Management of the critically poisoned patient
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma,
Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
BioMed Central
Review
Open Access
Management of the critically poisoned patient
Jennifer S Boyle1, Laura K Bechtel1 and Christopher P Holstege*1,2
Address: 1Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia,
USA and 2Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Email: Jennifer S Boyle - ; Laura K Bechtel - ; Christopher P Holstege* -
* Corresponding author
Published: 29 June 2009
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2009, 17:29
doi:10.1186/1757-7241-17-29
Received: 28 March 2009
Accepted: 29 June 2009
This article is available from: http://www.sjtrem.com/content/17/1/29
© 2009 Boyle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background: Clinicians are often challenged to manage critically ill poison patients. The clinical
effects encountered in poisoned patients are dependent on numerous variables, such as the dose,
the length of exposure time, and the pre-existing health of the patient. The goal of this article is to
introduce the basic concepts for evaluation of poisoned patients and review the appropriate
management of such patients based on the currently available literature.
Methods: An unsystematic review of the medical literature was performed and articles pertaining
to human poisoning were obtained. The literature selected was based on the preference and clinical
expertise of authors.
Discussion: If a poisoning is recognized early and appropriate testing and supportive care is
initiated rapidly, the majority of patient outcomes will be good. Judicious use of antidotes should
be practiced and clinicians should clearly understand the indications and contraindications of
antidotes prior to administration.
Introduction
Poisoning emergencies commonly present to emergency
departments. The clinical effects encountered in poisoned
patients are dependent on numerous variables, such as
the dose, the length of exposure time, and the pre-existing
health of the patient. If a poisoning is recognized early
and appropriate supportive care is initiated rapidly, the
majority of patient outcomes will be good. The goal of
this article is to introduce the basic concepts for evaluation and appropriate management of the poisoned
patient.
Resuscitation/Initial management
The initial approach for evaluating the critically poisoned
patient centers on thorough assessment, appropriate stabilization and supportive care [1]. It is important to consider a broad differential diagnosis that includes both
toxicological and non-toxicological emergencies to avoid
prematurely excluding potentially serious conditions. For
example, an obtunded patient who smells of alcohol
could also be harboring an intracranial hemorrhage and
an agitated patient believed to be anticholinergic may in
fact be encephalopathic due to a metabolic or infectious
illness.
Aggressive resuscitation is often required for the patient
presenting with a toxicologic emergency. This follows a
standard "ABC" approach with attention to "airway,
breathing and circulation" respectively. The critically poisoned patient may present with central nervous system
(CNS) depression or coma necessitating intubation in
order to adequately protect the airway and reduce aspiration risk. Ventilatory drive may also be impaired resulting
in CO2 narcosis with subsequent acidosis and mental staPage 1 of 11
(page number not for citation purposes)
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2009, 17:29 http://www.sjtrem.com/content/17/1/29
tus deterioration which may further increase risk for aspiration. Often this deterioration can be unrecognized in
the patient placed on high flow oxygen because O2 saturation measures may remain adequate despite significant
ventilatory failure. In assessing and managing circulatory
status, appropriate intravenous access is essential. All
severely poisoned patients should have at least one large
bore peripheral intravenous catheter, and hypotensive
patients should have a second intravenous line placed in
either the peripheral or central circulation. Should vasopressor support be required, attention should be given to
the specific poison as the mechanism producing hypotension may help direct the vasopressor selection. Agents
with peripheral alpha antagonism, such as the atypical
antipsychotic olanzapine, may respond well to direct
alpha stimulation with phenylephrine [1]. Severe hypotension from tricyclic antidepressants, believed to be in
part caused by depletion of biogenic amines, may respond
to repletion with a direct alpha agonist such as norepinephrine when other agents such as the mixed alpha agonist
dopamine have been ineffective [2].
Diagnostic approach
Toxidromes
Identification of the constellation of signs and symptoms
that define a specific toxicologic syndrome, or "toxidrome", may narrow a differential diagnosis to a specific
class of poisons [3]. Descriptions of selected toxidromes
may be found in Table 1. Many toxidromes have several
overlapping features. For example, anticholinergic findings are highly similar to sympathomimetic findings, with
one exception being the effects on sweat glands: anticholinergic agents produce warm, flushed dry skin, while
sympathomimetic produce diaphoresis. Toxidrome findings may also be affected by individual variability, comorbid conditions, and co-ingestants. For example, tachycardia associated with sympathomimetic or anticholin-
ergic toxidromes may be absent in a patient who is
concurrently taking beta antagonist medications. Additionally, while toxidromes may be applied to classes of
drugs, some individual agents within these classes may
have one or more toxidrome findings absent. For
instance, meperidine is an opiate analgesic, but does not
induce miosis that helps define the "classic" opiate toxidrome. When accurately identified, the toxidrome may provide invaluable information for diagnosis and subsequent
treatment, although the many limitations impeding acute
toxidrome diagnosis must be carefully considered.
Hyperthermic syndromes
Toxin induced hyperthermia syndromes include sympathomimetic fever, uncoupling syndrome, serotonin
syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, malignant
hyperthermia, and anticholinergic poisonings [4]. Sympathomimetics, such as amphetamines and cocaine, may
produce hyperthermia due excess serotonin and
dopamine resulting in thermal deregulation [5]. Treatment is primarily supportive and may include active cooling and administration of benzodiazepine agents.
Un (...truncated)