Classical appetitive conditioning in the pigeon
Classical appetitive conditioning in the pigeon
Nicholas Lcmllo. Suzanne- KI"mpay and M. E. Bitterman
BRYN MA WR COLI.£GE
."bstract
Pigeons were trained in an appetitive conditioning
situation (CS paired with the presentation of food). The
CS- US interval was 1 sec. for one group and 10 sec. for
another. Stabilimetric measures of anticipatory activity showed better conditioning at the longer interval.
Probl"m
Interest in broadening the phyletic base of research on classical conditioning has led us to explore a phenomenon of appetitive conditioning in
the pigeon which has been known for at least 40
years (Razran, 1933): a signal paired with the
presentation of food may soon come to evoke anticipatory activity .which can be detected stabilimetrically. We describe here an improved
technique for the study of this phenomenon and
some illustrative first results on the role of the
CS-US interval.
A ventilated picnic chest is divided into two compartments by an opaque Plexiglas partition. S's compartment is about 11 in. long, 11 in. wide, and 13 in. high.
The floor of the compartment is a spring-mounted
platform, to one end of which is fixed a thin rod that
runs through a hole in the partition into the needleholder of a crystal phonograph cartridge on the other
Side. The cartridge is mounted on its edge in a shielding enclosure fixed to the bottom ofthe chest. To S, the
partition displays two house lights (7.5 w Christmas
tree bulbs) and a feeding tray of clear Plexiglas into
which an ounce or so of mixed grain can be discharged
from a hopper by the action of a solenoid: hopper and
solenoid are mounted behind the partition. Below the
feeder-tray is a feeder light (a 7.5 w Christmas tree
bulb) which illuminates the tray as the grain is discharged. The CS is compound: offset ofthe house lights
and onset of a buzzer. When the scheduled CS- US interval has elapsed, the feeder solenoid is activated and
the feeder light flashes briefly, whereupon the house
lights are turned on again and the buzzer is turned off.
To measure S's activity during the CS- US interval and
during control periods of no stimulation, the output of
the phonograph cartridge, suitably amplified and integrated,' is used to drive a relay which in turn operates
a printing counter or (when the temporal distribution
of response is of interest) an event recorder. The
graphiC records closely resemble those made by
Pavlov (1927, facingp.32),eachpiprepresentinga unit
of activity rather than a drop of saliva. All the events
1
A circuit diagram will be provided on request.
Psyclwn. Sci., 1964, Vol. 1.
of the experiment are programmed automatically. Two
Ss, each in a separate chamber, are studied concurrently.
In the present experiment, 20 experimentally naive ,
but thoroughly tamed White Carneaux cocks were studied. After their body weights had been reduced gradually to 85% of prefeeding levels, the Ss were fed for
several successive days from the trays of the conditioning chambers. Then the experiment proper was begun. There were 10 reinforced trials per day with a
mean intertrial interval of 15 min. (varying from 7-22
min.). One group of 10 Ss had nine training trials on
which the CS- US interval was 1 sec., and one test trial
(its position in the daily series varying systematically
from S to S and from day to day) on which the CS-US
interval was 40 sec. A second group of 10 Ss was treated in exactly the same way, except that the CS- US interval on the nine training trials was 10 sec. The two
groups were compared in terms, of response to the CS
on the 40 sec. test trials, during which graphic records
were made. GraphiC records of response also were
made during 40 sec . control periods of no stimulation
which provided estimates of basal activity. One basal
activity measurement was made for each S in each experimental session, the point at which it was made in
the session varying from S to S and from day to day.
Training continued for 16 days.
Be-suits
Mean response to the CS in the 10 sec. group
increased in negatively accelerated fashion,
reaching asymptote by Day 11 or 12. Response to
the CS increased somewhat in the 1 sec. group,
as did the basal level of activity in both groups.
w
4
o
CS 10 SEC."
::J
I-
~3
«
~
w
~2
I SEC.
~CS
oa..
(f)
w
0--
z
«
ACT 10 SEC.........
e.._-.-_..e--"'' ...... - .....
0::
w
~
o
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
CS-DURATION (SEC.)
Fig. 1. Response to the CS on 40 sec. test trials and
during 40 sec. periods of no stimulation (ACT) in
groups trained with CS-US intervals of 1 or 10 sec.
19
For the 10 sec. group, there was a marked difference between level of response to the CS and level
of basal activity, but in the 1 sec. group there was
no such difference. These relationships may be
seen in Fig. 1, which shows mean magnitudes of
response in successive 5 sec. segments of the 40
sec. test trials (CS) and the 40 sec. periods of no
stimulation (ACT). The curves are based on the
pooled data of the last five days (Days 12-16) of
the experiment, during which time the level of
response was quite constant from day to day. No
elaborate statistical tests are required to show
the effect of CS-US interval. For the 1 sec. group,
the distributions of ACT and CS scores overlapped extensively, with mean ACT slightly higher than mean CS. For the 10 sec. group, there
was no overlapping at all; each of the 10 Ss ~ad
higher CS than ACT scores. Furthermore, there
was no overlap in the distributions of CS scores
for the two groups..
DilH'ussiou
Better conditioning with a CS-US interval of 10
sec. as compared with 1 sec. is not what we
should have been led to expect by the familiar
textbook generalization, based primarily on work
with mammals, that level of conditioning declines
as the CS-US interval increases beyond an optimal value of about half a second. Nor are the
results in accord with those of recent experiments on avoidance conditioning in the goldfish
which yield a function that is essentially flat
over intervals from 1-30 sec. (Behrend and Bitterman, 1962, 1964). Whether these discrepancies are due to species, or method, or both cannot, of course, be said until the two variables are
unconfounded. A possibility to be considered
carefully is that much ofthe activity that develops
in the appetitive situation is instrumental in
character--a product of adventitious reinforcement (Skinner, 1945)--the 10 sec. interval af-
20
fording more opportunity than the 1 sec. inverval
for its development. That general activity ofthe
kind measured in this experiment can be brought
under instrumental control has already been
demonstrated (Graf and Bitterman, 1962). In any
case, the diversity of outcome which is now beginning to appear in experiments on the CS-US
interval suggests that more attention must be
given to parameters such as species and method.
Summary
Two groups of pigeons were trained in an appetitive conditioning situation, the CS being paired with the presentation of food. For on (...truncated)