On some sufficient conditions for univalence and starlikeness
Sokół and Nunokawa Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:282
http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/282
RESEARCH
Open Access
On some sufficient conditions for univalence
and starlikeness
Janusz Sokół1* and Mamoru Nunokawa2
*
Correspondence:
Department of Mathematics,
Rzeszów University of Technology,
Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12,
Rzeszów, 35-959, Poland
Full list of author information is
available at the end of the article
1
Abstract
In this work, the conditions for univalence, starlikeness and convexity are discussed.
MSC: Primary 30C45; secondary 30C80
Keywords: strongly starlike functions; convex functions of order alpha; Jack’s lemma;
Nunokawa’s lemma; Umezawa condition; univalence criteria
1 Introduction
We shall consider the set H of all analytic functions in the open unit disc
D = z : |z| <
on the complex plane C and
A = f ∈ H : f (z) = z + a z + · · · .
The class Sα* of starlike functions of order α < may be defined as
Sα* =
zf (z)
f ∈ A : Re
> α, z ∈ D .
f (z)
The class Sα* and the class Kα of convex functions of order α <
zf (z)
> α, z ∈ D
Kα := f ∈ A : Re +
f (z)
*
= f ∈ A : zf ∈ Sα
were introduced by Robertson in []. If α ∈ [; ), then a function in either of these sets is
univalent. In particular, we denote by S* = S * , K = K the classes of starlike and convex
functions, respectively.
2 Preliminaries
Lemma . Let O = , P = α + iaα, Q = x + iax and A ∈ (, +∞) be the points on the
complex plane, where < α ≤ A/, α < x and –∞ < a < ∞. Then we have
|A – Q| |A – P| A – α
<
≤
.
|O – Q| |O – P|
α
(.)
© 2012 Sokół and Nunokawa; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sokół and Nunokawa Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:282
http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/282
Page 2 of 11
O = ,
P = α + iaα,
A = ,
Q = x + iax,
< α ≤ A/,
∠PAO = ψ,
∠QOA = ϕ,
∠OAQ = ψ .
Figure 1 The lines and the points.
Proof For a = , the assertion is obvious. For a = , consider the triangles OAP and OAQ,
see Figure . Both of them have the same angle ϕ at the point O. Let the first have the angle
ψ at the point A and the second have the angle ψ at the point A. Then the hypothesis
< α ≤ A/ implies cos ϕ ≤ cos ψ. Further we have
cos ϕ =
α
,
|P|
cos ψ =
A–α
.
|A – P|
This gives the second inequality of the assertion. The first one follows immediately from
sin ψ > sin ψ and
|A – Q| sin ϕ
=
.
|Q|
sin ψ
|A – P| sin ϕ
=
,
|P|
sin ψ
3 Main result
n
Theorem . Let p(z) = + ∞
n=k≥ cn z be analytic in the unit disc D and α be a positive
real number < α ≤ /. Then suppose that there exists a point z , |z | < such that
Re p(z) > α
for |z| < |z |
(.)
and
Re p(z ) = p(z ) = α.
(.)
Then we have
z p (z )
≤ –k( – α).
p(z )
Proof Let us put
q(z) =
p(z) –
,
p(z)
q() = .
(.)
Sokół and Nunokawa Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:282
http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/282
Page 3 of 11
Then the function q is analytic in |z| ≤ |z | < and from the hypothesis of Theorem .
and Lemma ., with A = , we have
q(z) <
–α
α
for |z| ≤ |z | and
q(z ) =
–α
.
α
This shows that |q(z)| takes its maximum at z = z on the circle |z| = |z |. Then from FukuiSakaguchi [] and Jack’s [] lemmas, there exists a real number k ≥ such that
z p (z ) z p (z )
z q (z )
=
–
q(z )
p(z ) –
p(z )
= z p (z )
–
α– α
=
z p (z )
α(α – )
≥ k.
This shows that z p (z ) is a negative real number and
z p (z ) z p (z )
=
≤ –k( – α).
α
p(z )
This completes the proof of Theorem ..
Theorem . is, in a certain sense, the supplement of Nunokawa’s lemma []. From Theorem . we have the following corollaries.
n
Corollary . Let p(z) = + ∞
n= cn z be analytic in the unit disc D and α be a positive
real number < α ≤ /. Suppose also that for arbitrary r, < r < , p satisfies the condition
min Re p(z) = min p(z)
|z|≤r
|z|≤r
(.)
and
zp (z)
Re p(z) +
> α – for |z| < .
p(z)
(.)
Then we have
Re p(z) > α
for |z| < .
Proof If there exists a point z , |z | < , such that
Re p(z) > α
for |z| < |z |
(.)
Sokół and Nunokawa Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:282
http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/282
Page 4 of 11
and
Re p(z ) = α,
< α ≤ /,
then from the hypothesis of Corollary ., we have
Re p(z ) = p(z ) = α.
Then from Theorem ., we have
z p (z )
≤ α – ,
p(z )
and therefore we have
z p (z )
Re p(z ) +
≤ α – .
p(z )
This contradicts the hypothesis of Corollary . and it completes the proof of Corollary ..
n
Corollary . Let f (z) = z + ∞
n= an z be analytic in the unit disc D and α be a positive
real number < α ≤ /. Suppose that for arbitrary r, < r < , f satisfies the condition
zf (z)
zf (z)
= min
|z|≤r f (z)
f (z)
(.)
zf (z)
> α – for |z| < ,
Re +
f (z)
(.)
min Re
|z|≤r
and
where
– < α – ≤ .
Then we have
zf (z)
>α
Re
f (z)
for |z| < ,
(.)
or f is starlike of order α.
Proof Putting
p(z) =
zf (z)
,
f (z)
it follows that
p(z) +
zp (z)
zf (z)
=+
.
p(z)
f (z)
Then from Corollary ., we have (.).
Sokół and Nunokawa Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:282
http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/282
Page 5 of 11
n
Theorem . Let p(z) = + ∞
n=k≥ cn z be analytic in the unit disc D and α be a positive
real number / < α < . Then suppose that there exists a point z ∈ D such that
Re p(z) > α
for |z| < |z |
(.)
and
Re p(z ) = p(z ) = α.
(.)
Then we have
z p (z )
k( – α)
z p (z )
= Re
.
≤–
p(z )
p(z )
(.)
Proof Let us put
q(z) =
– p(z)
– ,
p(z)
q() = .
Then from Lemma ., with A = , we have that |q(z) + | takes its maximum value at z = z
on the circle |z| = |z | or
–α
– p(z)
.
=
|z|=|z |
p(z)
α
max q(z) + = max
|z|=|z |
Applying Jack [], Miller-Mocanu [] and Fukui-Sakaguchi’s [] lemmas, there exists a real
number m ≥ k such that
z p (z ) z p (z )
z q (z )
=–
–
q(z )
– p(z )
p(z )
= –z p (z )
+
–α α
z p (z )
α( – α)
z p (z )
=–
p(z ) – α
=–
≥ m ≥ k.
This shows that
k( – α)
z p (z )
≤–
.
p(z )
This completes the proof of Theorem ..
n
Corollary . Let f (z) = z + ∞
n= an z be analytic in the unit disc D and α be a positive
real number / < α < . Suppose that for arbitrary r, < r < , f satisfies the condition
min Re
|z|≤r
zf (z)
zf (z)
= min
|z|≤r f (z)
f (z)
(.)
Sokół and Nunokawa Jo (...truncated)