Influenza A Virus Diversity and Transmission in Exhibition Swine
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
Influenza A Virus Diversity and Transmission in
Exhibition Swine
Tatiana Baranovich1 and Justin Bahl2
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; and 2Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science
Center at Houston
(See the major article by Nelson et al on pages 173–82.)
Keywords.
evolution; influenza A virus; pigs; reassortment; swine; agricultural fair.
Received and accepted 24 July 2015; published online 4
August 2015.
Correspondence: J. Bahl, Center for Infectious Diseases,
School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health
Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler St, Houston, TX
77030 ().
The Journal of Infectious Diseases® 2016;213:169–70
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press for
the Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open
Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits
non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in
any medium, provided the original work is not altered or
transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited.
For commercial re-use, contact .
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv400
agricultural fairs in North America annually, allowing for considerable contact
with live swine [5]. This is more than for
any other interface in the United States.
Furthermore, agricultural fairs allow for
prolonged commingling of pigs from numerous breeders and multiple states. Collectively, these contacts create an environment
conducive to zoonotic transmission, potential for viral reassortment with other strains,
and geographic spread of influenza A viruses to new regions. Yet, surveillance, risk
assessment, and evolutionary studies of
IAV-S at the domestic swine-human interface have been conducted mainly in commercial swine [6–10], and little is known
about the diversity of influenza A viruses
circulating in exhibition swine. While control measures addressing activities before,
during, and after swine exhibitions [11] reduced the infection risk (as demonstrated
by the absence of human cases to date
in 2015), H3N2v continues to circulate
among North American swine and, as
such, has high pandemic potential.
In this issue of The Journal of Infectious Disease, Nelson and colleagues
[12] present results from the largest molecular epidemiology study of influenza A
viruses in exhibition swine to date. They
carried out large-scale comparative genomic and statistical phylogenetic analyses
to provide a detailed picture of the evolution and spread of the IAV-S in exhibition swine in the United States during
2009–2013. They showed annual introductions of IAV-S to exhibition swine
from commercial pigs. Yet, similar geno-
types circulate in exhibition swine in
neighboring states, suggesting that viral
transmission and genetic exchange among
viruses are found exclusively in exhibition
swine populations. Movement of exhibition
swine, therefore, may create opportunities
for IAV-S to transmit to naive populations
and generate novel influenza variants
through reassortment. Even though there
is evidence of direct transmission of human
IAV to exhibition swine, this occurred less
often than swine-to-human transmission.
The manners in which these H3N2v viruses have become established in exhibition
swine suggest that exhibition swine should
be considered a unique reservoir for influenza viruses with pandemic potential. This
study provides a framework to generate
testable hypotheses and insights into specific risk assessments for potentially pandemic influenza strains.
Even though the viruses in exhibition
swine are ultimately derived from those
circulating in commercial herds, the conditions at agricultural fairs, and the rearing
behaviors of exhibition swine, allow those
viruses to diversify from their common
ancestors. Control efforts, such as prepandemic vaccine stockpiling, designed to
target viruses circulating in commercial
swine might not be effective against viruses circulating in exhibitions swine. The
fact that many more people have direct
contact with exhibition swine than commercial swine means that risk mitigation
must also account for the diversity of viruses circulating among exhibition swine.
Therefore, large-scale comparative genetic
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
•
JID 2016:213 (15 January)
•
169
Swine are permissive to infections with
both avian and human influenza A viruses,
facilitating genomic reassortment among
viruses from multiple host species. As a result, swine have been identified as mixing
vessels for influenza A viruses and a source
of emergence for novel viruses, including
those with pandemic potential [1, 2].
Since July 2011, human infections with influenza A virus of swine (IAV-S) subtype
H3N2 (H3N2v to distinguish them from
seasonal H3N2 influenza A viruses) have
occurred throughout the United States
with more than 340 cases and 1 death (as
of July 2015) [3]. The main risk factor for
infection with H3N2v was identified as direct contact with swine, primarily during
agricultural fairs [4].
There are 3 major swine-human interfaces in the United States: domestic swine
(commercial swine and exhibition swine),
feral hogs (hunted for sport, food, and
animal control), and abattoirs. It is estimated that some 150 million people visit
170
•
JID 2016:213 (15 January)
•
to characterize viruses. If the influenza research community does not incorporate
large-scale comparative genetic studies
in generating their hypotheses, they risk
inappropriately generalizing their results
to all circulating viruses, even though
their observations are based on a narrow
scope of circulating variants. Focusing on
individual variants instead of systems that
generated the viruses with pandemic potential may, therefore, limit the effectiveness of pandemic mitigation plans.
Nelson et al [12] demonstrate that it is
critical to continue surveillance efforts
among exhibition swine. This reservoir
may be contributing to the diversity of
viruses that infect people. Those viruses
need to be characterized by virological
methods and placed side by side with
detailed clinical, epidemiological, and
genomic information to maximize the
potential of phylogenetic approaches, in
order to help us understand the biology
of influenza viruses in exhibition swine
and predict the next influenza pandemic.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Note
Potential conflict of interest. Both authors:
No reported conflicts. Both authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential
Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript
have been disclosed.
References
1. Scholtissek C, Bürger H, Kistner O, Shortridge KF.
The nucleoprotein as a possible major factor in
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
10.
11.
12.
determining host specificity of influenza H3N2
(...truncated)