European Beads from Spanish-Colonial Lamanai and Tipu, Belize
BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers
Volume 6 Volume 6 (1994)
Article 5
1-1-1994
European Beads from Spanish-Colonial Lamanai and Tipu, Belize
Marvin T. Smith
Elizabeth Graham
David M. Pendergast
Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/beads
Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology
Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology
Commons
Repository Citation
Smith, Marvin T.; Graham, Elizabeth; and Pendergast, David M. (1994). "European Beads from SpanishColonial Lamanai and Tipu, Belize." BEADS: Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers 6: 21-47. Available
at: https://surface.syr.edu/beads/vol6/iss1/5
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in BEADS:
Journal of the Society of Bead Researchers by an authorized editor of SURFACE. For more information, please
contact .
EUROPEAN BEADS FROM SPANISH~COLONIAL LAMANAI AND
TIPU, BELIZE
Marvin T. Smith, Elizabeth Graham and David M. Pendergast
Excavation of the contact-period components of the Maya
sites of Lamanai and Tipu in northern and west-central
Belize, respectively, have yielded moderate collections of
European glass and other beads. The archaeological data
are augmented by ethnohistorical documentation regarding
the length of Maya/Spanish interaction. Contexts do not
provide unequivocal stratigraphic evidence of sequential
bead importation, but known dates of bead varieties assist
in refining both site chronology and the understanding of
bead use. As the first Central American collections. to be
analyzed, the two assemblages offer an initial glimpse of one
aspect of European impact on native material and non-material culture.
INTRODUCTION
Excavation of the Spanish Colonial portions of
Lamanai, in north central Belize, and Tipu, near the
country's western border (Fig. 1), has provided the
first archaeological documentation of 16th- and
17th-century Maya life in the southern lowlands. The
work at Lamanai, begun in 1975 and completed in
1986 (Pendergast 1981, 1986a-b, 1990, 1991),
comprised full excavation of every identifiable
residential structure of the colonial settlement, as well
as the two sequent Spanish churches and several
non-structure-associated refuse dumps of the period.
One of the two contact-period cemeteries was
completely excavated, whereas the second (and
probably later of the two) saw only the most minimal
sampling (Pendergast 1986b:4). In contrast, the Tipu
project has, since its initiation in 1980, involved
excavation of the single identifiable church and its
more than 600 associated burials (Cohen, Bennett and
Armstrong 1989), as well as investigation of eight
colonial residences (Graham 1991; Graham and
BEADS 6:21-47 (1994)
Bennett 1989; Graham, Jones and Kautz 1985).
Insofar as the church and Spanish-period cemetery are
concerned, the sample of the colonial remains at the
site is largely complete; only a portion of the
sanctuary was left unexcavated. Of what we estimate
to be the ·colonial community, less than one-third has
been excavated.
Despite the differences in sample size and
character at the two sites, there is a strong suggestion
that colonial-period material culture contrasts
between Lamanai and Tipu are more than an artifact
of excavation. The contrasts .are, in fact, very likely to
reflect significantly different relations between Maya
and Spaniard in communities that played largely
separate roles on the early colonial stage (see Graham,
Pendergast and Jones 1989). Although the
archaeological record from the two communities
includes parallels in some areas of European material
culture, the contexts and types of glass beads at the
two sites overlap only partially. The differences in
extent of excavation ·o f the sites may have some degree
of bearing on this aspect of sample comparability
(Pendergast 1991:350), but there is very good reason
to suppose that imported beads were utilized at
Lamanai in ways different from those that
characterized Tipu.
In addition to their value as sources of information
regarding native status arid European economic
impact in the two communities, the Lamanai and Tipu
bead collections are the first from Central America to
be analyzed. They are, therefore, useful as evidence of
the bead varieties that figured in early contact in the
area. The grave-lot associations at Tipu also bear on
bead chronology, and some suggestions regarding
chronology are made in this paper. It is important to
note, however, that the details of burial sequence
22
BELIZE
•Modern Settlements
10
0
5
ml1Un: 1 1'11'11'1
10 5
0
10
I
10
20
I
20
I
30
Figure 1. Map of Belize showing the location of Lamanai and Tipu, as well as other
archaeological sites (drawing by D. Findlay).
23
Figure 2. Structure Nl 1-18 at Lamanai, the source of most of the site's beads and probable home of the
community's alcalde (photo by D. Pendergast).
derive from a wide range of data and cannot be worked
out in full until all analyses are completed.
Full discussion of the Tipu and Lamanai
assemblages will appear in excavation reporting, but
we present here a summary of the contexts in which
the two bead collections were encountered. Most of
the beads are glass, but some jet and amber are also
included. The bead descriptions, the type and variety
designations and the dating based on typology are the
work of Smith; the discussions of the archaeological
contexts, associated artifacts and the probable
significance of the two collections were written by
Graham (Tipu) and Pendergast (Lamanai).
THELAMANAIBEADSAMPLE:CONTEXTS
With a small number of exceptions, the
16th-century Lamanai glass beads come from a
restricted but, nonetheless, complex context: a
residence designated Structure Nl 1-18 (Fig. 2)
(Pendergast 1991 :348-350, Fig. 16-4). Together with
a variety of other European goods, the beads serve to
identify with virtual certainty the principal Spanish
colonial-period Maya residence, presumably the home
of the settlement's alcalde (mayor) (Pendergast and
Graham 1993). One of the two principal lots of beads
(18 specimens; see Table 1), was recovered from a
large midden that abutted the north face of the
structure. The second lot consists of 20 beads, 14 of
which were scattered over the interior of the house, a
context that yielded a broad range of other European
goods (Pendergast and Graham 1993:345-351), with
the remaining six distributed on exterior floor
surfaces at the front of the structure. The beads'
presence immediately atop floor ballast and other
building surfaces leaves no doubt that they were
strewn throughout the structure as part of a deposition
of wealth/status items that must, given the context,
have been among the last acts that preceded
abandonment of the residence. The meaning of the
effort cannot be fully reconstructed, but it is highly
likely that the discarding of previously va (...truncated)