Progress through cooperation: Securing a sound training pathway for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography
B
rry A. Fin
g
n MB FFARCS
FRCPC
-
Tageal echocardiography in this issue of the
HE publication of the Canadian guidelines
for training in adult perioperative
transesophJournal represents a major achievement for
the Canadian Perioperative Echocardiography Group
and for the subspecialty of cardiac anesthesiology in
Canada.1 The document is an honest effort, by those
involved, to provide guidance on a practical training
program for anesthesiologists wishing to use
transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in routine
clinical practice, and given the diversity of training of those
currently performing intraoperative TEE in Canada, is
more than timely.2 The authors sought and received
input from the Canadian Society of Echocardiography
and the wider membership of the Cardiovascular and
Thoracic Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists
Society, thereby ensuring diversity of opinion, an
essential requirement in guideline development.3
Intraoperative TEE is an integral component of
surgical cardiac care and has wide application
perioperatively.46 The performance of the examination
is operator-dependent and demands technical skill as
well as the ability to instantaneously interpret
information obtained and pursue additional images as
indicated by the findings observed. Interpretation of TEE
acquired images and placing them in the appropriate
context is crucial to assure a correct diagnosis and
subsequent management plan. This involves not
simply offering a diagnosis to our surgical colleagues, but
also providing an opinion as to the appropriate
intervention to take, or perhaps more importantly, not to
take, in a specific situation. This consultative role can
only be exercised with confidence and competence if
those offering it are appropriately trained. In 1987,
the American Society of Echocardiography published
training guidelines directed at cardiologists outlining
the components of a comprehensive
echocardiographic clinical examination, the core knowledge base,
the suggested duration of training duration leading to
each level of expertise in the modality, and the
experience and training required of those supervising
trainees.7 Subsequently, patterned on the latter document,
specific recommendations were developed for TEE.8
In cooperation with the Society of Cardiovascular
Anesthesiologists, training guidelines were
developed specifically addressing perioperative TEE.9 The
Canadian guidelines extend the expected proficiency
of an individual trained at a basic level to include
limited diagnostic abilities, specifically, recognition of
valvular heart lesions, intra-cardiac masses and
pericardial effusions of significance. This is a sensible
recognition of the expertise one would realistically expect of
a specialist physician who undertakes three months of
dedicated training in TEE and is supported by research
aimed at assessing how rapidly physicians can master
basic echocardiographic skills. In a prospective,
observational, educational study, emergency medicine (ER)
residents (PGY 13) completed a written and
practical examination assessing their knowledge on how to
complete and interpret a goal-directed transthoracic
echocardiogram (TTE) immediately prior and
subsequent to a five-hour didactic session and one-hour
proctored practical echocardiographic training session
developed by an ER ultrasound director and a
cardiologist.10 Significant improvements in correct written
test scores (from 54% pre to 94% post) and capacity to
perform an appropriate goaldirected TTE (from 56%
pre to 94% post) were observed. A prospective study
assessing the ability of medical residents to learn how
to effectively perform and interpret TTE at the bedside
following a brief didactic and practical instruction
session demonstrated that such skills could be acquired
rapidly.11 Hand-carried cardiac ultrasonography used
as a supplement to routine physical examination, even
in the hands of relatively inexperienced individuals,
can add significantly to diagnostic accuracy.12
Ultrasound imaging equipment is now
relatively inexpensive, widely available and portable.
Anesthesiologists not involved in cardiovascular
anesthesia routinely use ultrasonography to facilitate
localization of nerve bundles during regional anesthesia
and catheter placement. Consequently, exposure to
ultrasound imaging occurs throughout residency
training. Canadian residents seem eager to obtain
further training in echocardiography, with 40%
expressing a desire to take such training as an alternative to
engaging in research related activity.13 Although not
addressed by Bque et al.,1 there is clearly a need for
inclusion of structured echocardiographic training
within our residency programs and a mechanism for
acknowledgement of such training subsequent to
successful completion of residency.
The proposed continuing medical education (CME)
and maintenance of competence guidelines are
reasonable and achievable by most practitioners in academic
centres. In the absence of a critical mass, physicians
in smaller non-academic centres will be challenged
to meet peer review expectations.
Echocardiographyrelated CME relevant to anesthesiologists is not
widely available in Canada and one is hopeful that the
publication of the guidelines will act as stimulus to the
provision of such CME opportunities for Canadian
anesthesiologists in an easily accessible manner.
The guidelines address the issue of TEE training
and encourage training in TTE. If anesthesiologists
are to contribute meaningfully to the development
of echocardiography, then comprehensive training,
particularly of those in educational leadership roles,
in all aspects of the modality, including TTE, is
distinctly advantageous. One of the most exciting
recent developments in the field, three dimensional
(3D) echocardiography, is by and large, confined to
TTE acquired images.14 With time, 3D imaging will
be routinely available from the esophageal window
and will form a very useful adjunct to our current
menu of images, particularly in the assessment of
mitral valve pathology.15 Optimally, anesthesiologists
intending to supervise those training in
echocardiography should be exposed to such novel applications
of the technology and be the leaders in introducing
relevant advances into perioperative practice. This
requires that time be spent in a cardiology-directed
echocardiography laboratory. Training in the latter
environment offers particular advantages, including
exposure to a high volume and varied TTE practice
and insight into the decision-making process which
directs a patient toward a surgical intervention rather
than continued observation. Furthermore, collegial
relationships between cardiologists and
anesthesiologists are fostered by this approach, which are of great
value in the ongoing development of a perioperative
TEE service.
The blurring of the borders of specific disciplines in
medicine and the requirement of physicians to
continually adapt and engage in skill development (...truncated)