Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia
(2019) 12:188
Saeed et al. Parasites Vectors
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4
Parasites & Vectors
Open Access
REVIEW
Systematic review of gastrointestinal
nematodes of horses from Australia
Muhammad A. Saeed1, Ian Beveridge1, Ghazanfar Abbas1, Anne Beasley2, Jenni Bauquier1, Edwina Wilkes3,
Caroline Jacobson4, Kris J. Hughes3, Charles El‑Hage1, Ryan O’Handley5, John Hurley6, Lucy Cudmore7,
Peter Carrigan7, Lisa Walter8, Brett Tennent‑Brown1, Martin K. Nielsen9 and Abdul Jabbar1*
Abstract
Background: Equine gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) have been the subject of intermittent studies in Australia
over the past few decades. However, comprehensive information on the epidemiology of equine GINs, the efficacy
of available anthelmintic drugs and the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in Australasia is lacking. Herein, we
have systematically reviewed existing knowledge on the horse GINs recorded in Australia, and main aspects of their
pathogeneses, epidemiology, diagnoses, treatment and control.
Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for publications on GINs of Australian horses that met our inclusion
criteria for the systematic review. Subsets of publications were subjected to review epidemiology, diagnoses, patho‑
geneses, treatment and control of GINs of horses from Australia.
Results: A total of 51 articles published between 1950 to 2018 were included. The main GINs reported in Austral‑
ian horses were cyathostomins (at least 28 species), Draschia megastoma, Habronema muscae, H. majus, Oxyuris equi,
Parascaris equorum, Strongyloides westeri and Trichostrongylus axei across different climatic regions of Queensland,
New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia. Nematodes are diagnosed based on the traditional McMaster egg
counting technique, though molecular markers to characterise common GINs of equines were characterised in 1990s.
The use of anthelmintic drugs remains the most widely-used strategy for controlling equine GIN parasites in Australia;
however, the threshold of faecal egg count that should trigger treatment in horses, remains controversial. Further‑
more, anthelmintic resistance within GIN population of horses is becoming a common problem in Australia.
Conclusions: Although GINs infecting Australian horses have been the subject of occasional studies over the past
few decades, the effective control of GIN infections is hampered by a generalised lack of knowledge in various dis‑
ciplines of equine parasitology. Therefore, coordinated and focused research is required to fill our knowledge gaps
in these areas to maximise equine health and minimise economic losses associated with the parasitic infections in
Australia.
Keywords: Gastrointestinal nematodes, Strongyles, Anthelmintic resistance, Horse, Australia
*Correspondence:
1
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee,
VIC, Australia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/
publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Saeed et al. Parasites Vectors
(2019) 12:188
Background
Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) occur ubiquitously
in horses (Equus caballus) and present a major veterinary concern throughout the world including in Australia. Strongylid (family Strongylidae) nematodes such
as strongylins (large strongyles) and cyathostomins
(small strongyles) are the main internal nematode parasites of horses constituting more than 75% of the total
parasite fauna [1, 2]. Non-strongylid GINs found in
horses include Parascaris equorum, Habronema spp.,
Draschia megastoma, Oxyuris equi, Trichostrongylus
axei and Strongyloides westeri [3–5].
Due to conducive climatic conditions, GINs have
been widely reported in horses from different agroclimatic regions across Australia [3, 4, 6–8]. These
parasites have been associated with a variety of clinical signs, including unthriftiness, reduced stamina,
retarded growth, abdominal distension (‘pot-belly’),
diarrhea, abdominal pain and death, especially in young
and immunocompromised horses [9–11]. Encysted
cyathostomins cause larval cyathostominosis, a condition characterised by synchronous emergence of parasitic larvae from the large intestinal mucosa that can
result in acute or chronic diarrhea, weight loss and, in
some cases, death [4, 12–14].
Only limited information is available on the epidemiology and clinicopathology of equine GINs in Australia and
the available information comes from selected regions.
There are no detailed studies on equine GINs of horses
in all different regions of the country which vary dramatically in climatic conditions from the northern tropical parts to the temperate southern areas. The impact of
epidemiological factors on equine GIN prevalence and
their clinical significance in Australia cannot be predicted based on the information from other regions of
the world because of inter-continental climatic differences. Furthermore, climatic differences among regions
within Australia might also have an effect on parasite epidemiology. GIN control in horses is traditionally based
on regular anthelmintic administration to horses at intervals determined by egg reappearance periods which are
likely affected by climatic conditions [15–18]. However,
the majority of equine owners/managers in Australia
usually follow a regular treatment interval of 6–8 weeks
without any estimation of faecal egg counts (FECs) or
consideration of seasonal variation [19]. The intensive
use of anthelmintics has driven in the emergence of GIN
populations resistant to all major classes of anthelmintics
used in Australia, including benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones and tetrahydropyrimidines [12, 18, 20–24].
Thus, a national survey of the prevalence of anthelmintic
resistance (AR) in Australian horses is required for the
effective control and management of equine nematodes.
Page 2 of 16
The aim of this article is to provide: (i) a systematic
overview of the existing knowledge on the epidemiology,
pathology and diagnosis of equine GINs in Australia; (ii)
a thorough analysis of anthelmintic options and AR present in GINs infecting Australian horses; and (iii) areas
for future research that could fill current knowledge
gaps and enhance our understanding of equine GINs in
Australia.
Methods
The systematic review was conducted according to the
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (see Additional
file 1: Tabl (...truncated)