Shell Objects from Tell Rad Shaqrah (Syria)
Dariusz Szeląg
Shell Objects from Tell Rad Shaqrah
(Syria)
Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean 22, 587-616
2010
Shell objects from Tell Rad Shaqrah (Syria)
Syria
Shell objects from
Tell Rad Shaqrah (Syria)
Dariusz Szeląg
Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw
Abstract: Polish excavations at Tell Rad Shaqrah in northeastern Syria revealed remains of a settlement dated primarily to the second half of the 3rd millennium BC. The paper presents a collection
of beads and pendants made of shell and nacre from Rad Shaqrah, mostly from funerary contexts.
These beads and pendants find parallels among finds from sites in northern Syria and Mesopotamia
(Tell al-Raqa’i, Tell Beydar, Tell Brak, Tell Bi’a, Tawi, Qara Quzaq, Mari etc.) and also from southern Mesopotamia (Ur, Uruk, Abu Salabikh). Among the shell artifacts there are also items made of
exotic shells, which raises the question of trade and exchange of shells in northern Mesopotamia in
the 3rd millennium BC.
Keywords: Tell Rad Shaqrah, shell/nacre artifacts, personal adornment, beads, zoomorphic
pendants, quadrupeds
The site
From the late 1980s through the mid1990s Polish archaeologists participated
in an international archaeological salvage
program initiated in connection with
the building of the Hassake Dam on the
Khabur river in northeastern Syria (International Salvage Program of the Hassake
Dam Area). The Hassake Southern Dam
Project covered one of the areas under
investigation and Tell Rad Shaqrah was
the northernmost site in this area. It was
excavated in 1991–1995 by a team from
the Polish Centre of Mediterranean
1
Archaeology of the University of Warsaw
headed by Prof. Piotr Bieliński.1
Tell Rad Shaqrah was a small tell,
approximately 140 m by 120 m, rising 8 m
above ground level (305 m a.s.l.), located
on the eastern bank of the river about
15 km southeast of Hassake [Fig. 1]. Excavations uncovered the remains of a small
settlement from the second half of the
3rd millennium BC (Early Dynastic III).
Possible earlier occupation of the site was
suggested by a smattering of potsherds
attributed to Late Ninevite 5 culture
For preliminary field reports, see Bieliński 1992; 1993; 1994; 1995; 1996. On excavations at Tell Rad Shaqrah, see also
Koliński 1996.
587
PAM 22, Research 2010
Dariusz Szeląg
Syria
and a single pot-stand of Bichrome Ware
(Koliński 1996). The site was settled also
in the Akkadian period and after a long
interval again in the Iron Age, in the NeoAssyrian period (Koliński 1996: 67; Reiche
1999).
Shell finds from
Tell Rad Shaqrah
Excavations produced both unworked
shells and artifacts made of shell,2 but
neither were ever studied by specialists.
The shells were not properly identified
Fig. 1. Contour plan of Tell Rad Shaqrah showing the location of excavated areas (object inventory
numbers in the catalogue herein are coded by the letters designating individual trenches)
(Drawing A. Schneider; digitizing M. Wagner)
2
The excavation register from Tell Rad Shaqrah listed altogether 71 shells or fragments of shells: 22 were described as
bivalves, the rest as shells. The latter group could have included more bivalves, but also, for example, land snails, the presence of which in archaeological layers could have been natural after all and not necessarily from the 3rd millennium BC.
588
PAM 22, Research 2010
Shell objects from Tell Rad Shaqrah (Syria)
Syria
to species, which would have been of
particular importance had any exotic shells
been found. The author has attempted to
identify shell species based on drawings
and photos, but the results cannot be considered as binding. Species identification
is a broader issue which has been brought
up also with regard to the origin of shell
raw material used in Mesopotamia as well
as ready shell products from this region
(e.g., Gensheimer 1984: 65–67, 69–72;
Moorey 1999: 129–130). Identification is
especially difficult with regard to highly
worked forms (Gensheimer 1984: 65).
Shells in Mesopotamia
Mollusks3 were used in Mesopotamia and
the entire Near East from the earliest periods,
from the Paleolithic as food (von den
Driesch 1995: 350, listing terrestrial,
freshwater and marine species from the
Near East) and from the Neolithic and
early Chalcolithic as ornaments, mainly
because of the durability of the material
(Gensheimer 1984: 67, Musche 1992:
9, 12, 31, see also Pl. VII: 1, 4, 5.2–5.6,
examples from Ubaid culture). Intensive
use of shells in Mesopotamia, both natural
and as worked products, is observed
from the turn of the 4th millennium BC
(Gensheimer 1984: 67).
From the Epipaleolithic shells were the
object of exchange, trade in these products
intensifying in the 3rd and 2nd millennia BC often between very distant regions
(von den Driesch 1995: 351). Shell artifacts found in Mesopotamia frequently
originated from the Gulf of Oman; starting from the mid-3rd millennium BC or
slightly later they also came from coastal
India either directly or through intermediaries like the merchants of Oman
(Gensheimer 1984: 65–67, 72). It has
been pointed out (Moorey 1999: 129) that
while the use of perforated shells as ornaments began from prehistoric times, it was
in the 3rd millennium BC, especially in
the ED II and ED III, that production of
shell artifacts boomed. It does not come
as a surprise because it was also a period of
extensive trade contacts with regions where
shells of marine snails used in craftwork,
were commonly available.
The role of shells in cult practices
(von den Driesch 1995: 351–354) or
more broadly socio-ritual functions
(Gensheimer 1984: 65, 67) has been
recognized based on texts of a magical
nature and the context of some of the shell
finds (temples, foundation deposits). It has
been confirmed by the presence of shells
and shell artifacts in deposits from Ashur
(e.g., Ishtar temple, Ashur-Enlil ziggurat,
see Andrae 1935: 24–25, 54–57, Pls 26:a,
27:a-b, Middle- and Neo-Assyrian), Mari
(e.g., Ninhursag temple, see Beyer, JeanMarie 2007, ED III), Nineveh (so-called
“Perlenstratum” probably connected with
the Ishtar temple, see Gut et alii 2001,
ED III–Akkadian), Tell Bi’a (Temple C, see
Bivalves could have been part of the diet of the inhabitants of Tell Rad Shaqrah, which lies on the Khabur. Bivalves were
consumed in the Near East from the Paleolithic and the most common species found on the banks of the Tigris and
Euphrates rivers was Unio tigridis (von den Driesch 1995: 350). The bivalves shells from Tell Rad Shaqrah may have
represented the most common species of Unio tigridis, Unionacea order of river bivalves (von den Driesch 1995: 350).
3
Mollusks are extremely numerous, divided into several classes. Of interest for the purposes of this study are the ones that
form shells: snails (Gastropoda), tusk shells (Scaphopoda) and bivalves (Bivalvia).
589
PAM 22, Research 2010
Dariusz Szeląg
Syria
Miglus, Strommenger 2002: Pls 129–131)
and other sites. In Nineveh shell beads
constituted the second lar (...truncated)