Clinical impact of evaluation of cardiovascular control by novel methods of heart rate dynamics
BY HEIKKI V. HUIKURI
()
1
2
JUHA S. PERKIO MA KI
1
2
ROBERTO MAESTRI
0
1
GIAN DOMENICO PINNA
0
1
0
Department of Biomedical Engineering, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Montescano
,
27040 Montescano
,
Italy
1
University of Oulu
,
PO Box 5000 (Kajaanintie 50), Oulu 90014
,
Finland
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Centre of Excellence in Research, University of Oulu
,
Oulu 90014
,
Finland
Heart rate variability (HRV) has been conventionally analysed with time- and frequencydomain methods, which measure the overall magnitude of RR interval fluctuations around its mean value or the magnitude of fluctuations in some predetermined frequencies. Analysis of heart rate dynamics by novel methods, such as heart rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats, deceleration capacity of heart rate and methods based on chaos theory and nonlinear system theory, have gained recent interest. Recent observational studies have suggested that some indices describing nonlinear heart rate dynamics, such as fractal scaling exponents, heart rate turbulence and deceleration capacity, may provide useful prognostic information in various clinical settings and their reproducibility may be better than that of traditional indices. For example, the short-term fractal scaling exponent measured by the detrended fluctuation analysis method has been shown to predict fatal cardiovascular events in various populations. Similarly, heart rate turbulence and deceleration capacity have performed better than traditional HRV measures in predicting mortality in post-infarction patients. Approximate entropy, a nonlinear index of heart rate dynamics, which describes the complexity of RR interval behaviour, has provided information on the vulnerability to atrial fibrillation. There are many other nonlinear indices which also give information on the characteristics of heart rate dynamics, but their clinical usefulness is not as well established. Although the concepts of nonlinear dynamics, fractal mathematics and complexity measures of heart rate behaviour, heart rate turbulence, deceleration capacity in relation to cardiovascular physiology or various cardiovascular events are still far away from clinical medicine, they are a fruitful area for research to expand our knowledge concerning the behaviour of cardiovascular oscillations in normal healthy conditions as well as in disease states.
1. Introduction
Several methods of heart rate variability (HRV ) have been used to describe the
complex regulatory system between heart rate and the autonomic nervous
system ( Task Force 1996). The conventional methods based on statistical
methods of variance and power spectral analysis of HRV are most often used.
The physiological background of these measurements is rather well understood.
The high-frequency (from 0.18 to 0.4 Hz) fluctuations of heart rate (and blood
pressure) are determined by respiration. These oscillations represent autonomic
neural fluctuations and central blood volume alterations (Cohen & Taylor 2002).
These high-frequency fluctuations are modified by the phenomenon called
respiratory gating, whose magnitude depends on the level of stimulation of
autonomic motor neurons. When the level of the stimulation is low (low vagal
activity at low arterial pressure), respiratory oscillations of vagal activity are
also low (Eckberg 2003). The low-frequency (from 0.03 to 0.15 Hz) fluctuations
of heart rate have been proposed to be derived from the arterial pressure Mayer
waves, whose major determinant is considered to be sympathetic vasomotor
activity (Cohen & Taylor 2002). The very-low-frequency fluctuations (below
0.03 Hz) have been attributed to the reninangiotensin system, other humoral
factors and thermoregulation. The conventional measures of HRV have been
shown to provide prognostic information in several patient populations (Kleiger
et al. 1987; Bigger et al. 1992, 1993; Fei et al. 1996; Zuanetti et al. 1996; Nolan
et al. 1998). Methods of HRV analysis based on nonlinear system theory and
beat-to-beat dynamics have gained recent interest as they may reveal delicate
changes of heart rate time series. Therefore, novel methods of HRV analysis are
constantly being developed (Saul et al. 1987; Goldberger 1990b; Yamamoto &
Hughson 1991; Skinner et al. 1993; Pincus & Goldberger 1994; Peng et al. 1995;
Goldberger 1996; Voss et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1999; Bauer et al. 2006; Tuzcu
et al. 2006; Norris et al. 2008a). Several types of different fractal scaling
measures, power-law analyses, complexity measures, measures of symbolic
dynamics, turbulence and deceleration capacity of heart rate have been studied
in various patient populations. These methods of analysing HRV aim to assess
qualitative properties rather than the magnitude of the signal. The fractal-like
scaling property, the complexity, the turbulence and the deceleration capacity
analyses are examples of the novel methods of investigating heart rate dynamics
whose clinical impact in the evaluation of cardiovascular control has been
assessed in large patient populations. In a few recent studies, many of these
measures have been suggested to have better clinical relevance than the
conventional measurements of HRV in prediction of future adverse events in
various patient groups. The physiological background of these novel methods of
analysing heart rate dynamics is much more poorly understood.
There are several other indices and mathematical methods that have been
used in characterizing the human heartbeat dynamics. Owing to the abundance
of these indices, we focus here only on those methods that have been used in
welldesigned clinical studies, including relevant numbers of patients and well-defined
clinical endpoints, and that have been reproduced by independent investigators
in multiple population samples.
In this review, the clinical impact of evaluation of cardiovascular control by novel
methods of analysing heart rate dynamics is mainly dealt with in cardiac patients.
2. Fractal measures of HRV
A basic feature of a fractal system is scale invariance, i.e. the same features
repeat themselves on different measurement scales (Goldberger 1996). Fractal
dynamics can be considered as a specific form of deterministic chaos and can
be explained by a nonlinear rule. Healthy subjects erratic fluctuations of sinus
rhythm have fractal-like characteristics ( Denton et al. 1990; Goldberger
1990a). Fractal (1/ f ) organization is flexible, and breakdown of this scale
invariance (self-similarity) may lead to a more rigid and less adaptable system
with either random or highly correlated behaviour of heart rate dynamics.
Complex interaction of vagal and sympathetic input to the sinus node is
thought to be an origin of the fractal-like heart rate behaviour (Goldberger &
West 1987; West & Goldberger 1987).
(a ) Power-law HRV analysis
A plot of spectral power and frequency on a bi-logarithmic scale shows linear
po (...truncated)