Quantitative imaging of plants: multi-scale data for better plant anatomy
| 343
species to better follow the mechanisms controlling seed production under changeable environments, which will be a continuing trait of importance for sustainable grain production
of our most important crops.
Keywords: Fertilization, flower, ovary, pericarp, pollination, wheat.
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 69, No. 3 pp. 341-343, 2018
doi:10.1093/jxb/erx430
References
Insight
Quantitative imaging of plants: multi-scale data for better
plant anatomy
David Legland*, Marie-Françoise Devaux and Fabienne Guillon
UR1268 Biopolymères, Interactions et Assemblages, INRA, France
* Correspondence:
The ongoing development of imaging systems continuously brings novel possibilities for the exploration
of plant anatomy at different scales. However, increasing resolution often results in a smaller field of view,
limiting the scope for wider conclusions. Staedler
et al. (2018) got round this problem by making use of
3D images acquired at two different scales to estimate the number of pollen grains within flowers. It is a
powerful approach, providing much more information
than with a single scale.
An understanding of the biological functions, development, or evolution of plants requires an accurate description of their anatomy at various scales: the whole organism,
its organs, tissues within each organ, cells within a tissue,
the cell walls, or the organelles within a cell. Depending on
the representative scale of the structures of interest, various
image acquisition devices can be employed to investigate their
morphology, chemical composition, or spatial organization
(Rousseau et al., 2015) (see Box 1).
Historically, microscopy has been the usual technique for
investigating plant anatomy at the cellular or tissue scale, and
the rise of confocal microscopy has allowed us to perceive
the 3D structure of tissues or organs with a resolution at
the micron level (Truernit et al., 2008). But new technologies – such as the recent development of super-resolution
techniques (e.g. PALM or STORM) or the introduction of
optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Lee et al., 2006) –
continuously bring novel imaging possibilities. For imaging
cell walls or organelles within the cells, electron microscopy
has often been the method of choice, reaching resolutions at
the nanometre scale. The 3D structure can also be assessed,
either by combining scanning electron microscopy with serial sectioning of the specimen (Bhawana et al., 2014), or
by adapting tomography algorithms to transmission electron microscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and
X-ray computed tomography are popular methods for the
non-destructive investigation of the 3D architecture of biological specimens, without the need for staining, sectioning or inclusion. The high resolution reached by computed
tomography (below the micron) often makes it the best
method for the investigation of plant organs (Stuppy et al.,
2003; Cloetens et al., 2006; Dhondt et al., 2010; Staedler
et al., 2013). Staedler et al. (2018) took advantage of this
resolution to quantify the 3D anatomy of orchid inflorescences, and through this showed differences in reproductive
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Chaudury A, Ming L, Miller C, Craig S, Dennis E, Peackok J. 1997.
Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant
Biology 94, 4223–4228.
Hucl P. 1996. Out-crossing rates for 10 Canadian spring wheat cultivars.
Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76, 423–427.
Longin CFH, Mühleisen J, Maurer HP, Zhang H, Gowda M, Reif JC.
2012. Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theoretical and Applied
Genetics 125, 1087–1096.
Martin TJ. 1990. Outcrossing in 12 hard red winter-wheat cultivars. Crop
Science 30, 59–62.
Mette MF, Gils M, Longin CFH, Reif JC. 2015. Hybrid breeding
in wheat. In: Ogihara Y, Takumi S, Handa H, eds. Advances in wheat
genetics: from genome to field. Tokyo: Springer.
Okada T, Jayasinghe R, Nansamba M, et al. 2017. Unfertilized ovary
pushes wheat flower open for cross-pollination. Journal of Experimental
Botany 68, 395–408.
Tester M, Langridge P. 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop
production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822.
Whitford R, Fleury D, Reif JC, Garcia M, Okada T, Korzun V,
Langridge P. 2013. Hybrid breeding in wheat: technologies to improve
hybrid wheat seed production. Journal of Experimental Botany 64,
5411–5428.
Wuest SE, Philipp MA, Guthörl D, Schmid B, Grossniklaus U. 2016.
Seed production affects maternal growth and senescence in Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiology 171, 392–404.
344 |
Box 1. Multi-scale imaging of wheat grain
investment between inflorescences of rewarding and deceiving orchids.
The physical properties of image acquisition devices limit
the total quantity of information that can be gained, and so
there is a compromise between a high resolution and a large
field of view. When the spatial resolution is too low, the smallest structures are difficult to identify. On the other hand, the
smaller the field of view, the more difficult it is to cover the
totality of the organ of interest with a reasonable acquisition time. The increase in resolution of reconstructed images
therefore often corresponds to a reduction in the size of the
field of view. This difficulty was encountered in the work of
Staedler et al. (2018): the structures of interest (pollen grains)
could not be imaged with a resolution that allowed their
identification while taking into account the whole reference
structure (the pollinium, an aggregate of pollen grains). The
strategy adopted to circumvent this difficulty was to acquire
images at two different resolutions. Images acquired at finer
resolution were used for segmentation and counting the pollen grains; images at a coarser resolution were used for assessing the size and shape of the reference structure. The total
number of pollen grains was then estimated by combining
their numerical density with the volume of the pollinium. It is
an approach which exemplifies how data obtained at different
resolutions may be used together to provide much more information than data at a single resolution.
The multi-scale investigation of plant tissues is undoubtedly
a promising strategy for a better description and understanding of plant anatomy. However, investigation and integration
of images, obtained both at different scales and using different imaging modalities (see below), raise new methodological
questions (Rousseau et al., 2015).
Joint exploration of multi-scale images
Investigating plant anatomy at different scales often relies on
different imaging modalities. A common approach in microscopy for combining these (...truncated)