Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey of Patent Litigators

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Sep 2024

Mr. Quinn provides an empirical overview of patent litigation, after which, he notes that the true growth in patent litigation has not occurred in the courtroom trial of disputes, but in the pretrial process. He concludes that increasing reliance on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation, is responsible for both the dramatic number of cases terminating during the pretrial process and the constant number of patent trials. The author reports the results of a survey taken of over one hundred patent litigators. The focus of the survey was to determine the attitude of patent litigators toward mediation or arbitration and their preparation methods of the damages component of a case.

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=iplr

Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey of Patent Litigators

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 3 Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey of Patent Litigators Eugene R. Quinn, Jr. UCO & Associates; Franklin Pierce Law Center Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr Part of the Intellectual Property Commons Repository Citation Eugene R. Quinn, Jr., Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey of Patent Litigators , 3 Intellectual Property L. Rev. 77 (1999). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol3/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact . HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 77 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 78 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 79 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 80 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 81 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 82 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 83 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 84 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 85 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 86 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 87 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 88 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 89 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 90 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 91 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 92 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 93 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 94 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 95 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 96 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 97 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 98 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 99 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 100 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 101 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 102 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 103 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 104 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 105 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 106 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 107 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 108 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 109 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 110 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 111 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 112 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 113 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 114 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 115 1999 HeinOnline -- 3 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 116 1999 (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=iplr
Article home page: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol3/iss1/3

Eugene R. Jr. Quinn. Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey of Patent Litigators, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 1999, Volume 3, Issue 1,