Religion, law and human rights in post-conflict Liberia

AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL Religion, law and human rights in post-conflict Liberia Gwendolyn Heaner* Department of the Study of Religions, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, United Kingdom Summary Liberia has had a turbulent recent history, and today deals with extreme poverty, high crime, ethnic tensions, widespread impunity and corruption. In addition to this, there is a complex and contradictory relationship between law and religion, which further complicates the ongoing efforts towards peace building and reconstruction. This paper aims to highlight the fundamental question of whether certain laws and human rights — in this case, religious or cultural freedom — can or should be actively promoted by the state and by society in such a unique scenario as fragile, post-conflict Liberia. The paper first addresses this question with respect to the country’s contradictory dual-justice system, highlighting the problems that arise when the weak state struggles to enforce statutory and human rights law, while much of the population still sees legitimate justice to be rooted in traditional mechanisms, such as trials by ordeal, which oppose these laws. The second section of the paper considers the extent to which all Liberians enjoy religious freedom. It is shown that, while Liberia is de facto a secular state, it is essentially de jure a Christian country. Although there are historically and presently few indications of unrest based strictly on religion, it is argued that there is underlying religious tension that makes it dangerous for the state or society to suggest any major integration of Islam into public life. Some of this tension can be attributed to the growing number of Pentecostal and charismatic churches, which are especially vocal about the encroachment of non-Christians. However, because of Liberia’s fragility, it might be the case that promoting religious equality and actively eliminating the Christian bias might cause more harm than good in Liberia today. * BA (Northampton), MA Study of Religions (SOAS, London), PhD candidate, Department of the Study of Religions (SOAS) researching the socio-political role of Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity in post-conflict Liberia, in-country for fieldwork from September 2007 until July 2008; 458 RELIGION, LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN POST-CONFLICT LIBERIA 1 459 Introduction A consideration of the relationship between religion, law and human rights is a critical endeavour that has been attracting interest from a variety of fields in recent decades. It is becoming increasingly apparent that, when dealing with legal issues, one cannot sideline religion and its significant implications in a world that is not secularising, as past theorists so strongly argued. As Witte poignantly writes, ‘Religion is an ineradicable condition of human lives and human communities … provides many of the sources and scales of values by which persons and people govern themselves …’1 Examining varieties of religious beliefs, which are often inextricably linked with varieties of cultural practices,2 with respect to law and human rights, opens the door for a number of questions. Are human rights universal or culturally specific?3 More specifically, should traditional cultural practices be protected when aspects of human rights law are antithetical to such tradition?4 To what extent should religious practices of one person or group be allowed to impinge on the religious practices of another? When should freedom to practise a religion be restricted if it conflicts with other human rights laws? When is one group’s right to proselytise a violation of another’s right to fight against such unwanted encroachment? The complicated, contradictory and unstable relationship between religion, law and human rights in Liberia, combined with the country’s turbulent recent history, ethnic tensions and current state of widespread impunity and corruption, risks impeding ongoing efforts towards peace building and reconstruction, unless these issues are addressed by the government and society at large. In this essay, I address two aspects of this relationship: first, the contradictory dual-justice system and traditional justice mechanisms and, second, the extent to which Liberians enjoy religious freedom, especially with respect to an evident 1 2 3 4 J Witte Jr ‘Law, religion, and human rights: A historical Protestant perspective’ (1998) 26 Journal of Religious Ethics 257. The concept of ‘culture’ and ‘religion’ and how they relate to one another, is a contentions topic which has received an enormous amount of scholarly attention. See especially T Masuzawa ‘Culture’ in M Taylor (ed) Critical terms for religious studies (1998) 70-93; J Smith ‘Religion, religions, religious’ in Taylor (above) 269-284. For the purposes of this paper, ‘religion’ will be used to describe any belief system that specifically has to do with spiritual, cosmological or metaphysical issues and includes all forms of African traditional religions and monotheistic religions. ‘Culture’ will refer to the broader idea of the ‘means of adapting to the physical world and creating systems of meaning through which experience can be interpreted; all human beings, by definition, are rooted in culture’, as defined in M Moran Liberia: The violence of democracy (2006) 19. S Ilesanmi ‘Human rights discourse in modern Africa: A comparative religious ethical perspective’ (1995) 23 Journal of Religious Ethics 293-295. A An-Na’im ‘The contingent universality of human rights: The case of freedom of expression in African and Islamic contexts (1997) 11 Emory International Law Review 30 53-54. 460 (2008) 8 AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL Christian bias. In the process, I highlight important issues regarding the extent to which certain human rights — in this case, religious or cultural freedom — can be actively promoted in such a unique scenario as fragile, post-conflict Liberia. 2 Liberia: Africa’s oldest republic recovering from war 2.1 From pseudo-colony to dictatorship The area which is now Liberia was settled upon in 1822 by freed American slaves under the aegis of the pseudo-humanitarian American Colonization Society (ACS).5 The sovereign state of Liberia was established in 1847 by these settlers who later established the True Whig Party (TWP) that ruled from 1858 to 1980.6 These settlers, known as Americo-Liberians, were never more than 5% of the population, yet effectively ran the state with little to no participation from indigenous Liberians, and largely for their personal benefit.7 By 1980, despite then-President Tolbert’s attempts to further incorporate indigenous Liberians into politics, corruption and inefficiency had left the state without a channel through which non-Americo-Liberian political views and organisations could be effectively incorporated into government.8 On 12 April 1980, Master-Sergeant Samuel K Doe staged a bloody coup with 16 other (...truncated)