Arabidopsis peroxin 16 trafficks through the ER and an intermediate compartment to pre-existing peroxisomes via overlapping molecular targeting signals
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 1677–1693, 2007
doi:10.1093/jxb/erm018 Advance Access publication 12 April, 2007
This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details)
RESEARCH PAPER
Arabidopsis peroxin 16 trafficks through the ER and an
intermediate compartment to pre-existing peroxisomes
via overlapping molecular targeting signals
Sheetal K. Karnik and Richard N. Trelease*
Arizona State University, School of Life Sciences, PO Box 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA
Received 15 September 2006; Revised 8 January 2007; Accepted 22 January 2007
Previously it has been shown that the endogenous
Arabidopsis peroxin, AtPEX16, coexisted at steady
state in membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
and peroxisomes. Herein, an ER-to-peroxisome trafficking pathway and the requisite molecular targeting
signals for mycAtPEX16 transiently expressed in
Arabidopsis and tobacco BY-2 suspension cells are
described. Immunofluorescent mycAtPEX16 was observed initially in the cytosol (<2 h) and subsequently
(2–4 h) in perinuclear/reticular ER and non-Golgi/nonperoxisome structures termed the ER-peroxisome
intermediate compartment. After 4 h, all catalase- and
ascorbate peroxidase-containing peroxisomes also
possessed mycAtPEX16, indicative of mycAtPEX16
sorting to pre-existing peroxisomes. Incubations of
bombarded cells at 15 C, or in brefeldin A at 25 C,
resulted in accumulations of mycAtPEX16 within the
ER. Following re-equilibration of cold-treated cells at
25 C, or removal of brefeldin A, mycAtPEX16 was observed mainly in the ER-peroxisome intermediate compartment, and later within all of the peroxisomes in
both species. Two internal membrane helices and the
intervening sequence including the amino acid residues -VRS- were found necessary and sufficient for
targeting AtPEX16 first to the ER and then to peroxisomes. Individual targeting signals for these organelles were indistinguishable, indicative of overlapping
signal(s). In summary, the trafficking study of AtPEX16
revealed a dynamic link between the ER and preexisting peroxisomes, which provided novel data in
support of an upgraded semi-autonomous peroxisome
model portraying participation of the ER in the sorting
of certain peroxisome membrane proteins, such as
AtPEX16, through an intermediate compartment to
pre-existing plant peroxisomes.
Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells, ascorbate
peroxidase, brefeldin A, immunofluorescence microscopy,
inter-organellar targeting signals, peroxins, peroxisome
membrane protein, reticular endoplasmic reticulum, tobacco
BY-2 cells, transient protein expression.
Introduction
An important feature of peroxisomes is their lack of DNA
and protein synthesizing machinery, which dictate posttranslational acquisitions from the cytosol of virtually all
of their nuclear-encoded matrix and peroxisome membrane
proteins (PMPs) (Sparkes and Baker, 2002; Erdmann and
Schliebs, 2005). Peroxin (PEX) genes code for peroxins
(PEX), which are proteins that mediate multiple aspects of
peroxisome biogenesis such as ontogeny, maturation (differentiation), and multiplication (duplication and induced
proliferation). A consecutive numbering system was created to identify and compare PEX genes and their corresponding peroxin homologues (Distel et al., 1996). To
date, 23 plant peroxins have been identified. One of these
homologues, peroxin 16, has been identified in Arabidopsis (AtPEX16) (Lin et al., 1999) and in only two other
species, namely humans (HsPEX16) (Kim et al., 2006)
and the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica (YlPEX16) (Titorenko
and Rachubinski, 1998).
Lin et al. (1999) first reported that the Arabidopsis
SSE1 (shrunken seed) gene coded for the putative plant
peroxin 16 homologue—AtPEX16. More recently, Lin
et al. (2004) discovered that normal peroxisomes were not
present in sse1 mutant embryos and that a GFP chimeric
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
ª 2007 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which
permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
1678 Karnik and Trelease
AtPEX16 between the ER and peroxisomes in two
different plant cells.
The preponderance of endogenous AtPEX16 throughout
the ‘general’ ER and its coexistence within the peroxisomes in Arabidopisis suspension cells (Karnik and
Trelease, 2005) provided a unique opportunity to dissect
and elucidate the overall trafficking pathway of this PMP.
Transiently expressed myc-epitope-tagged AtPEX16 was
traced via immunofluorescence microscopy from its first
appearance in the cytosol ultimately to peroxisomes in
both Arabidopsis and tobacco BY-2 cells. These two cells
types were included in the study to assess the commonality of trafficking pathways within different plant species.
Observations were made during normal time-courses and
compared with observations made during time-courses in
which experimental treatments were imposed to impair
trafficking through the ER, i.e. low temperature and
brefeldin A (BFA) treatments. These experiments revealed
the existence of a perceived, but not previously described,
compartment in these cells, generally referred to as
an ‘ER-peroxisome intermediate compartment’ (ERPIC)
(Titorenko and Mullen, 2006). In addition, site-directed
mutagenesis of AtPEX16 was employed to elucidate putative necessary and/or sufficient targeting signals within the
pathway. Virtually the same results from all of these experiments with Arabidopsis and BY-2 cells collectively
validated and revealed new data relative to PMP trafficking in recent model(s) portraying semi-autonomous peroxisome maturation and replication during plant peroxisome
biogenesis.
Materials and methods
Suspension cell cultures, microprojectile bombardment, and
(immuno)fluorescence microscopy
Suspension cell cultures of Arabidopsis thaliana var. Landsberg
erecta and Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Bright Yellow (BY-2) were
grown and maintained as described previously by Lisenbee et al.
(2003a) and Lee et al. (1997), respectively. Cells were harvested
4-d post-subculture for transient transformations accomplished via
microprojectile biolistic bombardments, which were done according
to procedures described in Karnik and Trelease (2005) and Flynn
et al. (2005). Cells were spread on filter paper pre-moistened with
transformation buffer, bombarded, and were allowed to transiently
express gene products for varied times in the dark between 2 h and
23 h depending upon the experiment. Cells were fixed in 4%
formaldehyde (prepared from paraformaldehyde) for 1 h and then
processed using the standard tube procedure for immunofluorescence microscopy as described previously (Karnik and Trelease,
2005).
Antibody concentrations, room t (...truncated)