Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Predictors and Functional Outcome In Patients With Ischemic Stroke
JHN Journal
Volume 10 | Issue 1
Article 1
Winter 2015
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Predictors and
Functional Outcome In Patients With Ischemic
Stroke
Anthony P. Kent, BA
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University,
Maria Montano, MPH
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University,
Nohra Chalouhi, MD
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience,
Badih Daou, MD
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience,
Robert H. Rosenwasser MD
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital of Neuroscience,
See next page
for and
additional
authors works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jhnj
Follow
this
additional
Let us know how access to this document benefits you
Recommended Citation
Kent, BA, Anthony P.; Montano, MPH, Maria; Chalouhi, MD, Nohra; Daou, MD, Badih; Rosenwasser MD, Robert H.; Tjoumakaris,
MD, Stavropoula l.; and Jabbour, Pascal MD (2015) "Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Predictors and Functional Outcome In
Patients With Ischemic Stroke," JHN Journal: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29046/JHNJ.010.1.001
Available at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jhnj/vol10/iss1/1
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas
Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly
publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and
interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in
JHN Journal by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please contact:
.
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Predictors and Functional Outcome In
Patients With Ischemic Stroke
Authors
Anthony P. Kent, BA; Maria Montano, MPH; Nohra Chalouhi, MD; Badih Daou, MD; Robert H.
Rosenwasser MD; Stavropoula l. Tjoumakaris, MD; and Pascal Jabbour MD
This review article is available in JHN Journal: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jhnj/vol10/iss1/1
Kent, BA et al.: Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Predictors and Functional Outcome In Patients With Ischemic Stroke
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy:
Predictors and Functional Outcome In
Patients With Ischemic Stroke
Anthony P. Kent BA1*, Maria Montano MPH1*, Nohra Chalouhi MD2,
Robert H. Rosenwasser MD2, Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris MD2, Pascal Jabbour MD2
Anthony P. Kent BA1*, Maria Montano MPH1*, Nohra Chalouhi MD2, Badih Daou MD2,
Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris MD2, Robert H. Rosenwasser MD2, Pascal Jabbour MD2
*Both authors contributed equally
1
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
2
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital
for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, USA
± 3 days. Tracheostomy was performed
in 36% and percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy (PEG) 63% of subjects. An
IVC filter was placed in 25% of subjects.
Overall, subjects were hospitalized for
22 ± 17 days. The mean MRS score at 90
days post-DH was 4 ± 1 characterized as
moderately severe disability. Mortality
(MRS = 6) at 90 days post-DH was 18%.
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND
Background
Patients presenting with large ischemic strokes may develop uncontrollable, progressive
brain edema that risks compression of brain parenchyma and cerebral herniation.1 Edema
that does not respond to medical treatment necessitates decompressive hemicraniectomy
(DH) as a life-saving procedure. The functional outcome of patients is uncertain and the
patient’s family is presented with the difficult decision of intervention with DH. While
the functional outcome of patients is not worsened by DH,2 neurological deficit is likely
as a result of initial large-territory ischemia. The correlation of specific clinical variables
preceding DH to patient outcome helps inform clinicians and families about prognosis.3
This study identifies an array of clinical variables in patients who underwent DH for ischemic stroke in order to investigate potential predictors of functional outcome.
The present analysis describes the clinical
variables and functional outcome in
patients who underwent DH subsequent
to severe cerebral edema that resulted
from ischemic stroke. The characteristic
patient was male, clinically overweight
with a history of hypertension, and
presenting with an NIHSS > 10 implicating
the right MCA. Cases involving intervention with tPA or endovascular therapy
did not preclude the need for DH. The
midline shift is serially monitored by
neuroradiology for patients with cerebral
edema. The peak value was collected,
with a mean shift of 9 mm prior to intervention with DH. Although the mean time
from stroke onset to DH was 3 days, it was
possible for DH to occur at a max of 35
days. Depending on the severity of stroke
patients required tracheostomy for ventilator assistance, and PEG tube placement
to provide a route for adequate nutrition.
The incidence of deep vein thrombosis
(DVT) and requirement for placement of
an IVC filter was not uncommon during
the in-patient recovery period, which is
likely related to venous blood stasis and
comorbidity in the setting of prolonged
immobilization. After total hospitalization
for nearly a month subjects were typically
discharged to a rehabilitation center or
nursing home. At 90 days post-DH most
patients had disability requiring assistance
(MRS 3 - 5), a minority of patients (4%)
were considered functionally independent (MRS = 2), and 18% of patients
METHOD
A total of 1,624 subjects that underwent any type of craniectomy from 2006 to 2014
were retrospectively screened via electronic medical record. The specific selection
criterion was DH secondary to ischemic stroke involving the middle cerebral artery
(MCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), or both. Subjects were excluded if they underwent
craniectomy for any reason other than DH for ischemic stroke; or if the MCA or ICA were
not implicated. The clinical variables that were collected may be divided into pre-DH
and post-DH. The pre-DH variables involve patient demographics and past medical
history, in addition to clinical variables during the period of presentation and clinical
management leading up to DH. The post-DH variables describe the in-patient recovery
period and discharge status. The primary outcome was functional status assessed by
the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score at 90 days post-DH. The MRS ranges from 0 (no
symptoms) to 6 (death) with intermediate values (1-5) representing increasing functional
and cognitive disability.
RESULTS
There were N = 95 subjects who presented with ischemic stroke involving the MCA
(72%), ICA (7%), or both MCA+ICA (...truncated)