Dominance induction of fruitlet shedding in Malus × domestica (L. Borkh): molecular changes associated with polar auxin transport
BMC Plant Biology
Dominance induction of fruitlet shedding in Malus domestica (L. Borkh): molecular changes associated with polar auxin transport
Valeriano Dal Cin 0 2
Riccardo Velasco 1
Angelo Ramina 2
0 Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida , Gainesville, PO Box 116090 , USA
1 Experimental Institute for Agriculture , via Mach 2 San Michele all'Adige, 38010 Trento , Italy
2 Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Science, University of Padova , Viale dell'Universita 16, 35020 Legnaro (Padova) , Italy
Background: Apple fruitlet abscission is induced by dominance, a process in which hormones such as auxin, cytokinins and strigolactone play a pivotal role. The response to these hormones is controlled by transcription regulators such as Aux/IAA and ARR, whereas auxin transport is controlled by influx and efflux carriers. Results: Seven partial clones encoding auxin efflux carriers (MdPIN1_A, MdPIN1_B, MdPIN10_A, MdPIN10_B, MdPIN4, MdPIN7_A and MdPIN7_B), three encoding auxin influx carriers (MdLAX1, MdLAX2 and MdLAX3) and three encoding type A ARR cytokinin response regulators (MdARR3, MdARR4 and MdARR6) were isolated by the use of degenerate primers. The organization of the PIN multigene family in apple is closer to Medicago truncatula than to Arabidopsis thaliana. The genes are differentially expressed in diverse plant organs and at different developmental stages. MdPIN1 and MdPIN7 are largely more expressed than MdPIN10 and MdPIN4. During abscission, the transcription of these genes increased in the cortex whereas in the seed a sharp fall was observed. The expression of these genes was found to be at least partially controlled by ethylene and auxin. Conclusion: The ethylene burst preceding abscission of fruitlets may be responsible for the decrease in transcript level of MDPIN1, MDARR5 and MDIAA3 in seed. This situation modulates the status of the fruitlet and its fate by hampering the PAT from the seeds down through the abscission zone (AZ) and this brings about the shedding of the fruitlet.
-
Background
Abscission is a coordinated process tightly regulated by
the interplay of several factors, among which auxin and
ethylene play a pivotal role [1,2]. Leaf deblading and
ethylene application lead to premature abscission of the
organ due to the disruption of the auxin flux and
activation of the abscission zone (AZ) at the base of the petiole
[3,4].
In the commonly accepted model, as demonstrated in the
Arabidopsis etr1-1, ethylene coordinates abscission. In
this mutant, flower abscission is significantly delayed
because the ethylene receptor (ETR1) is hampered in
ethylene binding activity, leading to partial ethylene
insensitivity. Although ethylene accelerates abscission, it is
strictly not necessary for shedding, indicating that a very
complex interplay of events control the process [5-7].
Indeed, it has been shown that ethylene-dependent and
independent pathways converge in determining flower
abscission [8].
fruitlet, down to the peduncle through the AZ into the
twig, depolarizes the weak auxin flows from the lateral
fruitlets causing their abscission [42].
It has also been postulated that prevention of abscission
requires a continuous and constant auxin transport
through the AZ [1]. Besides preventing abscission, auxin
regulates a tremendous number of processes, for instance
root meristem activity, organogenesis, and vascular tissue
differentiation [9-11]. Only recently the outstanding
complex mode of action of auxin has been partially unraveled
[12]. The most common auxin in plant, indol-3-acetic
acid (IAA), binds and is perceived by TIR1, an F-box
protein [13]. TIR1 interacts in the SCF complex to bring about
the degradation of Aux/IAA transcriptional regulators
[14]. These proteins are active repressors of auxin
responsive genes and are encoded by a large multigene family
[15]. Auxin applications enhance the transcript amount of
most of the Aux/IAAs in several species [16-19]. Another
enthralling field concerns auxin transport [20], which can
be classified as either polar (PAT) or non polar. However,
the PAT is acquiring ever-growing interest and may be the
most important means of auxin relocation [21]. IAA is
taken up into the cell by a combination of lipophilic
diffusion, symport via AUX and LAX (LIKE-AUX1)
permeases, and ATP-dependent transport by a P-glycoprotein
[22-25]. Auxin export is mediated by PIN-FORMED (PIN)
facilitators and by ATP activated PGPs
(Phosphoglycoproteins) [26-30]. PINs and PGPs were shown to characterize
coordinated and independent auxin transport
mechanisms, and function interactively in a tissue-specific
manner [31]. Nevertheless, the function of the PGPs is
nonspecific and mainly applies to auxin excess [32]. As a
matter of fact, it is the asymmetric cellular localization of PIN
proteins that determines the direction of the auxin flow
[20]. Although different PINs are implicated in specific
developmental processes, there seems to be redundancy
as indicated by the ectopic expression of PIN proteins in
some mutant combinations [20,33,34].
The modes of action of auxin and ethylene elucidated in
A. thaliana have been extended to other model species
such as tomato [35,36]. Yet, little is known about the
interactions between these two hormones during
abscission induction of organs other than debladed leaves or
senescing flowers. In particular, the apple cluster during
the immature fruit drop represents an ideal system to
study the shedding of actively growing organs [37]. At this
developmental stage, the shedding process involves
almost exclusively lateral fruitlets in which abscission is
preceded by an increase in ethylene biosynthesis and
sensitivity [38-40]. According to the correlative basis
reknown model the central fruitlet exerts a dominant
effect over lateral fruitlets because it is at a more advanced
stage of development [37,41]. As assessed by the
canalization theory the strong auxin flow coming from the central
Apical dominance is a complex physiological process
largely controlled by auxin and its interaction with two
additional hormones: cytokinins and MAX (more axillary
branching [43-45]. Cytokinins produced in the roots are
directed to organs (shoot apical meristems, fruits, etc)
whose sink strength is related to their ability in producing
and exporting auxin [46]. This process directs more
cytokinins which stimulate growth [47,48]. In the case of
apical dominance of shoot meristems, lateral bud outgrowth
occurs when the auxin flow from the apex is hampered,
dominance is weakened, and cytokinins are redirected to
axillary meristems [43,44]. Besides the main cytokinin
stream coming from the roots, the hormone can also be
produced in other tissues. For instance, following
decapitation, a prompt increase in transcripts for the key enzyme
in cytokinin biosynthesis, adenosine
phosphate-isopentenyltransferase, occurs in the stem xylem [49]. The
cytokinins produced here may then be translocated into the
axill (...truncated)