Haemodynamic improvement of older, previously replaced mechanical mitral valves by removal of the subvalvular pannus in redo cardiac surgery
CASE REPORT – ADULT CARDIAC
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 24 (2017) 148–149
doi:10.1093/icvts/ivw276 Advance Access publication 1 September 2016
Cite this article as: Kim JH, Kim TY, Choi JB, Kuh JH. Haemodynamic improvement of older, previously replaced mechanical mitral valves by removal of the
subvalvular pannus in redo cardiac surgery. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2017;24:148–9.
Haemodynamic improvement of older, previously replaced
mechanical mitral valves by removal of the subvalvular pannus
in redo cardiac surgery
Jong Hun Kima,b, Tae Youn Kima, Jong Bum Choia,b,* and Ja Hong Kuha,b
a
b
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Chonbuk, Republic of Korea
Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University and Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju,
Chonbuk, Republic of Korea
* Corresponding author. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, 20 Geonji-Ro, Deokjin-Gu, Jeonju,
Chonbuk 561-712, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-63-2501486; e-mail: ( J.B. Choi).
Received 16 April 2016; received in revised form 13 July 2016; accepted 20 July 2016
Abstract
Patients requiring redo cardiac surgery for diseased heart valves other than mitral valves may show increased pressure gradients and
reduced valve areas of previously placed mechanical mitral valves due to subvalvular pannus formation. We treated four women who had
mechanical mitral valves inserted greater than or equal to 20 years earlier and who presented with circular pannus that protruded into the
lower margin of the valve ring but did not impede leaflet motion. Pannus removal improved the haemodynamic function of the mitral
valve.
Keywords: Mitral valve • Subvalvular stenosis • Treatment
After mechanical mitral valve replacement, other diseased heart
valves may require surgery. Marked pannus may form along the
upper and lower ring planes of previously placed mechanical mitral
valves. Although the valve leaflet motion may not be impeded, the
pannus may aggravate valve gradients and areas [1]. In redo cardiac
surgery for other diseased heart valves, pannus removal from
mechanical mitral valves may improve the valve haemodynamic
function.
subvalvular pannus inside the mitral valve ring was pushed from
the atrial to ventricular side and removed through the aortic
opening using small sinus forceps. In the patient who had tricuspid valve repair, pannus was removed through the previously
replaced bileaflet mechanical aortic valve opening. Although 2
patients had normal mitral valve gradients, the marked pannus
growth inside the mitral valve ring led to concern about possible
valve malfunction. At 3–19 months after surgery, echocardiography showed that mitral valve areas increased 0.1–0.6 cm2 with
decreased maximum and mean valve pressure gradients (Table 1).
CASE REPORTS
DISCUSSION
Four women (age, 57–67 years) who had mechanical mitral valve
replacement with posterior chordal preservation 20–29 years
earlier underwent redo cardiac surgery to treat other diseased
heart valves (Table 1). The older mitral valves worked well in all
patients without any impaired bileaflet motion.
Under moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and
cardioplegic cardiac arrest, pannus was removed from mechanical
mitral valves through aortic valve openings and left atriotomies.
Pannus evaluation was through the left atriotomy, which showed
calcified circular pannus protruding 1.0–2.0 mm into the lower
margin of the valve metal ring opening (Fig. 1) and less pannus
present on the upper plane of the ring. In 3 patients who required
aortic valve replacement, the aortic valve was removed and the
Prosthetic mechanical valve dysfunction caused by valve thrombosis or pannus formation often requires mitral valve replacement
[1, 2]. However, because mechanical valves have not substantially
changed over the past two decades, pannus removal instead of
valve replacement may be prudent to recover prosthetic mitral
valve function [3].
Subvalvular pannus protruding into the valve opening may progressively grow into the valve opening, aggravating valve haemodynamics [4] or limiting leaflet motion [2–4]. For patients requiring
redo surgery for valves other than the mitral valve, the older
mechanical mitral valves that are hindered by pannus could be
replaced. However, in patients requiring continuous anticoagulation, pannus removal alone can improve the valve haemodynamic
INTRODUCTION
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
J.H. Kim et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
149
Table 1: Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings before and after redo cardiac surgery
Patient
no.
Sex/
Previous valve replacement
Age
Mo/Year Valve
(years)
1
F/67
2/1987
2
F/64
6/1994
3
F/57
5/1991
4
F/66
1/1996
Follow-up Preop Max/Mean MVAa LAD PAP
Stroke
(mo)
or
MVGa
(cm2) (mm) (mmHg) volume
postop (mmHg)
(ml)
Redo valve surgery
Mo/Year Valve
MVR (St Jude 27 mm) 8/2014
AVR (St Jude 19 mm)
MVR (St Jude 29 mm) 1/2015
MVR (St Jude 27 mm) 8/2015
AVR (St Jude 21 mm)
MVR (Sorin 27 mm) 1/2016
Redo AVR (St Jude 19 mm) 19
AVR (St Jude 19 mm)
TAP (MC3 ring 26 mm)
TAP (MC3 ring 30 mm)
AVR (St Jude 19 mm)
TAP (MC3 30 mm)
14
8
3
Preop
Postop
Preop
Postop
Preop
Postop
Preop
Postop
23/7
16/6
15/5
8/4
17/7
16/4
10/4
7/2
3.3
3.7
2.5
2.6
2.0
2.6
2.3
2.5
60
60
37
43
51
51
58
55
55
33
25
25
36
27
44
35
43
51
45
41
40
41
55
42
AVR: aortic valve replacement; LAD: left atrial dimension; MVA: mitral valve area; MVG: mitral valve gradient; MVR: mitral valve replacement; PAP: pulmonary
artery pressure; Preop: preoperative; Postop: postoperative; TAP: tricuspid annuloplasty.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test: P = 0.068 and 0.066 for pre- and postoperative MVG and MVA, and P = 0.125 for LAD.
a
function, reducing the possibility of future mechanical valve malfunction and the morbidity and mortality associated with redo
mitral valve replacement.
Funding
Supported by funding from the Clinical Research of Chonbuk
National University and the Biomedical Research Institute of
Chonbuk National University Hospital.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
[1] Misawa Y. Valve-related complications after mechanical heart valve implantation. Surg Today 2015;45:1205–9.
[2] Akay TH, Gultekin B, Ozkan S, Aslim E, Uguz E, Sezgin A et al. Mitral valve
replacements in redo patients with previous mitral valve procedures:
mid-term results and risk factors for survival. J Card Surg 2008;23:415–21.
[3] Park B, Park PW, Park CK. Transaortic chordae and pannus removal without
redo mitral valve replacement in prosthetic mitral valve malfunction. Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:1057–8.
[4] Smadi O, Hassan I, Pibarot P, Kadem L. Numerical and experimental investigations of (...truncated)