Binge drinking at University: a social network study in Belgium
Health Promotion International, Vol. 30 No. 3
doi:10.1093/heapro/dau007
Advance Access published 12 March, 2014
# The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email:
Binge drinking at University: a social network study
in Belgium
VINCENT LORANT* and PABLO NICAISE
Institute of Health and Society, UCLouvain, Clos Chapelle aux Champs 30 /B1.30.15.05,
Brussels 1200, Belgium
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
SUMMARY
Many university students engage in risky alcohol consumption behaviour during their stay at university. So far,
however, most studies have relied on cross-sectional surveys
and paid little attention to the role of social ties. University
students, however, are socially connected, so it is likely that
their alcohol consumption behaviour is also connected.
We hypothesized that university students’ social positions
within their networks are related to their drinking behaviour.
We carried out a social network analysis within a whole
network approach with undergraduates in two faculties (n ¼
487), those of Engineering and Psychology, in a Belgian
university. All students filled out a questionnaire recording
their drinking behaviour and their social ties (friendship,
working with, partying with and room-mate). For each
individual, indicators of centrality, social capital, and crossgender relationships were computed. We found that being
socially close to binge drinkers was associated with a higher
frequency of binge drinking. The risk of binge drinking
increased with centrality but decreased with social capital.
Having cross-gender relationships decreased the risk of
binge drinking. We found indications that the effect of centrality and gender on binge drinking depends on the composition of the network. We conclude that social position
has important effects on risky drinking behaviour and that
the composition of the network may affect these factors.
Those developing health promotion strategies could investigate the benefits of targeting central individuals in order to
prevent binge drinking among university students.
Key words: alcohol drinking; school health; social network analysis
INTRODUCTION
Excessive alcohol consumption accounts for an
important share of morbidity and mortality
among teenagers and young adults (Rehm et al.,
2009). The university is a key player in this issue:
an increasing percentage of younger people are
heading to university after secondary school
(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development and Centre for Educational
Research and Innovation, 2009) and this transition is often associated with more frequent and
risky drinking behaviour (Schulenberg and
Maggs, 2002).
In Europe, the consumption of alcohol among
teenagers is a rather recent topic of research. In
recent research, more than 40% of students aged
17– 30 in several European countries reported
having drunk heavily (Dantzer et al., 2006).
Risky drinking has also been found to be a
common practice (Stock et al., 2009). Although
some of this behaviour may become less frequent
as teenagers become adults, cohort studies
suggest that excessive alcohol behaviour, including problematic alcohol consumption, may
persist into adulthood, leading to a higher risk of
dependence (McCambridge et al., 2011). Thus,
reducing alcohol drinking during adolescence
and young adulthood is important for preventing
long-term adverse consequences in adulthood.
Programmes to limit excessive alcohol drinking
have relied on a wide range of preventive
675
676
V. Lorant and P. Nicaise
strategies, including educational or school approaches, community-based programmes and treatment within the health sector, regulations on
drinking, driving and advertising, and policies
affecting alcohol availability or price. Policies influencing the availability and the regulation of
alcohol marketing are more effective than information or educational approaches (Anderson
et al., 2009). A meta-analysis of individual-based
approaches confirmed that their effectiveness in
terms of reducing the quantity of drinking is
small, with an average effect size of ,0.20 of a
standard deviation (Carey et al., 2007). This has
led to something of a shift towards more
community-based educational approaches (Saltz
et al., 2010) rather than individual-based ones.
More recently, the cutting edge of community
health policy has relied on approaches that use
social norms (Pischke et al., 2012) and social ties
as the main preventive vehicle (Valente, 2010),
with promising results (Webel et al., 2010).
To date, alcohol consumption has been analysed from an individual perspective, with the
main focus on individual risk factors such as
gender, age, socio-economic status, personality,
psychological factors and drinking motives.
Alcohol consumption among university students,
however, takes place in a very specific social environment that includes independent living,
reduced social control, increased social homogeneity, wide availability of social activities such
as pre-gaming (i.e. drinking alcohol prior to
going out in order to prime oneself for the social
occasion ahead) (Read et al., 2010), drinking
games (Borsari et al., 2003) and other student
recreational activities. These social activities and
context affect alcohol consumption, partly
through norms, as the perception of the drinking
norm has been shown to be a potent predictor of
actual drinking in the USA (Borsari and Carey,
2003; Perkins et al., 2005) and in Europe (Lorant
et al., 2013).
Because of this social dimension, several
studies have investigated the role of peers in
alcohol-drinking behaviour (Delk and Meilman,
1996; D’Alessio et al., 2006; Keller et al., 2007;
Mcalaney and McMahon, 2007; McMahon et al.,
2007). However, most of these studies have
relied on cross-sectional surveys in which one’s
own drinking and peer drinking behaviour are
reported by the same individual (Alva, 1998;
Rose, 1999; Durkin et al., 2005). A couple of
recent social network surveys have investigated
the role of ties among the adult population
(Rosenquist et al., 2010) or at high school
(Ennett et al., 2006) in the USA. These studies
have shown that alcohol use increases when
people’s (best) friends drink more alcohol. With
the exception of one ego network study
(Reifman et al., 2006), there is a clear paucity of
work about the influence of social networks on
drinking habits among university students.
Our study applied Social Network Analysis
(SNA) to the study of risky drinking behaviour
among university students. We set out to analyse
the role of peers and of social position within a
university network in drinking behaviour. In particular, we hypothesized that social position in
the network affects drinking behaviour and that
cross-gender relationship is an important component of this drinking-network effect.
METHOD
Design and data source
This study is part of an important multi-method
investigation into alcohol drinking among university (...truncated)