Mitochondrial DNA sequence characteristics modulate the size of the genetic bottleneck
Human Molecular Genetics, 2016, Vol. 25, No. 5
1031–1041
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv626
Advance Access Publication Date: 5 January 2016
Association Studies Article
A S S O C I AT I O N S T U D I E S A R T I C L E
Mitochondrial DNA sequence characteristics modulate
the size of the genetic bottleneck
1
Institute of Genetic Medicine, 2Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research and 3Institute of
Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 4Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology
Unit, Cambridge, UK, 5Department of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 6Department of Clinical Genetics, Research Schools GROW/CARIM, Maastricht
University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 7Division of Molecular Neurogenetics, National Neurological
Institute ‘C. Besta’, Milano, Italy, 8IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna,
Italy, 9Unit of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna,
Bologna, Italy, 10Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, 11Department of
Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 12Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Department of
Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA and 13Department of
Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
*To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Biomedical Campus,
Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. Tel: +44 1223217091; Fax: +44 122333694; Email:
Abstract
With a combined carrier frequency of 1:200, heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations cause human disease in
∼1:5000 of the population. Rapid shifts in the level of heteroplasmy seen within a single generation contribute to the wide
range in the severity of clinical phenotypes seen in families transmitting mtDNA disease, consistent with a genetic bottleneck
during transmission. Although preliminary evidence from human pedigrees points towards a random drift process
underlying the shifting heteroplasmy, some reports describe differences in segregation pattern between different mtDNA
mutations. However, based on limited observations and with no direct comparisons, it is not clear whether these
observations simply reflect pedigree ascertainment and publication bias. To address this issue, we studied 577 mother–child
pairs transmitting the m.11778G>A, m.3460G>A, m.8344A>G, m.8993T>G/C and m.3243A>G mtDNA mutations. Our analysis
controlled for inter-assay differences, inter-laboratory variation and ascertainment bias. We found no evidence of selection
during transmission but show that different mtDNA mutations segregate at different rates in human pedigrees. m.8993T>G/C
†
I.J.W. and P.J.C. contributed equally to the study.
Received: September 2, 2015. Revised: November 26, 2015. Accepted: December 22, 2015
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
For commercial re-use, please contact
1031
Ian J. Wilson1,†, Phillipa J. Carling1,2,†, Charlotte L. Alston2,3,
Vasileios I. Floros4,5, Angela Pyle1,2, Gavin Hudson1,2, Suzanne C.E.H. Sallevelt6,
Costanza Lamperti7, Valerio Carelli8,9, Laurence A. Bindoff10,11, David C. Samuels12,
Passorn Wonnapinij13, Massimo Zeviani4,7, Robert W. Taylor2,3, Hubert J.M. Smeets6,
Rita Horvath1,2 and Patrick F Chinnery2,4,5,*
1032
| Human Molecular Genetics, 2016, Vol. 25, No. 5
segregated significantly faster than m.11778G>A, m.8344A>G and m.3243A>G, consistent with a tighter mtDNA genetic
bottleneck in m.8993T>G/C pedigrees. Our observations support the existence of different genetic bottlenecks primarily
determined by the underlying mtDNA mutation, explaining the different inheritance patterns observed in human pedigrees
transmitting pathogenic mtDNA mutations.
Introduction
Results
Determining the potential impact of ascertainment bias
Given previous concerns about ascertainment bias when studying the inheritance of heteroplasmy in human pedigrees (9),
first we performed a simulation experiment to determine the
possible consequences of identifying pedigrees through a clinically affected child. We then determined whether the standard
approach of omitting the affected proband minimizes any bias
to an acceptable level.
The simulations were based on an established model for the
mtDNA genetic bottleneck using measurements of heteroplasmy
made in human oocytes for neutral alleles (i.e. with no selection)
(12,13). We studied the difference in heteroplasmy level between
a mother and child (ΔM-O) in simulated pedigrees in silico, with
three possible strengths of the mtDNA genetic bottleneck
(where bottleneck parameter, b = 0.9, is a weak bottleneck; b = 0.7
is an intermediate strength bottleneck; and b = 0.2 is a strong
Analysis of human pedigree data
To generate the largest data set possible, we studied pedigrees
derived from a meta-analysis of published data [n = 532
mother–child pairs transmitting five common heteroplasmic
mtDNA mutations: m.11778G>A (n = 117), m.3460G>A (n = 74),
m.8344A>G (n = 96), m.8993T>G/C (n = 117) and m.3423A>G
(n = 128), citations shown in the Material and Methods]; and 45
new unpublished mother–child pairs [m.8344A>G (n = 9),
m.8993T>G/C (n = 2) and m.3243A>G (n = 34)] measured in two
centres. Given that there was no obvious difference between
the two data sets (Fig. 3), we merged all of the data and minimized
ascertainment bias by analysing separately data with and without the clinically affected probands. The final data set included
467 mother–child pairs for the uncorrected data. m.3243A>G
was analysed before and after correcting for the known decrease
in leucocyte heteroplasmy levels for this specific mutation using
the published approach (14). For this correction, only individuals
with a heteroplasmy level of <95% were included to avoid pairs
where the mother or offspring values corrected to >100%. This reduced the sample size of m.3243A>G from 137 to 99 pairs. The entire data set was used to determine the likely size of the
bottleneck parameter, b, using the model described previously
(12,13), incorporating the laboratory assay and laboratory site as
covariates. Bayesian statistical analyses were performed using
JAGS (15).
For each mutation, the average change in heteroplasmy was not
significantly different from zero, consistent with no selection for or
against the mtDNA mutations during transmission. The posterior
differences in bottleneck strength, b, are shown in Figure 4. As predicted from the simulations, the bottleneck strength was overestimated (i.e. b (...truncated)