IN THE MATTER OF MIKKLESEN'S PATENT AND IN THE MATTER OF KNUDSEN'S PATENT
12
N·o. 1.]
REPORTS OF PATENT, DESIGN, AND TRAm: MARK CASES.
[Vol. XLIV.
In the Matter of Savage's Applioation for the Registration of Trade Marks
(Nos. 444,620 and 444,621).
differentiation. It is a matt'er of memory to decide the purpose or associa,tion
of the words respectively.".
•
But, even if there were no risk of the one word heing taken for the other,
so that every member of the public would know that" Nujol " and" Nuvola"
designated different things, the matter is not concluded in favour of the 5
Applicant. For, to adapt once, more the words of the Master of the Rolls, in
their appearance and sound the two words seem to belong to ,a s,eries of
associa,ted trade marks to which Sections 24 to 26 might be applicable, or, to
a~apt the words of Lordi Justice Sargant, "Even if the slight distinction
"hetween 'Nujol' and 'Nuvola' were noticed, yet having regard to the 10
"ordinary practice of large producers to register a se,ries of similar marks
"to denote various grades of their produce, it seems to me highly probable
"that an infer,ence 'Of identity of origin would be drawn."
For these reasons, I have ICOme to the conclusion that the' Applicant has,
to say the least, left the matter in dubio. That being so, it follows that, in 15
my opinion, the learned Registrar was right in r,efusing the applica,tion. The
appeal will be dismissed with costs to be paid by the Applicant, except in so
far as the costs were increased by the charge of fraud. The Applicant's costs,
so far as they were increased by that charge, must be paid by the Opponents,
and there will be the usual set-off.
20
Hanworth.-My Lord, I take it that refers to the Application in Class 42
and the Application in Class 3 7
ROMER, J.-Yes, both of them. There will be the usual Order as to the costs
of the Registrar.
IN TIlE HIGH COURT OF JUSTIqE-CHANCERY DIVISION.
25
Before MR. JUSTICE TOMLIN.
May 13th, 1926.
IN THE Mj\,TTER OF MIKKLESEN'S PATENT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF KNUDSEN'S PATENT,
Patents-Application by Originating Summons for extensions of the terms
of the Patents-Patents two of b, group relating to same inventions-Patentee
30
13
Vol. XLIV. ]
REPORTS OF PATENT, DESIGN, AND TRADE MARK CASES.
[No.1.
In the Matter of Mikklesen's Patent and In the Matter of Knauleen's Patent.
as m,ch-One Patera having more than a year to run-Five years' extension
granted in the case of each Patent-e-Patents and Designs .A.cts 1907 and 1919,
Sectlen. 18, Sub-section (6).
M. and K. were the Grantees of two Patents to which D.O. uiere entitled in
[) equity at the date of the grtlnt. The Patents were two of a group relating to
the use of Diesel engines for marine purposes. In 1912 D.C. solid. to A.O. (inter
alia) the benefit of the Patents. A. O. transferred their rights to a subsidiary
company, S.O. In 1917 H. & W. acquired the whole of the share capital in
S.O. uihose business had become a branch of H. & W.'s business. In 1920 the
10 Patents urere assigned to H. & ,We subject to a couenasit to re-assign to D.O.
on the termination. of an agreement uihich. could not happen before 1932. ·
H. & W., S.O. and D'.C. applied by Originating Summons for extensions of
the terms of the Patents. Evidence was g·iven that owing to co-usee arising out
of the ioar the introduction of Diesel enqines for marine purposes had been
J 5 considerably retarded.
An extension of five years was granted in the case of each Patent, the
extensions being individual.
Letters Patent (No. 27,849 of 1910) (with Convention date the 3rd of May, 1910)
were granted to Vilhelni M ikkleserc in respect of an invention of "Improve20 "ments in and relating to Fuel Injection for Internal Combustion Engines."
Letters Patent (No. 14,946 of 1911) were granted (dated the 26th of June,
1911) to Ivar Peter 13agger Knudsen in respect of au invention of
"Improved Reversing Mechanism for Internal Oombustion Engines." On
the 27th of July, 1925, Harland & Wolff Ld., The Burmeister and Wain
25 (D!£esel System) Oil Engine Co. Ld. and Aktieselskabet Burmeister and Wain's
j/askin og Skibsbyggery applied by Originating Summons for an extension
of the terms of the Patents,
Affidavits in support of the Application were rna,de by John Philp (Secretary of the two first named Applicant Compa.nies), Frederic Ernest Rebbeck
30 (Director of the two firat named Applicant Companies), Owen Cosby Baron
Kylsant (Chairman of various shippi ng companies), Hans Henrik Blache
(Managing Director of the last named Applicant Company) and Vilhelrn.
Mikkelsen from which it appeared (inter alia) that the Patents were two of
a considerable number grantfed for inventions connected with the Burmeister
35 and Wa.in Diesel Engine, and that at the date when they had been grant.ed
they had belonged in equity to the Applicants Aktieseiskobet Burmeister and
W a,in' s J11 ask.in. og Skibsbyggerri (referred to as "The Danish Oompany");
that in Novemher, 1910, the Danish Company, in 'Consideration of royalty payments oalcula.ted on brake horse pow,er, had gra,nted to Barclom Curle &: Co. Ld.
40 the 'Sole right of manufacturing in the United Kingdom internal combustion
oil engines of the Diesel. type of Burmeister & Wain's design, and that in
October, 1'911, the Danish Company had entered into a similar agreement with
Swan, H unter & W ighalll' Richardson Ld. in respect of internal combustion
oil engines of the Diesel type. of the Danish Company's design; that on the
14
NO.1.]
REPORTS OF PATENT, DESIGN, AND TRADE MARK CASES.
[Vol. XLIV.
In the Matter of Mikklesen's Patent and In the Matter of Krnidsen'» Patent.
27th of Ma-rch, 1912, the Danish Oompany agreed to sell to the Atlas Mercantile
Co. Ld. (referred to as "The Atlas Oompany") as rega-rds all parts of the
world except Denmark and its colonies and Sweden the benefit and right so
far as the Danish Oompany could confer the same to use and exercise the
Burmeister & Wain system of Diesel engine construction and the henefit of 5
all patents relating to the said system owned or controlled by the Danish
Oompany, but reserving to the Danish Oompany·the right to sell and deliver
in any part of the world engines or machinery made in Denmark or its colonies
or Sweden, and the right to receive the royalties payable under the licences
granted by the Danish Oompany to Barclay C11Jrle &-Co. Dd. and Sioan, Hunter 10
&. Wigham Richardson Ld. ; that on the 29th of March, 1912, a, subsidia-ry Company, the Applicants, The Burmeister & TVain (Diesel System) Oil Engine
Co. Ld. (referred to as "The Scottish Oompany") had been .incorporated,
and that by an agreement dated the 30th of March, 1912, in consideration of
the issue to the Atlas Oompany of the whole of the deferred capital in the 15
Scottish Oompany the Atlas Oompany had sold to the Scottish Oompany (inter
alia) so far as regards Great Britain, the henefitand right so far as the Danish
Company could confer the same to use and exercise the Burmeister & Wai n
system of Diesel engine construction and the b (...truncated)