Single aortic cross-clamp technique in coronary surgery: a prospective randomized study
EUROPEIIN ,O”P.NAL OF
CARDIO-THORACIC
SURGERY
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 12 (1997) 413-418
Single aortic cross-clamp technique in coronary surgery: a prospective
randomized study’
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,
Renzo Pessotto,
University of Verona Medical School, OCM Borg0 Trento, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
Received 4 December 1996; received in revised form 7 April 1997; accepted 25 April 1997
Abstract
Objective: To test the lrypothesis of an improved myocardial and cerebral prqtection by combining blood cardioplegia and the
single aortic cross-clamp technique, 100 patients were enrolled in a prospectively randomized study and stratitied for preoperative
conditions. Methods: In Group I, 55 patients underwent myocardial revascularization using crystalloid cardioplegia and the
conventional partial occluding clamp technique to perform proximal anastomoses, whereas in Group II, 45 patients were operated
on combining blood cardioplegia and the single aortic cross-clamp technique. Unstable angina, emergency procedures, reoperations and preoperative counterpulsation
accounted for an higher risk score in group II patients (P < 0.03). Operations were
performed by the same surgical team. Aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group II patients (59 + 22 vs. 47 + 18
min.) (P < 0.001). Other intraoperative variables were not significant. Results: A 70-year-old male in group I died on
post-operative day 5 as a consequence of a major neurological event. Length of ventilatory dependency, post-operative bleeding,
need for blood transfusions, ICU stay, and hospital stay were similar between the two groups (P = NS). Patients in group I
showed a strict correlation between the duration of surgical ischemia and post-operative myocardial necrosis. Analysis of
combined mortality and morbidity events (adverse events) between the two groups, led to a significant prevalence in group I
patients (P < 0.03) in spite of an higher pre-operative risk score and longer iscaemic times in group II patients. Neurological
lesions remained confined to group I patients. Conclusions: The combined use of blood cardioplegia, delivered via the antegrade
and retrograde routes, and the single-clamp technique to perform myocardial revascularization, might enhance myocardial and
cerebral protection when compared to conventional methods. Larger groups of patients are needed to support this trend. 0 1997
Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords:
Cardioplegia;
Myocardial protection
1. Introduction
In the last few years, indication for myocardial revascularization has been progressively extended to include
sicker patients with severely diseased coronary arteries,
poor left ventricular function; and often diffuse
*Corresponding author. Tel.: + 39 45 8072476; fax: + 39 45
8073308.
’ Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic, 6-9 October 1996.
IOIO-7940/97/%17.00
0 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PZZSlOlO-7940(97)00148-6
atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta. Similarly,
the spreading utilization of percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty (F’TCA) has indirectly selected for
surgical treatment those patients, often in poor clinical
conditions, with more diffuse coronary lesions. Facing
the challenge of operating on a more demanding cohort
of patients, the development of highly efficacious systems of myocardial protection soon appeared to be
mandatory. To this aim, a relatively recent advance was
represented by the use of a combination of antegrade
and retrograde routes for infusion of the cardioplegic
solution in order to achieve a more homogeneous distri-
Paolo Bertolini *, Francesco Santini, Giuseppe Montalbano,
Alessandro Mazzucco
414
P. Bertolini et al. /European
Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 12 (1997) 413-418
Table I
Patients population
Age
Weight
NYHA IV
Mainstem lesions
3 Vessels disease
Emergency
Unstable angina
Re-do operation
Pre-op IABP
Diabetes
LVEF <30%
GII
P value
63 48
72 + 9
12 (22%)
9 (16%)
33 (16%)
2 (3.6%)
1(13%)
2 (3.6%)
1 (1.8%)
16 (29%)
3 (3.5%)
62 * 8
76k 10
10 (22%)
5 (11%)
5 (11%)
5 (11%)
15 (33%)
4 (9%)
3 (6.7%)
9 (20%)
5 (11%)
Ns
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.03
NS
NS
NS
NS
of coronary disease. However, patients in GII had a
prevalence of unstable angina approaching statistical
significance. Patients undergoing emergency operations,
redo revascularization procedures, and those with preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation
were
also more frequent in GII (P = NS). Patients with
carotid artery disease were excluded from the study.
In our series, we adopted a stratification of the
pre-operative risk according to the criteria described for
patients undergoing coronary surgery at the Cleveland
Clinic [Ill. According to these criteria, 76% of all
patients were in the low risk class (score O-5), whereas
24% were in the high risk (score 6-10) (Fig. 1). Six
patients in GI and 18 in GII belonged to the high risk
class (P < 0.03).
2.1. Operative technique
Median sternotomy was followed by harvesting of
the internal mammary artery, when indicated. After
institution of cardiopulmonary by-pass using a double
stage venous cannula and venting the left ventricle,
rectal temperature was lowered down to 28°C in all
2. Patients and methods
A total of 100 patients who underwent myocardial
revascularization at the Department of Cardiovascular
Surgery of the University of Verona Medical School
(Italy) between November 1994 and December 1995
entered this study. There were 78 males and 22 females,
with a mean age of 62.2 + 8.2 years (range, 36-76
years). Informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to the enrollment in the study. Patients with
a recent history of myocardial infarction and those
needing associated procedures were excluded.
Pre-operative variables of patients in Group I (GI)
(no. = 55) and Group II (GII) (no. = 45) are reported
in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, sex and extension
GI
pre-operative risk score
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
I-5
26
Fig. 1. Pre-operative
risk score.
bution in the presence of diffuse coronary lesions [l-3].
In addition, different cardioplegic solutions were developed among which the use of blood cardioplegia, utilized according to different protocols, soon gained wide
popularity [4].
However, although the superiority of myocardial
protection provided by the use of blood cardiplegia
alone was clearly demonstrated in experimental studies,
its superiority in controlled clinical series appears still
to be controversial [5]. Indeed, also a prospective randomized trial developed at our Institution in the past
four years, where two group of patients underwent
revascularization using conventional surgical technique
and blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection, failed to show any statistically significant difference be (...truncated)