Once Upon the Bench: Rule Under the Fairy Tale

Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities Volume 13 | Issue 2 Article 5 January 2001 Once Upon the Bench: Rule Under the Fairy Tale Katherine J. Roberts Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh Part of the History Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Katherine J. Roberts, Once Upon the Bench: Rule Under the Fairy Tale, 13 Yale J.L. & Human. (2001). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol13/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities by an authorized editor of Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact . Roberts: Once Upon the Bench Note Once Upon the Bench: Rule Under the Fairy Tale Katherine J. Roberts* Deeper meaning resides in the fairy tales told to me in childhood than in the truth that is taught by life. -Schiller, The Piccolomini, III, 4. And Snow-White was kind and went with him, and their wedding was held with pomp andgreat splendor. But Snow- White's wicked stepmother was also bidden to the feast.... And when she saw her she knew her for Snow- White, and could not stir from the placefor anger and terror.For they had ready red-hot iron shoes, in which she had to dance until she fell down dead. - Brothers Grimm, Snow White The idea that the fairy tale is worthy of study by legal scholars may seem uncomfortable to many. Even the strongest supporters of the law and * Yale Law School, J.D., 2001. Special thanks to Kenji Yoshino, Hillel Levin, Melissa Ganz, Shannon Selden, and Cliff Rosky. 497 Published by Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, 2001 1 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, Vol. 13, Iss. 2 [2001], Art. 5 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [Vol. 13:497 literature movement may be given pause by this contention. It may be one thing for Kafka to give lessons in law, but the Brothers Grimm? After all, it was not until relatively recently that the fairy tale was even accepted as a legitimate subject of study by literature departments, and it is still disdained by many in the university.1 How could the childish world of fantasy stories have anything to do with the sophisticated study of law? This Note seeks to answer this question by investigating the unexplored relationship between the fairy-tale genre and law. The work of law and literature scholarship typically falls within two broad categories: law "in" literature, the study of representations of law and lawyers in literary texts, and law "as" literature, the study of legal texts using literary theory and criticism.2 This Note falls into the first category because it examines law "in" the fairy tale. However, this Note also follows others who have sought to expand the direction of law and literature scholarship by considering the ways in which literature, like law, has a coercive, or disciplinary function.3 In addition to reflecting on the theme of law in the fairy tale, this requires an examination of the narrative rules of the fairy-tale genre. In much the same way that a sonnet must follow a certain structure of rhyme and meter, the fairy-tale genre has a set of narrative particularities that constrain, or shape, expression. Such conventions are of special interest in the case of the coercion of the fairy tale, for as we will see, it has a distinctively legal structure. It is my argument that certain rules must be obeyed within the fairy tale, the law in the fairy tale, and without, the law of the fairy tale. In short, the genre demands that good characters are duly rewarded and evil ones justly punished, thus guiding a young audience's conception of justice. Stories that subvert this thematic core have been banished from the genre. This is a highly coercive process, which allows us to draw further links between the genre and our legal system. Moreover, in examining the narrative conventions of the fairy tale, striking similarities between this culture of literature and the story-telling of case law are uncovered. Given that the readership of the fairy tale far exceeds that of any legal treatise, and that the fairy tale typically addresses itself to younger minds, one might say that the fairy tale plays a greater role in shaping lawful behavior than the recorded law. Any such inquiry into literature's coercive function, let alone its 1. Maria Tatar, Introduction to THE CLASSIC FAIRY TALES at xi (Maria Tatar ed., 1999); JACK ZIPES, HAPPILY EVER AFTER 8 (1997). 2. Paul Gerwirtz, Introduction to LAW'S STORIES: NARRATIVE AND RHETORIC IN THE LAW 2, 3-4 (Peter Brooks & Paul Gerwirtz eds., 1996); IAN WARD, LAW AND LITERATURE: POSSIBILITIES AND PERSPECTIVES 3 (1995). 3. E.g., JOHN BENDER, IMAGINING THE PENITENTIARY: FICTION AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE MIND IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND (1987); D.A. MILLER, THE NOVEL AND THE POLICE (1988); Richard Brodhead, Sparing the Rod: Discipline and Fiction in Antebellum America, 21 REPRESENTATIONS 67 (1988). https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol13/iss2/5 2 Roberts: Once Upon the Bench 2001] Roberts 499 disciplinary superiority, should begin by addressing Robert Cover's keen articulation of the distinction between literature and law, namely, that "legal interpretive acts signal and occasion the imposition of violence upon others."4 Though Cover acknowledges the persuasive and narrative dimensions of law, in his view, law's violence-a violence that can be seen and felt in the flesh-frees law from the need to rely on persuasive narratives in order to coerce its subjects. 5 To the extent that law does rely on narrative, it does so to provide itself with meaning, and hence, to legitimate its violence. That is, because legal narratives make their mark upon the body, they must be self-justifying in addition to being hermeneutically sound.6 They must consistently persuade readers-and, more importantly, implementers of the ensuing violence-that the law's violence is legitimate, whereas extralegal violence is not. In contrast, literature need not, and typically does not, attempt to persuade us to accept certain violent acts as legitimate, let alone commit such acts. This Note seeks to introduce the genre of the fairy tale as an intriguing, albeit limited, exception to this rule. While it is true that the fairy tale has neither the strong arm of the law behind it nor the necessity of persuading us to commit specific acts of violence, the genre nonetheless consistently seeks to uphold legal distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate acts of violence. In short, the fairy tale seeks to raise us as obedient social and legal subjects. It is the mission of this Note, then, to call into question even this most plausible distinction between law and literature. I have divided my Note into four parts. In Part I, I confront the resistance to the analogy between fairy tales and the law more thoro (...truncated)