Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Population-Based, Case-Control Study
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Alicja Wolk 0 2 3
Christos S. Mantzoros 0 2 3
Swen-Olof Andersson 0 2 3
Reinhold Bergstr om 0 2 3
Lisa B. Signorello 0 2 3
Pagona Lagiou 0 2 3
Hans-Olov Adami 0 2 3
Dimitrios Trichopoulos 0 1 2 3
0 Oxford University Press
1 Affiliations of authors: A. Wolk, R. Bergstro m, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden; C. S. Mantzoros , De- partment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Pub- lic Health, and Division of Endocrinology, Beth Is- rael Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA; P. Lagiou , Department of Epi- demiology, Harvard School of Public Health; S.-O. Andersson, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Urology , O
2 Journal of the National Cancer Institute , Vol. 90, No. 12, June 17, 1998
3 Supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer So- ciety and O
-
Background: Recent epidemiologic
investigations have suggested an
association between increased blood levels of
insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)
and increased risk of prostate cancer.
Our goal was to determine whether
an association exists between serum
levels of IGF-1 and one of its binding
proteins, insulin-like growth
factorbinding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and
prostate cancer risk. Methods: An
immunoradiometric assay was used to quantify
IGF-1 levels and IGFBP-3 levels in
serum samples as part of a
populationbased, casecontrol study in Sweden.
The study population comprised 210
patients with newly diagnosed,
untreated prostate cancer and 224
frequency-matched control subjects. Data
were analyzed by use of unconditional
logistic regression to calculate odds
ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence
intervals (CIs). Reported P values are
twosided. Results: The mean serum IGF-1
level for case patients (158.4 ng/mL)
was significantly higher than that for
c o n t r o l s u b j e c t s ( 1 4 7 . 4 n g / m L )
(P = .02); corresponding mean serum
IGFBP-3 levels were not significantly
different between case patients (2668
ng/mL) and control subjects (2518 ng/
mL) (P = .09). We found a moderately
strong and statistically significant
(P = .04) positive association between
serum levels of IGF-1 levels and risk of
prostate cancer (OR = 1.51; 95% CI =
1.02.26 per 100 ng/mL increment); the
association was particularly strong for
men younger than 70 years of age (OR
= 2.93; 95% CI = 1.435.97). No
association was found between serum
IGF-1 levels and disease stage. Serum
IGFBP-3 levels were not significantly
associated with increased risk of
disease, and adjustment for IGFBP-3 had
little effect on the association between
IGF-1 levels and risk of prostate
cancer. Conclusion: Elevated serum IGF-1
levels may be an important predictor of
risk for prostate cancer. However, our
results do not support an important
role for serum IGFBP-3 as a predictor
of risk for this disease. [J Natl Cancer
Inst 1998;90:9115]
Until recently, the search for endocrine
factors that may be involved in prostate
carcinogenesis has focused on sex steroid
hormones and on sex hormone-binding
globulin. Although supported by animal
studies (1), epidemiologic investigations
have not unequivocally supported the
hypothesis that sex hormones and their
associated receptors and/or binding proteins
are the most important endocrine factors
involved in prostate cancer (24).
Therefore, it is likely that other factors are
involved in development of the disease.
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)
has mitogenic and antiapoptotic effects on
prostate epithelial cells in vitro (5,6).
These results prompted epidemiologic
studies to determine the role of IGF-1 in
human prostate carcinogenesis. In a study
of 52 prostate cancer patients and an
equal number of control subjects in
Greece, Mantzoros et al. (7) reported that
increased serum IGF-1 level (by an
increment of about one standard deviation; 60
ng/mL in their study) was associated with
a doubling of the disease risk. Chan et al.
(8) also determined that an increased risk
of prostate cancer was associated with
increased blood levels of IGF-1 in a nested
casecontrol study within the Physicians
Health Study, using prospectively
collected blood samples from 152 case
subjects and 152 control subjects. Chan et al.
also found that one major circulating
IGF1-binding protein, insulin-like growth
factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), after
adjustment for IGF-1, was inversely related
to the risk of prostate cancer. They
attributed this effect to the reduction of
bioavailable IGF-1 with increasing levels of
IGFBP-3. If the association between
increased serum levels of IGF-1 and
increased prostate cancer risk were
confirmed by independent investigations, this
relationship could represent an important
finding with considerable diagnostic and
therapeutic value.
To study the association of IGF-1 and
IGFBP-3 serum levels with prostate
cancer risk, we made use of data from a large,
population-based, casecontrol study in
Sweden consisting of newly diagnosed
prostate cancer cases that were
cytologically and histologically confirmed.
Subjects and Methods
All men under the age of 80 years, born in
Sweden and living in O rebro County, Sweden, at any
time from January 1989 through September 1991,
formed the study base. Patients in this population
with newly diagnosed prostate cancers,
cytologically and histologically confirmed, were eligible to
participate in the study. Clinical records from the
three participating hospitals ( Orebro Medical Center
and hospitals in Karlskoga and Lindesberg) and the
Department of Pathology at Orebro Medical Center
allowed complete case ascertainment, confirmed
through cross-checking the clinical records of case
subjects with the regional cancer registry (9,10). All
tumors were staged clinically in accordance with the
tumornodemetastasis classification system (11);
among them, 26.6% were surgically staged. Control
subjects were identified contemporaneously with
case subjects. Selected every 3rd month from the
county population register, control subjects were
frequency-matched to case subjects in 10-year age
groups. All potential control subjects underwent a
digital rectal examination by one of us (S.-O.
Andersson). Men with a palpable nodule and/or
serum levels of prostate-specific antigen higher than
10 ng/mL underwent further diagnostic testing
through ultrasound-guided biopsy (four to six
random samples). If interpretation of the initial biopsy
specimens failed to confirm a diagnosis of cancer,
the procedure was repeated 6 months later. Only
those individuals whose biopsy specimens showed
no evidence of cancer were deemed eligible as
control subjects (10). Less than 3% of potential control
subjects who were diagnosed with cancer by
analysis of tissue obtained through biopsy were included
in the current study as case subjects. Subjects
eligible for the study were mailed a food-frequency
questionnaire for self-administration at home. A
majority of prostate cancer patients receive (...truncated)