Walking the Fine Line between Science and Culture
Drug Saf (2015) 38:769–771
DOI 10.1007/s40264-015-0324-6
COMMENTARY
Walking the Fine Line between Science and Culture
Lee P. Shulman1,2,3
Published online: 15 July 2015
Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Our abilities to evaluate pregnant women for fetal abnormalities have greatly expanded seemingly overnight as
result of advances mostly facilitated by the completion of
the Human Genome Project. From the incorporation of
cell-free nucleic acid technologies into screening algorithms for fetal chromosomal and select genomic abnormalities to the increasing use of microarrays to detect
cytogenetic and genomic abnormalities from amniotic fluid
or chorionic villus samples, our capabilities to detect fetal
abnormalities have markedly improved over the past
5 years. When combining these improved molecular
diagnostics with improving imaging technologies and
expertise, we can now accurately detect a wide range of
fetal abnormalities, many of which were not detectable a
decade ago.
However, before we congratulate ourselves on our
accomplishments, it is equally important to recognize that
our advancements in diagnostics have not kept pace with
This is a commentary on the paper by Neogi et al. ‘‘Indigenous
medicine use for sex selection during pregnancy and risk of
congenital malformations: a population-based case-control study in
Haryana, India,’’ doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0309-5.
& Lee P. Shulman
;
1
Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern
University, Chicago, IL, USA
2
Department of Pharmacognosy and Medicine Chemistry,
University of Illinois, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL,
USA
3
Prentice Women’s Hospital, 250 E. Superior Street,
Room 05-2174, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
our understanding of the etiologies of many, if not most
fetal abnormalities. Indeed, the long-standing struggle of
genetics vs. environment has actually never been more
complicated and blurred. It seems that as we learn more
about genetic and epigenetic phenomena, the dogma that
has supported our beliefs concerning etiology of fetal
anomalies becomes weaker and weaker, leaving us with
improved abilities to detect these problems but with a far
less definitive understanding of what causes these problems, and thus a seemingly increasing inability to offer
sage advice to prevent such problems in the future.
Certain conditions such as Mendelian disorders are
clearly genetic in nature whereas fetal anomalies resulting
from prenatal exposure to teratogenetic agents such as
thalidomide and alcohol are mostly mediated by environmental exposure, though the phenotypic expression of such
conditions are also impacted by genetic and genomic factors. Indeed, the impact of novel cultural practices,
including the ingestion or avoidance of certain foods and
medicines before and during pregnancy, can impact fetal
development and well-being as is evident in the paper
‘‘Indigenous medicine use during pregnancy for sex
selection and risk of congenital malformations: a population-based case-control study in Haryana, India’’ by Sutapa
B. Neogi and colleagues, published in this edition of Drug
Safety [1].
It is important to accept the notion that culture-specific
practices are not automatically bad, harmful, or unnecessary; we tend to consider current approaches to healthcare
invariably superior to those from even 20 years ago,
let alone those that date back centuries or millennia.
However, we should all take a collective deep breath and
consider the very recent pharmacotherapeutic advancement
in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
770
aureus, a drug-resistant microbe that has become increasingly resistant to more antibiotics over the past several
years. What is the recent breakthrough in the treatment of
MRSA? A ninth century treatment for eye infections found
in Bald’s Leechbook, written in Old English and presented
as a recipe consisting of garlic and onions, wine, and bile
from a cow’s stomach brewed in a brass cauldron and left
to sit for 9 days before use [2]. I am not sure that this
formulation is ready for a phase III trial in preparation for
approval by the US Food and Drug Administration or the
European Medicines Agency, but I am sure that a successful therapeutic approach for the treatment of MRSA
will save thousands of lives.
Therefore, old is not necessarily worse, and the practices
described in the paper by Neogi et al. are not restricted to
developing nations. In the US and elsewhere, pica refers to
cravings during pregnancy that lead to the consumption of
nonfood items such as starch and clay that can result in
maternal morbidity (e.g., anemia) and, depending on the
items consumed, adverse neonatal outcomes [3]. However,
in contradistinction to the practices reported by Neogi and
colleagues, pica refers to innate cravings by pregnant
women that can be influenced by societal or community
practices. Whereas the practice of ingesting ‘‘botanical
interventions’’ to ensure the delivery of a male child refers
to a cultural practice maintained by peer and societal
pressures and calls into question not just the ingestion of
toxic or teratogenetic substances but the concept of gender
as an abnormality.
One can read this paper and applaud the authors’
approach to demonstrating the clear teratogenetic impact
of the variety of indigenous medicines. In addition, one
must also applaud the authors for exposing a practice that
is not only biologically absurd, insofar as sex determination occurs at conception and cannot be altered after
conception, but also that it continues to this day. Furthermore, that continuation bespeaks an ongoing and even
more nefarious issue; specifically, that in Haryana, India,
measures must be taken, regardless of their cost, to
increase the likelihood of a male child. While not
specifically stated, this practice continues because a male
child has far more ‘‘value’’ than a female child in Haryana, India.
Many of us look at ritual and cultural practices as quaint,
arcane, or even ridiculous, many of which represent an
ancient ritual or response to natural phenomena or humanmade events that were not entirely understood by our
ancestors. From ritual tribal dances at solar eclipses to the
preparation of ceremonial meals, maintaining such practices despite the lack of the original context for their performance serves to honor the past and bring together
communities. Some may look at such practices as foreign
L. P. Shulman
and ethnocentric, especially when performed outside of the
communities in which they were developed. However,
acceptance of such practices and gaining an understanding
of their origins and meanings is an important part of integrating people of different beliefs and customs into society,
something that most communities in the developed world
are quickly learning.
However, sometimes such customs, though centuries
old, serve to harm the community and alienate people
within an (...truncated)