Advances in regional anaesthesia and pain management
Vincent Chan FR.CPC
0
0
From the Department of Anaesthesia, The Toronto Hospital, General Division
, 200 Elizabeth Street,
Toronto
, Ontario M5G 2C4
E G I O N A L anaesthesia performed for R ment is extremely safe1 and has enjoyed a surgery and for postoperative pain managerenaissance in recent years. A new local anaesthetic agent has been developed and recently launched in Canada. Block techniques are being refined or newly developed to localise nerve targets more accurately. New clinical knowledge is continuously generated, improving both block efficacy and patient safety. More than ever before, regional anaesthesia is part of a multi-modal approach to perioperative pain management that expedites patient recovery and discharge. This lecture will focus selectively on some of the important new developments of the past five years that have significant clinical relevance in the adult non-obstetrical patient population.
-
Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine (Naropin | Astra Canada), a new
aminoamide local anaesthetic, made its debut in
Canada in 1997. It is the first local anaesthetic
prepared isomerically pure in the S-enantiomer form,
making it less toxic than bupivacaine in the racemic
preparation (containing both R- and S- enantiomers).
Toxicity
Both drugs have similar physical and chemical profiles,
but their cardiovascular and central nervous system
(CNS) effects differ. Ropivacaine has less potential to
depress myocardial contractility and conduction and to
trigger ventricular arrhythmia. The fatal cardiotoxic
dose ratio in sheep is 1:2:9 for
bupivacaine:ropivacacine:lidocaine. A CNS toxicity study showed that
human subjects can tolerate a slow infusion of 30%
more ropivacaine than bupivacaine before symptoms
occur (mean: 124 mg vs99 mg). 2 A case of seizure and
hypotension has been reported after inadvertent
intraarterial injection of 150 mg ropivacaine, but without
development of arrhythmia or impaired recovery,s The
toxic blood concentration for ropivacaine has not yet
been documented in humans.
Advances in regional
anaesthesia and
pain management
Anaesthesia
Ropivacaine has been used for anaesthesia for a variety
of surgical procedures4 and the maximum
recommended dose is 2.5-3 mg-kg-1 for peripheral nerve,
brachial plexus and epidural blocks. When used in
brachial plexus block, ropivacaine 0.5% and
bupivacaine provide equivalent motor and sensory blockade,
with comparable onset time, long duration and
analgesic efficacy. However, higher concentrations
(0.75%-1%) and doses of ropivacaine are required to
achieve the same degree and duration of motor block
in epidural anaesthesia when compared with
bupivacaine, s It is important to note that the safety margin
for ropivacaine narrows if the dose is increased
substantially to augment motor block intensity. The
addition of epinephrine to ropivacaine is not warranted
because it does not alter block intensity or duration.
Ropivacaine has not been approved for spinal
anaesthesia, thus experience with this application is limited. 6
Analgesia
The greater sensory-motor separation property o f
epidural ropivacaine makes it an attractive drug for
postoperative pain management. So far, studies o f
epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia have
only examined the analgesic efficacy o f continuous
ropivacaine infusion alone in concentrations o f 0.1,
0.2 and 0.3%. 7 Analgesic efficacy proved
dose-dependent, but even with 0.3% at 10 ml-hr-1, systemic
opioid supplementation was necessary to achieve
satisfactory analgesia. Systemic accumulation over a
24-hr period of infusion at 10-30 mg.hr -1 produced
no systemic toxicity and low plasma concentrations, s
However, motor block developed over time even with
lower concentrations. 9 Thus, epidural infusion
ofropivacaine alone is not a useful postoperative
management technique. Alternatively, 0.1% combined with
epidural opioid might produce adequate analgesia
with lower risk of motor block but study results are
pending. At present, the 0.2% solution is
commercially available as a Polybag| epidural infusion kit with
100-ml and 200-ml doses.
Intravenous regional anaesthesia
New techniques of/VRA for upper extremity blocks are
applied to improve patient safety and post-block
analgesia. A recent survey o f North American anaesthetists
revealed that 66% of the respondents encountered
minor local anaesthetic-related side effects in patients
undergoing IVRA, 14% o f the anaesthetists reported
seizures and 1.2%, cardiac arrest. I~ Systemic toxic
complications can occur as a result of considerable leakage
or release o f local anaesthetic when the tourniquet is
inflated or deflated respectively. Drug leakage past a
properly inflated tourniquet (15% from the upper limb
and 29% from the lower limb) has been reported, ll
Lidocaine 0.5% (3 mg.kg-I, average 200 mg) is most
commonly used for IVRA. Since systemic toxicity is
dose-dependent, new approaches aim to reduce the
dose of lidocaine and supplement with opioid,
nondepolarising muscle relaxant or nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID); this is an example of balanced
analgesia. Morphine (6 mg), meperidine (100 mg) and
fentanyl (100-200 lag) have been used with local
anaesthetics with varying success. Meperidine distinguishes
itself from other opioids in that, when used alone, it
produces IVRAI2 but the optimal supplemental dose to
local anaesthetic has not been established.
Low-dose nondepolarising muscle relaxants (0.5 mg
pancuronium; 2 mg atracurium; and 0.6 mg
mivacurium) have been used successfully to improve the onset
time and intensity o f motor block with IVRA. The
combination o f low dose 1.5 mg.kg-~ lidocaine with
1 tag.kg-1 fentanyl and 0.5 mg pancuronium produces
an aaaaesthetic effect similar to that o f 3 mg.kgq
lidocaine at 20 min. ls,I4 Only minor side effects o f dizziness
and diplopia are observed at the time of tourniquet
deflation. It must be emphasised that muscle relaxant
administration must be carefully monitored, because
the systemic effect of higher doses is potentially lethal.
The addition of NSAIDs to IVRA can substantially
prolong postoperative analgesia, xs Injectable ketorolac
(60 mg) added to 190 mg lidocaine can prolong
analgesia to 10 hr (mean) and substantially reduce the
need for analgesic supplementation. The mechanism o f
action presumably is an anti-inflammatory response at
peripheral nerve endings, not a systemic effect. A
similar response is seen following direct wound infiltration
with ketorolac) 6 Although side effects have not been
reported following 60 mg ketorolac, a reduction in
dose (e.g., to 30 mg) might be worth exploring.
Brachial plexus block
Recently, several new approaches to brachial plexus
block have been described. The mid-humeral approach
blocks the brachial plexus below the axilla through a
single needle puncture in the upper third o f the arm by
anaesthetising, individually, each o f the four terminal
branches (median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous
nerves) with 10 ml local (...truncated)