Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with SH U 454 (Echovist) for the assessment of tubal patency.
Human Reproduction vol.13 no.11 pp.3049–3052, 1998
Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with
SH U 454 (Echovist®) for the assessment of tubal
patency
Marcos M.Reis1, Sergio R.Soares,
Marcelo L.Cancado and Aroldo F.Camargos
Servico de Reproducao Humana do Hospital das Clinicas da
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, avenida Alfredo Balena,
110, 90 andar, Belo Horizonte – MG – Brazil, Cep 30 150 260
1To
whom correspondence should be addressed at: 420 East 70th
Street Apt 2K New York, NY 10021, USA
A total of 88 Fallopian tubes from 44 patients was examined
with hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy), hysterosalpingogram (HSG), and laparoscopic chromopertubation (LC) in order to assess their relative accuracy for
measuring tubal patency. HyCoSy was done by transvaginal
ultrasound and the contrast was SH U 454 (Echovist®).
The flow of multiple fractions of the contrast medium
through each Fallopian tube was observed in real time in
appropriate imaging planes by means of a transvaginal
probe. Compared with laparoscopic results, we found a
sensitivity of 85.2%, a specificity of 85.2%, a positive
predictive value (PPV) of 71.9%, a negative predictive
value (NPV) of 92.9% and concordance (HyCoSy/LC) of
85.2%, while the corresponding values for HSG were
sensitivity J 85.2%, specificity J 83.6%, PPV J 69.7%,
NPV J 92.7% and concordance (HSG/LC) of 84.1%.
Compared with HSG results, HyCoSy obtained a copositivity of 66.7%, a co-negativity of 81.8% and a concordance of 76.1%. In conclusion, HyCoSy with SH U 454
proved to be a reliable and safe modality for evaluating
tubal patency; it is suitable as an outpatient diagnostic
procedure to be used before more invasive procedures.
Key words: Fallopian tube patency/HyCoSy/infertility/transvaginal ultrasound
Introduction
Between 8 and 20% of couples of reproductive age are infertile,
according to various epidemiological studies (Barad, 1991;
WHO, 1993). The main causes of infertility are male factor,
ovulatory and tubal disorders. Tubal disorder is the most
frequent female factor, occurring in up to 35% of infertile
women (Cates et al., 1991). It is a consequence of pelvic
inflammatory disease, endometriosis, pelvic surgery, ectopic
pregnancy, appendicitis with peritonitis and septic abortion.
Traditionally, hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy
and dye have been used to assess tubal function. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with contrast medium
has been used for such a purpose (Deichert et al., 1989; Schlief
and Deichert, 1991). It consists of endovaginal ultrasonography
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
with concomitant instillation of an ecogenic contrast medium
into the uterine cavity, using a catheter inserted in the uterine
cavity through the cervical os. It has been demonstrated that
HSG and HyCoSy have the same accuracy at detecting tubal
patency (Campbell et al., 1994; Heikkimen et al., 1995).
HyCoSy, however, offers a number of benefits over HSG as a
diagnostic test: the uterine cavity is better evaluated by
HyCoSy; there is no risk of anaphylaxis since there is no
iodide contrast; it is a less expensive test and causes less pain;
there is no radiation exposure; and it can be conducted by the
reproduction specialist themselves, at their office, allowing a
dynamic study of the patient’s pelvis (Schlief and Deichert,
1991; Deichert et al., 1992; Campbell et al., 1994).
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy
of HyCoSy in the assessment of tubal patency with regards to
HSG and laparoscopy and dye (gold standard).
Materials and methods
Patients
After our preliminary experience with hysterosonography (Reis et al.,
1997), we examined a total of 88 Fallopian tubes from 44 patients
with HyCoSy. Samples came from a consecutive series of patients
who presented with inability to conceive after 2 years of intercourse
without contraception and whose male partners had not shown severe
impaired sperm parameters. Altogether, 88 Fallopian tubes were
examined with HyCoSy, HSG, and laparoscopy and dye (LC). The
study was performed according to the Helsinki guidelines and after
approval by the Ethic Committee of Hospital das Clinicas of the
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Written informed
consent was obtained from all patients.
Conditions
Exclusion criteria included active pelvic inflammatory disease, galactosaemia, pregnancy, age ,18 years and women whose male partners
had had oligospermia (sperm count ,33106). Clinical findings
and laboratory parameters confirmed the criteria. The diagnostic
procedures (HyCoSy and HSG) were performed in the first half of
the cycle without anaesthesia and laparoscopy and dye was carried
out under general anaesthesia.
HyCoSy
A standard transvaginal ultrasound examination was followed by
transvaginal HyCoSy with SH U 454 (Echovist®; Schering AG,
Berlin, Germany), a galactose microparticle/air microbubble suspension. After the uterine cavity had been filled with Ringer’s solution
via the ZUI (Zinnanti Uterine Injector, Chatsworth, CA, USA)
catheter, the contour of the uterus was evaluated for the presence or
absence of leiomyoma, polyp, malformations or synechiae. After that,
the Echovist suspension was injected in 1–2 ml boluses whilst
scanning continuously. The flow of multiple fractions of the contrast
3049
M.M.Reis et al.
medium (SH U 454) through each Fallopian tube was observed in
real time in appropriate imaging planes by means of a transvaginal
probe (Figure 1).
If drainage into the tube was unimpeded, the echogenic fluid
formed a narrow white line within the tube and flow was seen on
real-time. No echogenic fluid was seen within occluded segments of
the tube, while a hydrosalpinx was seen as a collection of echogenic
fluid in the lateral portion of the tube. Each tube was examined as
far as the infundibulum as well as in the region around the ovary, to
demonstrate echogenic fluid spilling into the peritoneum. In patients
with bilateral tubal occlusion, distension of the uterine cavity was
seen without demonstration of echogenic fluid in the tubes; this
phenomenon is not usually seen in cases of unilateral tubal occlusion
because the fluid drains via the patent side. Antibiotic therapy was
given for patients who presented pathological findings at HyCoSy
procedure.
Sample size
Hulley (Hulley and Cummings, 1988) considers the studies with
diagnostic procedures such as descriptive study, suggesting the
following formula for sample size:
n 5 (4 * Z α2 * P * (1 – P))/W2
n 5 sample size; Zα 5 (1 – α) 5 (1 – 0.05) 5 1.96; P 5 expected
proportion; W 5 total width confidence interval.
Selecting the confidence level for the 95% interval, the sample
size varies according to sensitivity and specificity of the test and
total width of confidence interval desired for the test (Hulley and
Cummings, 1988). In our pilot study, we obtained a sensitivity of
100% and specificity of 91.7% and in published studies (Schlief and
Deich (...truncated)