Effect of an Organo-Modified Montmorillonite on the Barrier Properties of PET Nanocomposites Using a Polyester Ionomer as a Compatibilizing Agent
© 2017
Materials Research. 2017; 20(3): 826-834
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0751
Effect of an Organo-Modified Montmorillonite on the Barrier Properties of PET
Nanocomposites Using a Polyester Ionomer as a Compatibilizing Agent
Suel Eric Vidottia*, Anne Cristine Chinellatoa, Guo-Hua Hub, Luiz Antonio Pessanc
Centro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC
(CECS/UFABC), Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco A, Torre 1, sala 618, Bairro Santa Terezinha,
CEP: 09210-580, Santo André, SP, Brazil
b
Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (CNRS UMR 7274), Ecole Nationale Supérieure
des Industries Chimiques (LRGP/ENSIC), Université de Lorraine, 1 rue Grandville, BP 20451,
Nancy F-54001, France
c
Departamento de Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (DEMa/UFSCar),
Via Washington Luiz, km 235, P. O. Box 676, 13565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil
a
Received: October 04, 2016; Revised: March 15, 2017; Accepted: April 21, 2017
Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/organically modified montmorillonite (PET/o-Mt) nanocomposites
were prepared via melt intercalation in a twin-screw extruder using a polyester ionomer (PETi) as
compatibilizer. The o-Mt content used was 0, 1, 3 or 5 wt% and the compatibilizer/o-Mt mass ratio was
0/1, 1/1 or 3/1. The main objective was to study the effects of the addition of o-Mt and compatibilizer
on the barrier properties of PET/o-Mt nanocomposites. The nanocomposites showed a significant
reduction in CO2 permeability of up to 50% when compared to the neat PET, without significant
change in the CO2 solubility revealing the importance of the diffusional path imputed by the organoclay
on the overall permeation process. Water vapor permeability was reduced for all nanocomposites,
achieving up to 30% reduction for the nanocomposite containing a compatibilizer/o-Mt mass ratio of
1/1. Overall, the nanocomposite containing 5 wt% of organoclay and compatibilizer/o-Mt mass ratio
of 1/1 showed the best barrier properties.
Keywords: PET nanocomposite, Organoclay, Polyester ionomer compatibilizer, Barrier properties,
Permeability
1. Introduction
The use of nano-scale fillers has led to the development
of polymer nanocomposites and has provided a potential
alternative to conventional polymer composites. Polymerlayered silicate nanocomposites prepared with an organically
modified montmorillonite (o-Mt) are of increasing interest
for packaging applications. These nanocomposites show
improved mechanical and barrier properties compared to
the corresponding neat polymer matrix and conventional
composites due to the nano-scale reinforcement and the
tortuous diffusion path caused by the high aspect ratio
of aluminosilicate layers1-5. In order to maximize these
benefits it is necessary to achieve a high level of organoclay
exfoliation, uniform distribution and appropriate orientation
of clay platelets6-9.
Among various processes, the following two are
considered as being commercially attractive for preparing
layered silicate based polymer nanocomposites: in situ
polymerization and melt compounding10,11. The second one
is especially appealing because classical melt compounding
equipment and standard processing conditions can be used.
Depending on the nature of the components used (layered
* e-mail:
silicate, organic modifier, polymer matrix and compatibilizer)
and preparation process, three main types of composites
may be obtained: conventional composite and intercalated
or exfoliated nanocomposites10.
In conventional composites, the polymer is unable to
intercalate silicate layers. Thus its properties are not very
different from that of traditional microcomposites. Intercalated
nanocomposites show a well-ordered multilayered structure
(alternating polymer and inorganic layers) in which polymer
chains are inserted into the interlayer spaces between
individual silicate layers. Exfoliated nanocomposites are
achieved when individual silicate layers are completely
separated and uniformly distributed in the polymer matrix10.
Properties of intercalated and exfoliated nanocomposites are
usually significantly improved compared to conventional
composites or the neat polymer.
However, it is not always possible to reach an intercalated
or exfoliated state of dispersion of layered silicate particles
by melt compounding12. Optimal mixing conditions and
adequate surface treatment of silicates should be applied to
prepare exfoliated nanocomposites12-16. The use of polymers
containing polar functional groups and/or ionomers as
compatibilizers also promotes the dispersion of silicates and
may lead to intercalated and/or exfoliated nanocomposites17-21.
Effect of an Organo-Modified Montmorillonite on the Barrier Properties of PET Nanocomposites Using a
Polyester Ionomer as a Compatibilizing Agent
The gas permeation in a homogeneous polymer matrix
is governed by a mechanism of diffusion and solubility. The
diffusion coefficient (D) describes the kinetic aspect of the
transport whereas the solubility coefficient (S) reflects the
penetrant/polymer affinity and the thermodynamic aspect
of the transport. In the case of a Fickian transport, the
permeability coefficient (P) can be expressed by22:
P = D.S
(1)
827
This work was concerned with the preparation of poly(ethylene
terephthalate)/organically modified montmorillonite (PET/oMT) nanocomposites via melt compounding, using a polyester
ionomer as compatibilizer. The main objective was to study
the effects of the concentrations of o-MT and compatibilizer
on the barrier properties of these nanocomposites.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
A similar model has been considered to describe the gas
transport properties of composites in which impermeable
fillers are dispersed in a polymer matrix. Assuming that the
filler does not absorb or conduct the penetrant, the local
polymer matrix is not affected by the presence of the filler
and the polymer/filler interactions are sufficiently strong
enough to avoid void formation at the interfaces, the gas
solubility in the composite can be expressed as23:
S = S 0 (1 - z)
(2)
where S0 is the penetrant solubility coefficient in the pure
polymer matrix and ϕ is the volumetric fraction of particles
dispersed in the matrix.
In this approximation, the penetrant solubility does
not depend on the morphological features of the phases.
However, the diffusion process of the penetrant is more
complex. The particles act as impenetrable barriers so that
the penetrant must follow an elongated (or tortuous) path in
order to diffuse through the composite24. The diffusion rate
of the penetrant is slowed down and can be expressed as:
D = D 0 /x
(3)
where D0 is the diffusion coefficient in the neat polymer,
D the apparent diffusion coefficient in the nanocomposites
and τ the tortuosity.
For semi-crystalline polymers the permeation process is
even more complex. Semi-crystalline polymers are discussed
as materials consisting of two phases, namely th (...truncated)