Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified Community
BYU Studies Quarterly
Volume 44 | Issue 1
Article 4
1-1-2005
Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified
Community
J. Spencer Fluhman
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq
Recommended Citation
Fluhman, J. Spencer (2005) "Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified Community," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 44 : Iss. 1 ,
Article 4.
Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol44/iss1/4
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies
Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact ,
.
Fluhman: Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified Community
Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of
Sanctified Community
/. Spencer
Fluhman
P
olly Knight's health was failing as she and her family trudged toward
western Missouri. Having accepted Joseph Smith Jr. as God's prophet
on earth, the Knights left their Colesville, New York, farm and joined with
other Mormon converts at Kirtland, Ohio, in 1831. Finding a brief respite
there, they again set out, this time for the city of "Zion" that Joseph Smith
said they would help build in Jackson County, Missouri. Worried that
Polly was too ill to complete the trek, her family considered stopping in
hopes she might recover. But "she would not consent to stop traveling,"
recalled her son Newell: "Her only, or her greatest desire was to set her feet
upon the land of Zion, and to have her body interred in that land." Fearing
the worst, Newell bought lumber for a coffin in case she expired en route.
"But the Lord gave her the desire of her heart, and she lived to stand upon
that land."1
Latter-day Saints, though, were not the only Christian sect in the early
nation to treasure the notion of a fellowship with other believers in a life
apart from the world. A generation earlier, converts had come together to
live as one in the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing.
New converts, calling themselves Believers but commonly known as Shakers, gathered into communities in Massachusetts, New York, and other parts
of New England. As this society expanded, Shaker leaders and converts
traveled from established communities in New England to newly formed
frontier communities in Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana. Despite poverty,
persecution, and the difficulties of frontier settlement, many reacted as
did David Rowley, a Vermont cabinetmaker who converted to Shakerism
in 1810, who wrote "that I never have seen one movement since I set out
in this blessed way but that I felt thankful for it; & can with confidence
BYU Studies 44, no. 1 (2005)
Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 2005
79
1
BYU Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, Iss. 1 [2005], Art. 4
80
'---' BYU Studies
recommend it to all souls who are sick of the vain world & are seeking . . .
a way of true life & imperishable love."2
Such was the attachment of many Latter-day Saints and Shakers to the
idea of living in a holy community. Throughout the nineteenth century,
conversion to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or to the
United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing was virtually
synonymous with "gathering." Indeed, the search for a workable holy
community serves as a unifying theme for the early history of both these
movements. Historians have long noted similarities between the two
J. Spencer Fluhman
My interest in Shaker communities stems
from my stint as a research fellow in the
"Archive of Restoration Culture" project
sponsored by the Joseph Fielding Smith
Institute for Latter-day Saint History at
Brigham Young University. Under the
direction of Richard L. Bushman (Gouverneur Morris Professor of History
Emeritus, Columbia University), we fellows spent the summer of 1999 placing
prominent LDS concepts in their earlyAmerican cultural context.
I was struck then, and now, by "gathering" as practiced by the early Saints and
sought possible analogues in early American religious history. The Shakers were an obvious choice for comparison. Not only had earlier scholars
noted similarities between the two movements but, as I sifted through
early Shaker documents, I began to comprehend intersections not only
between the groups' communitarian impulses but in their prophetism,
patterns of spirituality, and apocalyptic dispensationalism.
My interest in comparing Shaker and Mormon theology continued into
my graduate studies in history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
and resulted in this extended analysis. I find that my D&C students here
at BYU enjoy comparing the early Shaker and Mormon communities and
reading the groups' lively descriptions of each other.
—J. Spencer Fluhman, Brigham Young University
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol44/iss1/4
2
Fluhman: Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified Community
Early Mormon and Shaker Visions of Sanctified Community <—•
81
groups; Stephen Marini has gone so far to say that the Latter-day Saints
were among the Shakers' "direct successors."3
Similarities notwithstanding, some nonhistorians might fail to associate the two movements, given the demographic trajectories each has
followed since its respective founding. Mormonism experienced dynamic
growth throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, n artl v the
result of a vigorous proselytizing program and high birth rate. Over half
of the Church's members today live outside the United States, establishing Mormonism as a world religion. Shakers, too, experienced periods of
explosive growth in their early history, but seasons of intense proselytizing
were interspersed with spans of official suspension of evangelism. Moreover, the Shakers' celibate life ensured a modest growth rate. Shakerism
attracted adherents after the U.S. Civil War, but the number of followers
has steadily dwindled since the mid-nineteenth century. A small handful
of Believers now tend the remaining Shaker village in Sabbathday Lake,
Maine.4 Historians are thus more likely to call attention to the longevity of
the Shaker experience than its size. Indeed, more than two hundred years
of Shaker communal life have earned the sect the renown of being history's
most successful communal society.5
These dissimilar histories notwithstanding, early Shakers and Mormons offered similar responses to the rapid transformations of the early
American republic. Christians had long been accustomed to the notion of
coming "out of the world" (1 Cor. 5:10), but most did not see that ideal in
literal terms as did early Mormons and Shakers. Most of their Christian
contemporaries no doubt felt that they, too, had been "chosen" out of the
world (John 15:19), but they probably would have insisted that their faith
or piety was enough to separate them from the profane and ungodly; they
could live and work among the unregenerate without being "of the world."
Mormons and Shakers, however, shared a conception of their c (...truncated)