Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a TRIP-Aided Martensitic Steel
Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. (2015) 4:344–354
DOI 10.1007/s13632-015-0221-5
TECHNICAL ARTICLE
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a TRIP-Aided
Martensitic Steel
Koh-ichi Sugimoto1 • Ashok Kumar Srivastava2
Received: 28 May 2015 / Revised: 22 July 2015 / Accepted: 21 August 2015 / Published online: 3 September 2015
The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract This paper deals with the microstructural and
mechanical properties of a transformation-induced plasticity-aided martensitic (TM) steel that is expected to serve
as an advanced structural steel for automotive applications.
The microstructure consisted of a wide lath-martensitestructured matrix and a mixture of narrow lath-martensite
and metastable retained austenite of 2–5 vol% (MA-like
phase). When 1%Cr and 1%Cr–0.2%Mo were added into
0.2%C–1.5%Si–1.5%Mn steel to enhance its hardenability,
the resultant TM steels achieved a superior cold formability, toughness, fatigue strength, and delayed fracture
strength as compared to conventional structural steel such
as SCM420. These enhanced mechanical properties were
found to be mainly caused by (1) plastic relaxation of the
stress concentration, which resulted from expansion strain
on the strain-induced transformation of the metastable
retained austenite, and (2) the presence of a large quantity
of a finely dispersed MA-like phase, which suppressed
crack initiation or void formation and subsequent void
coalescence.
Keywords Automotive applications Microstructure
Mechanical property TRIP-aided martensitic steel
Retained austenite Microalloying
& Koh-ichi Sugimoto
1
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Shinshu
University, 4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano 380-8553, Japan
2
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, O. P. Jindal
University, Punjipathra, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 496001, India
123
Introduction
In the past decade, some advanced high-strength and ultrahigh-strength sheet steels (AHSS and AUHSS, respectively)
such as transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) [1] -aided
sheet steel [2–11], quench and partitioning steel [12, 13], and
twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steel [14] have been
developed in order to reduce the weight and improve the
impact safety of automobiles. General ultrahigh-strength
TRIP-aided steels such as TRIP-aided bainitic ferrite (TBF)
steel are produced by an isothermal transformation (IT)
process at a temperature above the martensite-start temperature (Ms) or at a temperature between Ms and the martensitefinish temperature (Mf) [6]. Sugimoto et al. [8] reported that
the microstructure of TBF steel changed to a wide lathmartensite matrix and a large amount of finely dispersed
narrow lath-martensite and metastable austenite (MA-like
phase) when the IT process was carried out at temperatures
lower than Mf. Such a TRIP-aided martensitic (TM) steel
attained a superior combination of tensile strength and
formability [8]. Combinations of tensile strength and total
elongation of some of the abovementioned AHSS and
AUHSS steels are controlled by the original volume fraction
of austenite and retained austenite, as shown in Fig. 1.
Because TM steel also possesses superior mechanical
properties such as toughness [15–17], fatigue strength [18,
19], and hydrogen embrittlement resistance [20] as compared to conventional structural steel (Fig. 2), application
of TM steel to automotive drivetrain components such as
gears, drive shafts, CV joints, clutch plates, etc. is expected
to reduce the weight and CO2 emission.
This paper introduces the microstructural and mechanical properties of C–Si–Mn TM steels with different C, Mn,
Cr, Mo, Ni, Nb, and B contents, which affect the hardenability of the steel, in order to assess the suitability of such
Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. (2015) 4:344–354
345
TSxTEl (GPa %)
100
80
40
20
TM
Mar.
20%Mn-3%Si-3%Al Aus.
TRIP/TWIP
60
TBF
TDP
0
0
5-10%Mn TRIP
Q&P
20
40
60
f (vol%)
80
100
0
Fig. 1 Relationship between a combination of the tensile strength
and total elongation (TS 9 TEl) and the original volume fraction of
austenite and retained austenite (fc0), in various TRIP and TWIP
steels. TDP TRIP-aided dual-phase steel, TBF TRIP-aided bainitic
ferrite steel, TM TRIP-aided martensitic steel, Q&P Quenching and
partitioning steel, Mar conventional martensitic steel, Aus austenitic
steel
Carburizing
property
Tensile strength
Conventional
martensitic steel
Cold
formability
Delayed fracture
strength
TM steel
Impact toughness
(Fracture toughness)
Notch fatigue
strength
Fig. 2 Comparison of the mechanical properties of TM steel and
conventional martensitic steel
steels for application to automotive structural parts and
drivetrain components.
Materials and Experimental Procedure
The chemical compositions of the steels used in this study
are listed in Table 1. Steel A is a base steel with a chemical
composition of 0.2%C, 1.5%Si, 1.5%Mn, and 0.05%Nb
(mass%). The addition of Mn, Cr, Mo, Ni, Nb, and/or B to
this created Steels B–H. In Steels I–M, Nb was omitted and
the carbon content was varied.
Figure 3 illustrates the heat-treatment diagram of TM
steel, which consisted of austenitizing followed by an
isothermal transformation (IT) process at temperatures
below the martensite-finish temperature (Mf). In some
instances, a final partitioning process was also conducted at
250–350 C for 1000 s in order to promote carbon
enrichment of the retained austenite.
The microstructures of the steels were observed by
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and field-emission
scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), which was performed using an instrument equipped with an electron
backscatter diffraction (EBSD) system. The steel specimens
for the FE-SEM–EBSD analyses were first ground with
alumina powder and colloidal silica, and then ion thinning
was performed.
The retained austenite characteristics of the steels were
evaluated by x-ray diffractometry. The volume fractions of
the retained austenite phases (fc, vol%) were quantified from
the integrated intensity of the (200)a, (211)a, (200)c,
(220)c, and (311)c peaks obtained by x-ray diffractometry
using Mo-Ka radiation [21]. The carbon concentrations (Cc,
mass%) of the retained austenite phases were estimated
from the empirical equation proposed by Dyson and Holmes
[22]. In this case, the lattice constant (ac, 90.1 nm) was
measured from the (200)c, (220)c, and (311)c peaks of CuKa radiation.
The tensile tests were performed at 298 K (25 C) using
a tensile testing machine under a crosshead speed of 1 mm/
min (resulting in a strain rate of 6.67 9 10-4 s-1).
Hole punch and hole expansion tests were carried out
using a graphite-type lubricant [8]. A hole with a diameter
of 4.76 mm was punched out at a punching rate of 10 mm/
min (at 25 C), with a clearance of 10% between the die
and the punch. Successive hole expansion tests were performed at 25 C using a 60 conical die at a punching rate
of 1 mm/min. (...truncated)