From Protecting the Heart to Improving Athletic Performance – the Benefits of Local and Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2015) 29:573–588
DOI 10.1007/s10557-015-6621-6
REVIEW ARTICLE
From Protecting the Heart to Improving Athletic Performance –
the Benefits of Local and Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning
Vikram Sharma 1,2 & Reuben Marsh 2 & Brian Cunniffe 3,4 & Marco Cardinale 4,5 &
Derek M. Yellon 2 & Sean M. Davidson 2
Published online: 19 October 2015
# The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is a noninvasive cardioprotective intervention that involves brief cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion. This is typically delivered by inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff on one or
more limb(s) for several cycles, each inflation-deflation being
3–5 min in duration. RIPC has shown potential for protecting
the heart and other organs from injury due to lethal ischemia
and reperfusion injury, in a variety of clinical settings. The
mechanisms underlying RIPC are under intense investigation
but are just beginning to be deciphered. Emerging evidence
suggests that RIPC has the potential to improve exercise performance, via both local and remote mechanisms. This review
discusses the clinical studies that have investigated the role of
RIPC in cardioprotection as well as those studying its applicability in improving athletic performance, while examining
the potential mechanisms involved.
Keywords Remote ischemic preconditioning . Exercise
performance . Sports . Cardioprotection .
Ischemia-reperfusion injury . CABG . PCI . Perconditioning .
Postconditioning . Acute kidney injury
* Sean M. Davidson
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH,
USA
2
The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, 67
Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK
3
English institute of Sport, Bisham, Marlow, UK
4
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, UCL, London, UK
5
Aspire Academy, Doha, Qatar
Abbreviations
AAR
AKI
AKT
AT 1 receptor
ATP
AUC
BP
CABG
CGRP
CK-MB
CRISP stent
cTnI
cTnT
CXCR4
ERICCA
ERIC-LYSIS
hs-cTnI
IPC
IR
KATP channels
kDa
MACE
MACCE
MERIT
MI
miRNA
mPTP
MRI
Area at risk
Acute kidney injury
Term used for protein kinase B
Angiotensin II receptor type 1
Adenosine triphosphate
Area under the curve
Blood pressure
Coronary artery bypass grafting
Calcitonin gene-related peptide
Creatine kinase-myocardial band
Cardiac remote ischemic preconditioning in
coronary stenting
Cardiac troponin I
Cardiac troponin I
Chemokine receptor type 4
Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning
on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing
coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Effect of remote ischemic conditioning in
heart attack patients
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I
Ischemic preconditioning
Ischemia and reperfusion
ATP-sensitive potassium channels
Kilodaltons
Major adverse cardiac events
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular
event
Myocardial event reduction with ischemic
preconditioning therapy
Myocardial infarction
micro- ribonucleic acid
Mitochondrial permeability transition pore
Magnetic resonance imaging
574
NSTEMI
PCI
PI3K
PKC
pPCI
RIPC
RIPercon
RIPostC
RIPOST-MI
RISK
SAFE
SDF=1 α
STAT
STEMI
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2015) 29:573–588
Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase
Protein kinase C
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Remote ischemic preconditioning
Remote ischemic perconditioning
Remote ischemic post conditioning
Remote ischemic post-conditioning in myocardial infarction
Reperfusion injury salvage kinase
Survivor activating factor enhancement
Stromal cell-derived factor 1
Signal transducer and activator of
transcription
ST elevation myocardial infarction
Introduction
Ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) is a phenomenon in which
transient episodes of ischemia and reperfusion administered to
an organ attenuate the lethal cellular injury sustained from a
subsequent, prolonged ischaemic insult of the same organ.
IPC was first described in a study by Murray et al. in 1986
[1], in which, the hearts of anaesthetized dogs were
preconditioned with four 5 min occlusions of the circumflex
artery, each separated by 5 min of reperfusion. This was
followed by a sustained 40 min occlusion and 4 days of reperfusion. The extent of myocardial infarction in the
preconditioned hearts was found to be dramatically reduced
to a mere 25 % of that seen in the control hearts which did not
receive preconditioning [1]. Later, IPC was also shown to
have the ability to prevent lethal ischemia and reperfusion injury in skeletal muscles, and to protect the endothelium [2, 3].
Subsequently, the intriguing observation was made that
protection of the heart could also be achieved by applying
cycles of brief ischemia, alternating with reperfusion, to a
tissue or organ remote from the heart - a concept named remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC). A crucial intermediate step towards the discovery of RIPC was made by
Przyklenk et al. [4] in 1993, who demonstrated that preconditioning the territory of the heart supplied by the circumflex
coronary artery also reduced the size of the infarct arising from
the subsequent occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. They called this phenomenon “preconditioning at
a distance” [4]. This was followed by studies showing that
preconditioning of the heart could be achieved by applying
the brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion to a remote
organ such as the kidney or other abdominal visceral organs
[5, 6]. Birnbaum et al. made the critical observation that RIPC
could also be applied to the limb. In their experiments, they
combined brief cycles of blood flow restriction with electrical
stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the same limb in
order to induce demand ischemia [7]. When applied prior to
sustained coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion, this intervention reduced infarct size by more than 65 % [7].
Kharbanda et al. were the first to demonstrate that the application of an RIPC stimulus without the need for electrical
stimulation, reduced the extent of myocardial infarction invivo in pigs, and also attenuated endothelial injury in humans
[8]. This study paved the way for the clinical application of
RIPC by recognising the possibility of a non-invasive method
of protecting the heart against lethal IR injury. Other studies
demonstrated that in addition to protecting the heart, limb
RIPC can also protect other organs including the kidneys,
lungs, brain, and liver [9], as well as the endothelium [10]
from injury caused by sustained ischemia and reperfusion.
In addition to the benefits of IPC and RIPC on the heart and
the endothelium, both in terms of increased resistance to ischaemic injury and preservation of function in the face of ischemia and reperfusion, it has been hypothesised that IPC applied
to the limb may have the potential to improve exercise performance via both local effects (i.e.,: to the limb) and remote
effects (via the cardiovasc (...truncated)