In Defense of Ethics: New Considerations After the Packard Commission
The Catholic Lawyer
Volume 34, 1991, Number 2
Article 4
In Defense of Ethics: New Considerations After the
Packard Commission
Paul E. Fiorelli
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl
Part of the Catholic Studies Commons
Recommended Citation
Paul E. Fiorelli (2017) "In Defense of Ethics: New Considerations After the Packard Commission," The Catholic Lawyer: Vol. 34 : No. 2
, Article 4.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl/vol34/iss2/4
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The
Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact .
IN DEFENSE OF
ETHICS: NEW
CONSIDERATIONS
AFTER THE PACKARD
COMMISSION
PAUL E. FIORELLI*
INTRODUCTION
The war in the Persian Gulf has reemphasized the importance of
United States military preparedness, even in times of peace. During wartime, it may be easier for military contractors to justify the costs of researching and developing newer, more exotic, "smarter" weapons systems.
Now that the current crisis has passed in its technical sense, many in
Congress may "shift gears" and attempt to reallocate expenditures from a
war-driven economy to one associated with a time of peace. Even the euphoria of victory in the Iraqi-Kuwaiti theatre and feelings of "patriotism"
identified therewith will probably not protect the defense industry from
increased public scrutiny. Budget cuts required by Gramm-Rudman will
place an even greater pressure on defense contractors to compete for increasingly scarce government funds. The pressure to survive may increase
the temptation to engage in fraudulent procurement practices, not unknown in this area. Whether contractors succumb to this temptation depends upon a number of factors, including individual corporate resolve,
commitment to ethics, and government review.'
The purpose of this Article is to present an overview of the ethics
Copyright 1991, Paul E. Fiorelli, J.D., M.B.A., Associate Professor of Accounting and
Law, Xavier University.
Apart from the current situation in the Middle East, one by-product of the decrease in
political tension between East and West should be a corresponding decrease in military
expenditures. The circumstances seemed clearer prior to Iraq's invasion of neighboring Kuwait and the current unrest in the Soviet Union. Regardless of problems in the rest of the
world, it will become increasingly difficult to justify military growth in light of the current
emphasis on reducing the deficit.
*
34 CATHOLIC LAWYER, No. 2
process in the defense industry, and suggest appropriate self-policing policies to maximize the probability of compliance. Although current remedies are in need of improvement, the government and private citizens will
not hesitate to use the available sanctions, including but not necessarily
limited to: (1) fines; (2) imprisonment; (3) suspension; (4) debarment; and
(5) qui tam actions.2
I.
PACKARD COMMISSION
In 1985, President Reagan formed the Blue Ribbon Commission on
Defense Management ("Packard Commission") to address a fundamental
breakdown of the entire military procurement process. 3 This was partially
in response to sensationalized spare parts aberrations. Even prior to the
current thaw in the "Cold War," it was difficult for Congress to support
military spending increases with the press reporting airborne toilet seat
covers costing the taxpayer $1,900 apiece."
Summarizing, the Packard Commission found legitimate cause for
dissatisfaction with the process by which the Department of Defense
("DoD") and Congress purchase military equipment and material. The
Commission strongly disagreed, however, with the commonly held views
of what is wrong in the procurement process and the approach to be used
in fixing it. The nation's defense programs, so said the Commission, lose
far more to inefficient procedures than to fraud and dishonesty. The truly
deleterious impediments were found to be overcomplicated organization
and rigid procedure, not avarice or connivance among the members of the
defense industry.5
The Packard Commission's Interim Report of February 1986 called
There is a wealth of material addressing problems associated with government contracting, and fraud in particular. See generally Barletta & Pollack, Civil Litigation of Allegations of Fraud in Connection with Government Contract Claims, 18 PUB. CONT. L.J. 235
(1988); Blum & Lobaco, Following the Money, 7 CAL. LAW. 36 (1987); Coburn & Sinchak,
Federal Procurement in the Federal Courts 1987-88: A Selective Review, 19 Pua. CONT. L.J.
14 (1989); Fennell, Government Contract Fraud, 25 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 427 (1988); Overly,
Government Contractors,Beware: Civil and Criminal Penalties Abound for Defective Pricing, 20 Loy. L.A. L. REV. 597 (1987); Pitt, Minimizing Corporate Civil and Criminal Liability: A Second Look at Corporate Codes of Coduct, 697 PRAC. L. INST. 319 (1990). For a fine
analysis of the impact of recent federal legislation in this area, see Donaldson, Section Six
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act Amendments of 1988: A New Ethical Standard in Government Contracting?,20 CUMB. L. REV. 421 (1990).
' See Mayer, Military Procurement: Basic Principles and Recent Developments, 21 GEO.
WASH. J. INT'L L. & ECON. 165 (1987) (events leading to formation of Packard Commission).
' See Cincinnati Enquirer, July 26, 1990, at A8, col. 1. Even though the public and the press
focused on spare parts abuses, the Packard Commission felt that this was not a fundamental
cause of the problem.
5 AN INTERIM REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT, BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION ON DEFENSE MANAGEMENT (PACKARD COMMISSION) 15 (1966).
ETHICS IN DEFENSE INDUSTRY
for defense contractors to perform more self-policing, and increase their
efforts in the area of business ethics. The Commission stated bluntly: "To
assure that their houses are in order defense contractors must promulgate
and vigilantly enforce codes of ethics that address the unique problems
and procedures incident to defense procurement. They must also develop
and implement internal controls to monitor these codes of ethics and sensitive aspects of contract compliance." 6 Prior to the Commission's 1986
Final Report, thirty-three defense contractors became signatories of what
is now known as the "Defense Industry Initiative" ("DII"). The DII was
divided into two parts. The first called for contractors to adopt codes of
ethics, train employees in the area of business ethics, and provide
"whistleblower" reporting mechanisms (i.e., hotlines and/or ombudsmen).
The second part called for increased public accountability. Signatories
were to complete a questionnaire intended to measure their implementation of the ethical principles. These questionnaires would then be audited
by an outside, independent agency and the results made public. They also
agre (...truncated)