Recommendations on how to ensure the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in Latin America: a point of view
Recommendations on how to ensure the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in Latin America: a point of view
Carlos Pineda 0 2 3 4 5
Carlo V. Caballero-Uribe 0 2 3 4 5
Marcia Gonclaves de Oliveira 0 2 3 4 5
Pedro Saul Lipszyc 0 2 3 4 5
Jose Julian Lopez 0 2 3 4 5
Marcelo Mario Mataos Moreira 0 2 3 4 5
Valderilio Feijo Azevedo 0 2 3 4 5
0 C. V. Caballero-Uribe Universidad del Norte , Barranquilla , Colombia
1 ) Research Direction, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion , Mexico City , Mexico
2 V. F. Azevedo Federal University of Parana , Curitiba , Brazil
3 J. J. Lopez Centro de Informacion Medicamentos de la Universidad Nacional (CIMUN) , Bogota D.C. , Colombia
4 P. S. Lipszyc Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, University of Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires , Argentina
5 M. M. Mataos Moreira
The use of biotechnology-derived medicines has significantly increased in recent decades. Although biosimilars undergo rigorous characterization as well as clinical studies to document their safety and effectiveness, they are highly complex molecules and small changes in the purification and production process of a biosimilar can have major implications in its safety and effectiveness profile. In Latin America, regulatory authorities have begun to establish welldescribed and standardized pathways that permit a biosimilar to gain commercial licensure. In order to be certain that a biosimilar reaches its potential in ordinary clinical use, an intensive post-licensing monitoring system must be established since it is the only means to ascertain the true similarity between the original biologic and its biosimilar. Pharmacovigilance allows national authorities to determine a drug's performance in the marketplace. An effective tracking and pharmacovigilance system for biological medicines has many steps and processes. To aid policy makers in Latin American in addressing the many issues surrounding the establishment of an effective pharmacovigilance system, the Americas Health Foundation convened a group of experts to discuss the topic and develop recommendations for implementation. The group discussed current challenges and gaps in pharmacovigilance in Latin America, paying close attention to the major issues associated with traceability and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars following their approval. The recommendations developed should enable countries to accurately document the safety and performance of a biosimilar as experienced by patients under real-life conditions and have a significant impact on the successful implementation of pharmacovigilance of biosimilars throughout the region.
Biosimilars; Naming; Pharmacovigilance; Surveillance; Traceability
-
The use of biotechnology-derived medicines has increased
dramatically in recent decades. As these products have come
off patent protection, presumed biochemical and
therapeutically equivalent products have been developed and have been
termed biosimilars [1]. That is, a biosimilar is a biologic
product that can be expected to produce the same therapeutic effect
in any given patient had the original, or innovator, biologic
medicine been given. Thus, biosimilars are considered to be
similar in efficacy and safety to their reference products and as
such are gaining widespread acceptance as suitably
interchangeable medicines [2].
Although biosimilars undergo rigorous characterization as
well as clinical studies to document their safety and
effectiveness, the fact remains that they are highly complex biological
molecules. Small changes in the production and purification
process of a biological can have major implications in its
safety and effectiveness profile [3]. Therefore, not only is
thorough pre-clinical and clinical testing critical but
demonstrating the true similarity of a biosimilar to its original product
also requires careful documentation in post-marketing studies.
The ability to trace and track a medicine introduced into the
marketplace is essential. When given to large numbers of
patients, it is not uncommon to document safety issues that were
not seen in the controlled trials necessary for licensure. This is
particularly important for biosimilars because of their
multifaceted manufacturing processes and because, as stated above,
it is not unreasonable to expect that there may be subtle
differences in composition between a biosimilar and its reference
product. Such differences may be revealed in an altered safety
and effectiveness profile that is only detected when the
medicine gains widespread use.
In Latin America, regulatory authorities have begun to
establish well-described and standardized pathways that allow a
biosimilar to gain commercial licensure [1, 4]. In order to be
certain that a biosimilar achieves its potential in ordinary
clinical use, an intensive post-licensing monitoring system must
be established since it is the sole means to ascertain the true
similarity between the original biologic and its biosimilar.
Unfortunately, few Latin American countries have such systems
actively working to capture the relevant information.
Pharmacovigilance (also known as surveillance) allows
national authorities to determine a drugs performance in the
m a r k e t p l a c e . T h e f i r s t c o m p o n e n t o f a n e ff e c t i v e
pharmacovigilance system is the ability to track the medicine
from manufacture to distribution to prescription. Then, there
must be a system of pharmacovigilance that encourages and is
able to document all adverse events that may be associated
with the use of the medicine. Finally, the data derived from
such reports must be carefully analyzed and reported to health
professionals as well as to the manufacturer [57].
An effective tracking and pharmacovigilance system for
biological medicines has many steps and processes. To aid
policy makers in Latin American countries in addressing the
major issues surrounding the establishment of an effective
pharmacovigilance system, the Americas Health Foundation
convened a group of experts to discuss the topic and develop
recommendations for implementation. The group discussed
the current challenges and gaps in pharmacovigilance in Latin
America, paying close attention to the major issues associated
with the traceability and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars
following their approval. The recommendations presented
below should enable countries to document accurately the safety
and performance of a biosimilar as experienced by patients
under real-life conditions.
The name of the product is the foundation of product
identification and is therefore absolutely essential for accurate
record keeping and the subsequent attribution of adverse events.
Currently, under the WHOs International Nonproprietary
Name (INN) policy, the INN for a new biosimilar may be
the same as that of the original biologic medicine. In such a
case, if only the INN, without a distinguishable identifier, is
used when prescribing a biologic medicine, an adverse event
may be diff (...truncated)