Human Reproduction, Jan 2011
Introduction: The number of children born after frozen/thawed embryo transfer (FET) is steadily rising, as well as questions about their neonatal health and development. However, large studies on neonatal outcomes are limited. The main objective of this based controlled prospective study was to assess neonatal outcome of “cryo” singletons conceived with In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) or Intra Cytoplamic Sperm Injection (ICSI) born from FET, and to compare them with that of singleton controls conceived with IVF or ICSI and fresh transfer, as a reference, inside the very large French cohort “Follow Up”, which provides long term follow-up of children conceived with ART. Medical data are collected from sequential parental questionnaires administered from birth to age 5. The second objective was to establish a cohort for further evaluations of health of these infants during childhood. Material and Methods: This current prospective survey was carried out for 16 002 singletons born after ART and recruited at birth from 1998 to 2008. Thirty ART centers were involved in this survey. We report here birth questionnaire data. Among the total cohort of 16002 singletons, the cryo population was 2 140 (13.3%); 6.1% were initially conceived with IVF (cryo–IVF), and 7.3% with ICSI (cryo-ICSI). The control group was 13 862 singletons (86.6%), 34.1% born after IVF and fresh transfer, 52.5% after ICSI. IVF/ICSI ratio was higher in cryo cohort than in the fresh one (84% versus 65%, p < 0.0001). Main outcome measures were demographic parental data and neonatal data (mode of delivery, gestational age and preterm birth rate (PTB) < 37 weeks of amenorrhea (WA), mean child measurements and low birth weight (LBW). Results: Maternal and paternal ages were not statistically different in fresh and cryo groups (33.3 ± 4 & 33.2 ± 4/36 ± 5.7 & 36 ± 5.6 years). The primiparous/multiparous maternal status ratio appeared 1.6 higher (p < 0.0001) in fresh sample. The caesarean section/vaginal delivery ratio was the same in both populations (28%). The boys/girls ratio was 1.05 higher in the cryo population (NS).The PTB rates p = 0.64), although the gestational age was slightly lower in cryo (39.1 WA, SD 1.95) than in fresh (39.3 WA, SD 1.99). The mean birth weight was 102g higher in the cryo singletons versus the fresh ones. When considering term-born children ( > 37WA), the low birth weight (LBW) < 2500 g rate was significantly higher in fresh cohort. LBW/normal BW ratio was twice higher in fresh population than in cryo (3.6%/1.8%, p < 0.0001). Babies mean height (49.7 ± 4 and 50.1 ± 2 cms) and head circumference (34.5 ± 1.7 and 34.7 ± 1.7cms) were both in favor of cryo cohort (p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was not different between the two groups (0.19%/0.22%, OR = 0.84). When considering the initial ART in both cryo and fresh groups, we did not find any significant difference in neonatal outcomes, although maternal age was in both groups lower in ICSI versus IVF children. Conclusions: This survey is one of the largest on FET pregnancies. We observed that embryo freezing does not adversely affect neonatal outcome. Our results show that the outcome is similar or even better after FET compared with fresh transfer, particularly regarding fetal growth. These findings are not modified as the initial technique was IVF or ICSI. “Follow-up” survey at older ages will provide further evaluations of the congenital malformations, health and development of cryo children among the ART cohort. We wish to thank all the parents and ART centers medical teams who participated in this study.
This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1/i91.full.pdf
Article home page: http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1/i91.abstract
S. Epelboin, E. Devouche, H. Pejoan, G. Viot, G. Apter Danon, F. Olivennes, A. Follow Up ART Network, A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Noergaard, A.A Henningsen, S. Rasmussen, A. Nyboe Andersen, M.J Davies, V.M Moore, K. Willson, P. Van Essen, H. Scott, K. Priest, E.A Haan, A. Chan, A. Sazonova, K. Källen, A. Thurin-Kjellberg, U.B Wennerholm, C. Bergh, D. Wunder, E.M Neurohr, M. Faouzi, M. Birkhäuser, M. Garcia Cabrera, M.J Zurit, J.A Sainz, E. De la Hoz, V. Caballero, R. Garrido, M. Guo, M. Richardson, N.S Macklon. SELECTED ORAL COMMUNICATION SESSION, SESSION 60: CHILDREN’S HEALTH Wednesday 6 July 2011 10:00 – 11:45, Human Reproduction, 2011, pp. i91-i94, 26/suppl 1, DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.60