A case-control study of physical activity patterns and risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction
Jian Gong
0
Hannia Campos
3
Mark Joseph A Fiecas
2
Stephen T McGarvey
0
Robert Goldberg
5
Caroline Richardson
4
Ana Baylin
0
1
0
Department of Community Health, Brown University
,
Providence, RI 02912
,
USA
1
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan
,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
,
USA
2
Department of Psychiatry, University of California
,
San DiegoLa JollaCA 92093
,
USA
3
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health
,
Boston, MA 02115
,
USA
4
Deparment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan
,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
,
USA
5
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School
,
Worcester, MA 01655
,
USA
Background: The interactive effects of different types of physical activity on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk have not been fully considered in previous studies. We aimed to identify physical activity patterns that take into account combinations of physical activities and examine the association between derived physical activity patterns and risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: We examined the relationship between physical activity patterns, identified by principal component analysis (PCA), and AMI risk in a case-control study of myocardial infarction in Costa Rica (N=4172), 1994-2004. The component scores derived from PCA and total METS were used in natural cubic spline models to assess the association between physical activity and AMI risk. Results: Four physical activity patterns were retained from PCA that were characterized as the rest/sleep, agricultural job, light indoor activity, and manual labor job patterns. The light indoor activity and rest/sleep patterns showed an inverse linear relation (P for linearity=0.001) and a U-shaped association (P for non-linearity=0.03) with AMI risk, respectively. There was an inverse association between total activity-related energy expenditure and AMI risk but it reached a plateau at high levels of physical activity (P for non-linearity=0.01). Conclusions: These data suggest that a light indoor activity pattern is associated with reduced AMI risk. PCA provides a new approach to investigate the relationship between physical activity and CVD risk.
-
Background
Numerous observational epidemiologic studies have
demonstrated that physical activity is inversely related to
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [1-4]. Physical
activity may contribute up to 20% - 30% reduced risk of
coronary heart disease [5,6]. However, studies have shown
that different types of physical activities may have different
effects on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and
may interact together [7-12]. For example, some leisure
time activities such as walking, stair climbing, and cycling
provide protection against CVD [7-12], whereas others,
such as intensive domestic physical activity, may not offer
protection against CVD [11]. There are also interactive
effects between lack of exercise and sitting at work and
between demanding household work and sitting at work
on the association with increased risk of acute myocardial
infarction (AMI) [9]. Therefore, if we use a single
summary measurement to reflect physical activity, such as
METS, the association between physical activity and risk
of CVD might be biased because subjects who have the
same measured value may have a distinct combination of
physical activities. Furthermore, studying different types of
physical activity in isolation may not adequately consider
any joint and interactive associations on the risk of CVD.
Previous models that incorporate one type of physical
activity of interest and other types of physical activity (as
potential confounders) for exploring the effects of each
type of physical activity on CVD may be problematic
because of the concomitant change in total physical
activity. As one type of physical activity increases, total
physical activity increases as well, given that the other
physical activities are fixed. Hence, the effect estimate of
one type of physical activity does not present its pure
effect, but includes the effects of total physical activity.
In order to overcome these challenges in the analysis of
physical activity data, we used the method of principal
component analysis (PCA) [13] to identify physical activity
patterns that take into account combinations of physical
activities. We used both parametric and semi-parametric
regression models to examine the association between
derived physical activity patterns and risk of acute
myocardial infarction (AMI). Data from a population-based,
casecontrol study in Costa Rica were utilized for purposes of
this investigation.
Methods
Study population
In Costa Rica, CVD has been the countrys leading cause
of death since 1970 and the mortality rate for CVD has
been declining since 2002 according to 2007 Health in
the Americas, a report from World Health Organization.
The participants in this study are cases and controls
from a case-control study of non-fatal myocardial
infarction conducted in the Central Valley in Costa Rica from
1994 to 2004. The study design and population have
been described previously [14,15]. In brief, eligible cases
were men and women who were diagnosed as survivors
of a first AMI by two independent cardiologists at any of
the six recruiting hospitals in the Central Valley of Costa
Rica during the period 1994-2004. All cases met the
World Health Organization criteria for AMI [16].
Enrollment was carried out while cases were in the hospitals
step-down-unit. One free-living control subject for each
case, matched for age ( 5 years), sex, and area of
residence (county), was randomly selected using information
available at the National Census and Statistics Bureau of
Costa Rica. Participation rates were 98% for cases and
88% for controls. Cases and controls provided informed
consent on documents approved by the Human Subjects
Committee of the Harvard School of Public Health and
the University of Costa Rica.
Data collection
Trained interviewers visited all study participants at
their homes for purposes of collecting sociodemographic
characteristics, physical activity, lifestyle, medical history,
smoking, and dietary data by use of a standardized
questionnaire [15]. They visited cases, on average, within 3
weeks of hospital discharge (for controls, hospital
discharge of the corresponding case subject) and when
possible, by the same interviewer. Identical questionnaires
and data collection procedures were used for cases and
controls. The standardized activity questionnaire
consisted of 18 questions and physical activity was determined
by asking subjects the average frequency and time spent
on several occupational and leisure time activities during
the last year. These activities were grouped into six
categories according to their intensity or metabolic
equivalents (METs): lying quietly in bed: afternoon nap or
rest and night sleep (0.9 METs); sitting (1.0 METs); light
indoor activity such as standing at work or at (...truncated)