Detection of antibodies to varicella-zoster virus in recipients of the varicella vaccine by using a luciferase immunoprecipitation system assay.
Detection of Antibodies to Varicella-Zoster Virus in Recipients of the
Varicella Vaccine by Using a Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System
Assay
Jeffrey I. Cohen,a Mir A. Ali,a Ahmad Bayat,b Sharon P. Steinberg,c Hosun Park,d Anne A. Gershon,c Peter D. Burbeloe
Medical Virology Section, Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USAa;
Department of Perioperative Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USAb; Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of
Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USAc; Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University,
Daegu, South Koread; Dental Clinical Research Core, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USAe
A high-throughput test to detect varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibodies in varicella vaccine recipients is not currently available.
One of the most sensitive tests for detecting VZV antibodies after vaccination is the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen
(FAMA) test. Unfortunately, this test is labor-intensive, somewhat subjective to read, and not commercially available. Therefore,
we developed a highly quantitative and high-throughput luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay to detect antibody
to VZV glycoprotein E (gE). Tests of children who received the varicella vaccine showed that the gE LIPS assay had 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity, a viral capsid antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) had 67% and 87% specificity, and a
glycoprotein ELISA (not commercially available in the United States) had 94% sensitivity and 74% specificity compared with the
FAMA test. The rates of antibody detection by the gE LIPS and glycoprotein ELISA were not statistically different. Therefore, the
gE LIPS assay may be useful for detecting VZV antibodies in varicella vaccine recipients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00921999.)
V
aricella-zoster virus (VZV) causes both chickenpox and zoster. A live attenuated varicella vaccine derived from the Oka
strain of the virus was developed by Takahashi and colleagues in
the 1970s and was licensed for routine use in the United States in
1995. One of the most sensitive tests for detecting VZV antibodies
after vaccination is the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen
(FAMA) test. For this test, serial dilutions of human serum are
incubated with live VZV-infected human fibroblasts, incubated
with fluorescein-tagged anti-human immunoglobulin, and examined by fluorescence microscopy (1). The test detects antibodies to
surface glycoproteins on live VZV-infected cells. While the FAMA
test is highly predictive of protection from varicella infection after
vaccination (2), the test is labor-intensive and somewhat subjective to read. Therefore, the FAMA assay is not applicable for largescale or commercial testing, nor is it readily available.
Most laboratories use commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to determine VZV seropositivity. A
comparison of the commercially available ELISA with the FAMA
test in recipients of the varicella vaccine indicates that the ELISA
has a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 89% (3) (assuming that
the FAMA has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Thus, the
ELISA is not considered sufficiently sensitive for reliably detecting
antibodies after varicella immunization. Several studies have reported failures to seroconvert after immunization even after 2
doses, based on ELISA (4), and these are thought to represent a
failure to detect antibody responses rather than a failure of the
vaccine.
Modified FAMA tests have been developed, including ones
that use fixed cells (5) and a flow cytometry-based FAMA assay
using virus-infected cells (6). The fixed-cells test is subjective to
read, and the flow cytometry-based test uses live virus-infected
cells; however, neither test is commercially available. Other tests
have been developed in an attempt to replace the FAMA test. A
1288
cvi.asm.org
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
glycoprotein (gp) ELISA containing purified VZV-infected cell
glycoproteins (including gE, gB, and gH) was developed by Merck
to measure antibodies after vaccination (7); however, this test is
not commercially available. In a recent study in Europe (8), a
different commercially available gpELISA and a whole-cell ELISA
had 92% and 96% sensitivity, respectively, compared to that of the
FAMA test for detecting VZV antibodies in vaccine recipients. A
time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) showed 83%
sensitivity and 88% specificity in vaccine recipients compared
with those of the FAMA test (9). A comparison of a latex agglutination test, which is no longer marketed, with the FAMA test in
recipients of the varicella vaccine indicated that the latex agglutination assay had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 94% (3).
Serological testing after vaccination is not recommended, because commercially available tests are not sensitive enough to detect antibodies and may lack specificity (10, 11). Concerns persist
about vaccine responses in women who may become pregnant
and in health care workers, especially those who care for patients
with varicella and zoster infection. All of these individuals have an
increased risk for developing severe varicella infection. Therefore,
a sensitive and specific reliable test for measuring VZV antibodies
on a large-scale basis would be clinically useful. We developed a
new assay based on a highly quantitative immunoprecipitation
Received 24 April 2014 Returned for modification 10 June 2014
Accepted 29 June 2014
Published ahead of print 2 July 2014
Editor: S. A. Plotkin
Address correspondence to Jeffrey I. Cohen, .
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
doi:10.1128/CVI.00250-14
p. 1288 –1291
September 2014 Volume 21 Number 9
Antibodies to VZV in Vaccine Recipients
assay format (12) and compared it to the standard ELISA, FAMA
test, and gpELISA for VZV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects. Serum samples were obtained from three sources, and all assays
were performed in a blinded fashion. Archived serum from South Korea
and New York were anonymized, and the use of samples was deemed
exempt by the Office of Human Subjects Research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The subjects at NIH gave informed consent and the
study (ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00921999) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The initial cohort of 40 samples from New
York included 11 serum samples from healthy patients (mostly adults)
obtained prior to developing varicella infection (all with negative FAMA
titers), 11 serum samples from patients after proven varicella infe (...truncated)