with considerable strength in their outside
layers and occurs frequently concentrated in a zone just below the
surface of the casting (see Figure 3).
It may be responsible therefore at least in part for
subsurface porosity, (2, 10, 24, 25).
The understanding of the occurrence and prevention of gas
porosity in cast gold jewellery has been made difficult by its sporadic
and often non-reproducible appearance in castings made using
both centrifugal and vacuum-assisted casting techniques. One
widely held view is that the gas bubbles or pores are the result of the
entrainment of air in the turbulent stream of metal when it is
opoured into ^the mou:ld.Their app^earance, however, does not accord
with this view, since their surfaces are without exception unoxidized.
Any direct contact with atmospheric oxygen is therefore excluded.
Thus, a thorough investigation of the effect appeared necessary.
Fig. 1 Micro-crystallization voids in a cross section, taken vertical to the surface, of
an 18-carat yellow gold casting Magnification: 50x
Fig.2 SEM picture ofthefracturesurfaceofthe18-caratyellowgoldcastingshown
in Fig. 1 showing the characteristic dendritic growth struc (...truncated)