This House which I have built: The Foundation of the Brattle Street Church in Boston and Transformations in Colonial Congregationalism
Volume 10
Article 4
2011
This House which I have built: The Foundation of
the Brattle Street Church in Boston and
Transformations in Colonial Congregationalism
Cara Elliott
Gettysburg College
Class of 2011
Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj
Part of the American Studies Commons, History Commons, and the Religion Commons
Share feedback about the accessibility of this item.
Elliott, Cara (2011) "This House which I have built: The Foundation of the Brattle Street Church in Boston and Transformations in
Colonial Congregationalism," The Gettysburg Historical Journal: Vol. 10 , Article 4.
Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol10/iss1/4
This open access article is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an
authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact .
This House which I have built: The Foundation of the Brattle Street
Church in Boston and Transformations in Colonial Congregationalism
Abstract
On December 24, 1699, a small gathering of men and women met "for public Worship in [their] pleasant newbuilt house," a simple wooden structure in Brattle Close, a section of Boston near the town dock. The newly
appointed Reverend Benjamin Colman preached from Chronicles 2, chapter vi, verse 18, "But will God in
very deed dwell with men on the earth? Behold, heaven, and the heaven of heavens, cannot contain thee; how
much less this house which I have built." This first public meeting of the Brattle Street Church occurred amidst
a heated theological debate among New England Congregational clergymen, which began a year earlier when
the foundation of the church had first been conceived. Brattle Street‘s foundation was in reaction to
theological, political, and cultural transformations that affected the whole of New England in the latter half of
the seventeenth century, all of which converged in the 1690s. While the foundation of Brattle Street Church
did not make any radical departures from contemporary theological consensus, its foundation did represent
the first concrete fragmentation of a theretofore unified New England Congregational community. In this
sense, the foundation of the Brattle Street Church is representative of a radical development in the evolution
of colonial Congregationalism.
Keywords
Boston, Brattle Street Church, colonial congregationalism
This article is available in The Gettysburg Historical Journal: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol10/iss1/4
This House which I have built: The
Foundation of the Brattle Street Church in
Boston and Transformations in Colonial
Congregationalism
Cara Elliott
―Their high object was to found a new Christian
Congregational church, upon the broad, catholic,
but conservative principles of Congregationalism –
a church in which a just liberty and privilege should
be allowed to all, and nothing imposed on any
individual.‖ 1
On December 24, 1699, a small gathering of
men and women met ―for public Worship in [their]
pleasant new-built house,‖ a simple wooden
structure in Brattle Close, a section of Boston near
the town dock.2 The newly appointed Reverend
1
Samuel Kirkland Lothrop, ―Sermon One, December
30, 1849,‖ A History of the Church in Brattle Street, Boston
(Boston: WM. Crosby and H.P. Nichols, 1851), 16.
2
Benjamin Colman, ―Records of the Church in
Brattle Square: Dr. Colman‘s Ministry, Lord‘s day, Decem.
24,‖ in The Manifesto Church: Records of the Church in
Brattle Square, Boston: With Lists of Communicants,
Baptisms, Marriages, and Funerals, 1699-1872, eds. Ellis
Loring Motte, Henry Fitch Jenks, and John Homans II
(Boston: The Benevolent Fraternity of Churches, 1902), 5;
72
Benjamin Colman preached from Chronicles 2,
chapter vi, verse 18, ―But will God in very deed
dwell with men on the earth? Behold, heaven, and
the heaven of heavens, cannot contain thee; how
much less this house which I have built.‖3 This first
public meeting of the Brattle Street Church
occurred amidst a heated theological debate among
New England Congregational clergymen, which
began a year earlier when the foundation of the
church had first been conceived. Brattle Street‘s
foundation was in reaction to theological, political,
and cultural transformations that affected the whole
of New England in the latter half of the seventeenth
Samuel Adams Drake, Old Landmarks and Historic
Personages of Boston (Boston: James R. Osgood and
Company, 1873), 122; Thomas Brattle, Benjamin Davis, John
Mico, Thomas Cooper, and John Colman to Benjamin
Colman, May 10, 1699, in Samuel Kirkland Lothrop, A
History of the Church in Brattle Street, Boston (Boston: WM.
Crosby and H.P. Nichols, 1851), 45.
3
Colman, ―Lord‘s day, Decem. 24,‖ in Records of
the Church in Brattle Square, 5.
73
century, all of which converged in the 1690s. While
the foundation of Brattle Street Church did not
make any radical departures from contemporary
theological consensus, its foundation did represent
the first concrete fragmentation of a theretofore
unified New England Congregational community.4
In this sense, the foundation of the Brattle Street
Church is representative of a radical development in
the evolution of colonial Congregationalism.
Brattle Street Church‘s foundation was not a
random occurrence. There were a number of
developments that caused its founders to establish a
4
Rick Kennedy, ―Thomas Brattle, MathematicianArchitect in the Transition of the New England Mind, 16901700,‖ Winterthur Portfolio 24, no. 4 (Winter 1989): 237 and
241 suggests that the ―liberalism‖ of the Brattle Street
founders, namely the mathematician-merchant Thomas
Brattle, has been exaggerated by the historical community.
This assertion is correct when viewing the founders from a
strictly theological or philosophical perspective. However, it
oversimplifies the contemporary contextualization of the
church‘s foundation.
74
new congregation, beginning with the
Congregational Synod of 1662 and the adoption of
the ―Half-Way‖ covenant. The decision was made
in hopes of reversing flagging church membership
and loss of piety characteristic of the 1650s, in
which the church saw the Congregational Way –
John Winthrop‘s original ―City upon a Hill‖ churchstate observing the sovereign law of Sola Scriptura,
or scripture alone, – slipping through their fingers.5
As Patricia Bonomi notes, the clergy ―ever wary of
complacency, were prepared to reform church
practices . . . in ways that would command the
continuing allegiance of New Englanders to the
5
John Winthrop, ―A Modell of Christian Charity,‖ in
Francis J. Bremer, John Winthrop: America’s Forgotten
Founding Father (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003),
179; Harry S. Stout, The New England Soul: Preaching and
Religious Culture in Colonial New England (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1986), 59.
75
Congregational Way.‖6 First suggested by Richard
Mather, a prominent Puritan clergyman at this time,
the covenant ex (...truncated)