Reply to the editorial entitled ‘the European strategy on alcohol: a landmark and a lesson’ by B. Baumberg and P. Anderson
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 507, 2007
Advance Access publication 8 October 2007
doi:10.1093/alcalc/agm070
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
REPLY TO THE EDITORIAL ENTITLED ‘THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY ON ALCOHOL:
A LANDMARK AND A LESSON’ BY B. BAUMBERG AND P. ANDERSON
PIERRE-OLIVIER BERGERON
Deputy-Secretary General, The Brewers of Europe, Rue Caroly 23-25, B-1040 Bruxelles
(Received 17 April 2007; first review notified 3 June 2007; in revised form 23 July 2007; accepted 24 July 2007;
advance access publication 8 October 2007)
I read with great interest the Editorial by Messrs Baumberg
and Anderson in Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 1–2, 2007, of Alcohol
and Alcoholism, and would like to share with you the
following thoughts. I am writing this in a personal capacity,
and the views expressed in this letter should not be interpreted
as the official position of The Brewers of Europe.
The adoption by the European Commission (EC) of a
Communication on an EU Strategy to support Member States
in reducing alcohol-related harm, and its endorsement by the
Member States, indeed constitute a landmark. In fact, the key
milestone is the setting up of the EU Alcohol and Health
Forum (1), as an essential provision of the Communication.
The Forum aims to provide a common platform for all
interested stakeholders at the EU level that pledge to step
up actions relevant to reducing alcohol-related harm. That
the EC and the Member States promote the multi-stakeholder
approach as a way forward in addressing alcohol-related harm
is an extremely promising, though challenging, gesture. By
definition, all those stakeholders who have signed the Forum’s
Charter (2) endorse this approach. If this endorsement is
genuine, there may be a chance that the classical, extremely
polarised and sterile sort of debate we all have participated in
for years may be transformed into an exchange of experience
whereby those around the table talk to each other rather than
speak at each other. There is no doubt that participation in
the Forum will be demanding for anyone being a Member.
But that is the deal.
While I fully agree with Messrs Baumberg and Anderson
that the Commission Communication and the Alcohol and
Health Forum are a chance for further research in an often
under-funded area, I have great difficulty in accepting an
association of words such as ‘evidence game’. There is no
evidence game. In fact, there is evidence, or there is no
evidence. Wherever there is a knowledge or evidence gap,
this gap should be addressed. This is simple reasoning, but it
is common sense. It is the reasoning which led The Brewers of
Europe and other sectors to call for a peer review process for
the Alcohol in Europe report. It is exactly the same reasoning
that applied to the examination of the Weinberg Group’s
review (3) of literature by a panel of experts.
In fact, what is at stake? Do we want to see less people
injured or killed on European roads? Do we want to see
fewer minors drink? Do we want to see less binge drinking
in those countries where such a drinking pattern seems to
prevail? Do we want to see less negative medical conditions
associated with misuse and more benefits associated with
appropriate consumption? Do we want to better understand
how responsible drinking behaviour can be fostered? Whoever
the stakeholder, are not these goals a little federating?
(1) http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph determinants/life style/
alcohol/alcohol charter en.htm
(2) http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph determinants/life style/
alcohol/documents/Alcohol charter2007.pdf
(3) http://www.weinberggroup.com/Independent-ReviewAlcohol-Consumption-in-Europe-Report-12June06.pdf
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at:
Deputy-Secretary General, The Brewers of Europe, Rue Caroly 23-25,
B-1040 Bruxelles. Tel: (+32) 025 511 810; Fax: (+32) 026 609 402;
http://www.brewersofeurope.org
The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved
(...truncated)