The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection or Deferral of the Problem?

Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 7 | Issue 1 Article 6 March 1999 The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection or Deferral of the Problem? Timothy Fallaw Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Timothy Fallaw, The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection or Deferral of the Problem?, 7 J. Intell. Prop. L. 161 (1999). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol7/iss1/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact . Fallaw: The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection or Deferral of THE INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT: NECESSARY PROTECTION OR DEFERRAL OF THE PROBLEM? I. INTRODUCTION One of the last legislative efforts of the 105th Congress was the passage of the Internet Tax Freedom Act,' which was signed into law by President Clinton on October 21, 1998. This legislation was the culmination of two years of bipartisan effort, led by the co-sponsors of the Act, Rep. Christopher Cox (R-CA) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR). The Act reflects a national policy decision to keep the Internet unfettered by state and local taxation during the critical early formation period.2 This policy will be achieved by the imposition of a three year moratorium on state and local taxes of the Internet, the Act's major provision.' The ultimate objective of this "time-out" on Internet taxation is to develop an efficient and fair long-term tax policy; that is, a system which will accommodate the state and local needs for revenue without placing an undue burden on the development of the Internet as a major channel of international commerce. 4 This Note will begin with a brief discussion of the rapid development of the Internet as a commercial medium and the unique policy questions presented. The discussion will then move to the major provisions of the Internet Tax Freedom Act itself. Finally, there will be an analysis of the state and local interest objections to and predicted effects of the legislation. 'Internet Tax Freedom Act, Pub. L. No. 105-277, SS 1100 et seq., 112 Stat. 2681, 2681-719 (1998). 2 Senator Wyden's Outlineof 'CybertaxProblems'atFinanceHearing on Internet Taxation, STATE TAX NOTES, July 21, 1998, available in WL 98 STN 139-41. Internet Tax Freedom Act S 1101(a). See, e.g., CongressionalNews Releases: Cox Release on Internet Tax Freedom Act, TAX NOTES TODAY, Oct. 16,1998, availablein WL 98 TNT 200-27 (announcing presidential approval of Internet Tax Freedom Act). Published by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law, 1999 1 Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 7, Iss. 1 [1999], Art. 6 J. INTELL. PROP.L. [Vol. 7:161 II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNET AS A CHANNEL OF COMMERCE Since its functional inception as a means of sharing limited computer resources and information for portions of the scientific community, the Internet has experienced a boom in commercial activity, especially during the last four years.' In 1998, the number of host computers servicing the Internet had grown from the incipient four computers to almost thirty million located in 240 countries and territories. 6 An estimated 66 million Internet users were located in the United States alone in 1998.' Currently, 1.5 million new web pages are being created every day.' The commercial statistics related to this growth are staggering. Estimates have placed aggregate electronic commerce at $200 million for 1996, 9 $8 billion for 1997,10 and electronic commerce is expected to grow to greater than $300 billion by the year 2002.11 In 1997, online traders executed approximately $120 billion in securities transactions. 12 The Dell Computer Corporation has reported the sale of as much as $6 million of computer equipment in a single day from its web page, and there is no indication that these numbers will slow." The figures clearly indicate that the Internet has established itself as a viable commercial storefront with unlimited growth potential. One commentary answers the question of "Who's Using the Internet?" quite simply: "Everyone." 4 Consumers are using the Internet both to order tangible items of personal property which are then delivered by mail, and for electronic items which are ordered and delivered over the modem connection. Many traditional businesses (housed in "brick-and-mortar" storefronts) use the Internet as a means of providing information, which ' Michael A. Geist, The Reality of Bytes: RegulatingEconomic Activity in the Age of the Internet, 73 WASH. L. REv. 521, 522 (1998). 6 Id. 7Id. ' Thomas W. Bonnett, Is the New Global Economy Leaving State and Local Tax Structures Behind?, STATE TAX NOTES, July 13, 1998, availablein WL 98 STN 133-10. 9 Id. 10Ashcrofi Release on Internet Tax Bill's Passage in Senate, TAX NOTES TODAY, Oct. 13, 1998, availablein WL 98 TNT 197-73. n Id. 12 Geist, supra note 5, at 522. 13IdL 1 David Cowling & Andrew M. Ferris, Internet Taxation Reviewed, STATE TAX NOTES, July 23, 1997, available in WL 97 STN 141-53. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol7/iss1/6 2 Fallaw: The Internet Tax Freedom Act: Necessary Protection or Deferral of 1999] INTERNET TAX FREEDOMA CT consumers use to educate themselves regarding their prospective purchases. Modern electronic businesses are using the system to conduct "electronic commerce"'" by using the computer interface as their primary storefront. In order to access these electronic markets, consumers must procure online access through an Internet Service Provider (ISP). Once online, consumers may access online catalogs, which display a limitless range of goods for sale. These goods can be ordered online and delivered by the same conventional means as would be used by a mail-order catalog. Other goods, such as computer software, may be transferred electronically, eliminating the need for any form of ground delivery. Consumers may also access online research database information, or obtain professional services such as securities brokerage, legal, and medical consultation. The Internet also serves as a blossoming medium of communication; with such features as electronic mail (e-mail) and videoconferencing, many predict (or fear) that the Internet could even replace more conventional modes of communication such as the telephone. 6 Due to the Internet's ability to provide the functions of advertising, marketing, order placement, and delivery of electronic goods all at one time, it is possible that it could become the principal means for consumers to obtain such items as television programs, movies, music, software, and news." This potential for large increases in Internet sales revenues, and thus t (...truncated)