What is the Trade-Off: Are New Trade Deals Worth the Changes to Pharmaceutical Patents?

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Oct 2020

None.

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=iplr

What is the Trade-Off: Are New Trade Deals Worth the Changes to Pharmaceutical Patents?

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 5 Winter 2020 What is the Trade-Off: Are New Trade Deals Worth the Changes to Pharmaceutical Patents? Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Kaitlyn Carter, What is the Trade-Off: Are New Trade Deals Worth the Changes to Pharmaceutical Patents?, 24 Marq. Intellectual Property L. Rev. 1 (2020) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review by an authorized editor of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact . CARTER_FINAL_MACROED (DO NOT DELETE) 8/11/20 12:22 PM WHAT IS THE TRADE-OFF: ARE NEW TRADE DEALS WORTH THE CHANGES TO PHARMACEUTICAL PATENTS? KAITLYN CARTER* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 53 II. PROMISES MADE ......................................................................................... 55 III. PROMISES IN PLACE? ................................................................................. 57 IV. HOW TO RECONCILE THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN PROMISES MADE AND PROMISES KEPT? .................................................................................. 62 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................... 65 I. INTRODUCTION Intellectual property provisions are standard when it comes to trade agreements. 1 Trade agreements and intellectual property standards are advanced together because intellectual property standards are said fair competition and provide for adequate and effective protection and enforcement, thus eliminating a major trade barrier. 2 During his presidential campaign, President Trump named fair trade deals and pharmaceutical drug pricing, among others, as his priorities during his presidency. 3 Initially, the President named intellectual property as one of the driving forces behind his trade negotiations, focusing his concern on protecting the intellectual property produced by the citizens of the United States from foreign countries’ fraudulent behavior. 4 President Trump has also promised to *J.D. Candidate, Class of 2020, Marquette University Law School. I would like to thank my parents for their constant support during my time in law school. 1. See James M. Silbermann, The North American Free Trade Agreement’s Effect on Pharmaceutical Patents: A bitter Pill to Swallow or a Therapeutic Solution?, 12 J. Contem. Health L. & Pol’y 607, 608 (1996). 2. See Id. 3. See President Donald Trump, State of the Union Address, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-201800064/pdf/DCPD-201800064.pdf, (Jan. 30, 2018). 4. Executive Summary from Ambassador Robert E. Lighthizer, The President’s 2018 Trade Policy Agenda, https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Reports/2018/AR/2018%20Annual%20Report%20I.pdf (Mar. 2018). [hereinafter The President’s 2018 Trade Policy Agenda}. CARTER (DO NOT DELETE) 54 8/11/20 12:22 PM MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. [Vol. 24:1 lower pharmaceutical prices for Americans. In 2018 the United States spent an estimated 335 billion on pharmaceutical drugs, this number is anticipated to grow to 345.7 billion by the end of 2019 and 358.7 billion by the end of 2020.5 This level of spending makes the United States the top spender on pharmaceuticals in the world. 6 Because of this, President Trump has made the promise to lower the price of pharmaceutical spending. 7 Throughout his presidency, President Trump has sought to deliver on his campaign promises, by drastically changing the United States’ presence in numerous trade deals. 8 He has accomplished this through withdrawing from current trade deals, renegotiating others, and forming new trade deals altogether. 9 A major withdrawal came within the first day of his term when he withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement. 10 Another notable change was the abandonment of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the negotiation of its replacement, the United StatesMexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). 11 Given this change, President Trump has also played an outsized role in changing intellectual property law since trade agreements may have a subsidiary effect of changing substantive nature. 12 For example, the USMCA included sixty-five pages of intellectual property provisions, that expanded provisions previously included in agreements, such as TPP and NAFTA. 13 Indeed, it may be that President Trump’s intellectual property goals—such as lower prescription drug prices—might be undermined by the ripple effects of his agreement. Section one of this Comment will analyze the promises President Trump has made during his term, focusing on trade reform and pharmaceutical drug prices. Section two of this Comment will demonstrate the disparity between 5. Prescription Drug Expenditure in the U.S. 1960-2019, SATISTA.COM (2019), https://www.statista.com/statistics/184914/prescription-drug-expenditures-in-the-us-since-1960/. 6. National Trends in Per Capita Pharmaceutical Spending, 1980-2015, COMMONWEALTHFUND.ORG, (2015), https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/files/documents/___media_files_publications_issu e_brief_2017_oct_pdf_sarnak_paying_for_rx_exhibits.pdf. 7. State of the Union Address, supra note 3. 8. See President Donald Trump, President Trump’s First Weekly Address, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-201700078/pdf/DCPD-201700078.pdf, (Jan. 28, 2017). 9. The President’s 2018 Trade Policy Agenda, supra note 4. 10. President Donald Trump, President Trump’s First Weekly Address, supra note 6. 11. U.S-Mex.-Can. Agreement, §20, Proposed Draft, Nov. 30, 2018. [https://perma.cc/M3YZ974N]. 12. See Marney L. Cheek, The Limits of Informal Regulatory Cooperation in International Affairs: A Review of the Global Intellectual Property Regime, 33 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 277, 283 (2001). 13. U.S-Mex.-Can. Agreement, §20, Dec. 13, 2019. CARTER_FINAL_MACROED (DO NOT DELETE) 2020] 8/11/20 12:22 PM TRADE DEALS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PATENTS 55 the promises made and the proposed provisions of the USMCA. Further, showing how the lack of intellectual property expertise during trade negotiations will prevent President Trump from fulfilling his promise to lower pharmaceutical drug prices. Finally, section three of this Comment will argue in favor of mandating that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) be present during trade negotiations, in hopes of, in the future, being able to accomplish goals for trade without negatively impacting consumers through intellectual property changes. II. PROMISES MADE Every presidential candidate makes promises and sets goals fo (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=iplr
Article home page: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol24/iss1/5

What is the Trade-Off: Are New Trade Deals Worth the Changes to Pharmaceutical Patents?, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2020, pp. 53, Volume 24, Issue 1,