Energy in Physics and in Economy

Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 3(2), 44-58, 2005 ENERGY IN PHYSICS AND IN ECONOMY Katalin Martinás Atomic Physics Department, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest, Hungary Conference paper Received: 21 November, 2005. Accepted: 1 December, 2005. SUMMARY In this paper the energy concept used in economic activity is investigated. It is not a “useful” part of physical energy, but an economically defined quantity. To reach this conclusion we first give a summary of the classification of the different concepts – all bearing the name energy. There are at least six distinct concepts to be distinguished. Three of them are scientific concepts to be differentiated. The physical (conserved) energy belongs to the realm of the first law, the energy as the ability to perform (physical, chemical) work belongs to the second law, the economic (biological) capacity for actions belongs to the (Darwinian Law). KEY WORDS energy, history, teaching, interdisciplinarity CLASSIFICATION PACS: 01.40.gb, 01.55.+b *Corresponding author, η: ; +36 1 2090 555 Ext 6360; Atomfizikai tanszek, ELTE, Pazmany Peter setany 1, 1117 Budapest, Hungary. Energy in physics and in economy INTRODUCTION Energy is a unifying concept that spans all the sciences, and is of fundamental importance in issues of social concern such as the environment and the use of fuel resources. Energy is well-known concept. Everybody has an understanding, and the majority has a well defined, contradiction free concept. As a physicist, I had a very clear notion, too. The starting of the interdisciplinary work on the relation of economics and thermodynamics lead to the realisation, that the energy concept of economists is different. The explanation was given by Veronika Poór [1] who said: “Energy is the quantity which is conserved in physics and which is consumed in biology.”, “That is why the physical and the biological energy are different quantities”. A systematic survey lead to the result that there are at least six different categories of the energy. All these energy concepts have some relations (historical or factual) with each other, but from scientific point of view, they are different concepts. ENERGIES IN THE XXI. CENTURY There are at least 6 different energy concepts, used in different parts of science or human activity, namely the metaphysical, the psychological, the conserved, the dissipative and the important (human) energies at last but not least we must mention the E1) ENERGY THE COLLOQUIAL OR THE ENERGIA The first meaning of the word energy in the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary: refers to the colloquial usage [2]: „Energy (STRENGTH) is the power and ability to be physically and mentally active.” Examples: “Since I started eating more healthily I've got so much more energy. I was going to go out this evening, but I just haven't got the energy. I didn't even have the energy to get out of bed. Her writing is full of passion and energy (= enthusiasm). I'm going to channel all my energies into getting a better job. I tried aerobics but it was too energetic for me. I felt very energized after my holiday.” It is clear, that this energy concept does not coincide with the energy of physics. We argue, that this meaning refers to the original Aristotelian concept. “Energeia”, which is the root of our word energy, was created by Aristotle. It is generally translated as “activity.” However, it is not necessarily an activity in the sense that we might understand it. For instance, Aristotle describes both happiness and contemplation as activities. In calling happiness an energeia, Aristotle contrasts it with virtue, which he considers to be a hexis, or disposition. That is, the virtues dispose us to behave in the correct manner. Actually behaving according to the virtues, however, is not itself a virtue but rather the energeia of happiness” [3]. By Aristotle the proper function of man is [4] is “activity of the soul in conformity with reason (psuches energeia kata logon) (1098a7)”. In the Poetics the word energeia, for Aristotle, refers to the paradox of producing a powerful lifelike effect through words. In ordinary English, the word energy first appears in the 16th century. For Elizabethans, energy means the vigor of an utterance, the force of an expression, always the quality of a personal presence. A hundred years later the word can qualify an impersonal impact: the power of an argument or the ability of church music to generate an effect in the soul. The term is still used exclusively for psychic effects, although only for those engendered by either 45 K. Martinás a person or a thing. It is the colloquial energy. The online etymological dictionary [5] gives: “energy: 1599, from M.Fr. energie, from L.L. energia, from Gk. energeia ‘activity, operation,’ from energos ‘active, working,’ from en- ‘at’ + ergon ‘work’ (see urge (v.)).” Used by Aristotle with a sense of “force of expression;” broader meaning of “power” is first recorded in Eng. 1665. Energise “rouse to activity” is from 1753; energetic of persons, institutions, etc., is from 1796. Energy crisis first attested 1970.” Crease wrote [6]: “As late as 1842 the Encyclopedia Britannica only gave the word the briefest of entries: ‘ENERGY, a term of Greek origin, signifying the power, virtue, or efficacy of a thing. It is also used figuratively, to denote emphasis of speech.’” This energy concept is present nowadays, too, as the ability to perform an action. This energy has the property that it can be lost and can be created. There were many attempts to find the interpretation of Aristotelian energeia in physics, see as for instance [7, 8], that is to establish the relation between energeia and the energy of modern physics. Nevertheless, they are distinct concepts, and there are only some metaphoric links. E2) METAPHYSICAL ENERGY - ENERGY AS ARCHETYPE The ‘metaphysical energy’ is rather well-spread not only among physicists.. The universe of the contemporary physicist is a world of material objects, and of energy. Matter and energy have been unified by relativity theory into a single substance, ‘mass-energy’. Space and time have been unified, also by relativity theory, into a single 4-dimensional entity, ‘space-time’. Thus, the modern physicist sees a universe that is quite simple and elegant: mass-energy (in various forms) moving through space-time. This was clearly Einstein’s view: “Matter which we perceive is merely nothing but a great concentration of energy in very small regions. We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense … There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter for field (i.e. energy) is the only reality.” (cited in [9]). The distinction between mass and energy is considered as artificial. Eddington wrote[10]: “it seems very probable that mass and energy are two ways of measuring what is essentially the same thing, in the same s (...truncated)