OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF A CONVENTIONAL TWO-COMPARTMENT BALL MILL GRINDING CIRCUIT AT DIFFERENT CEMENT PRODUCTIONS
Madencilik, 2018, 57(2), 125-133
Mining, 2018, 57(2), 125-133
Orijinal Araştırma / Original Research
OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF A CONVENTIONAL TWO-COMPARTMENT
BALL MILL GRINDING CIRCUIT AT DIFFERENT CEMENT PRODUCTIONS
KONVANSİYONEL İKİ KAMARALI BİLYALI DEĞİRMEN ÖĞÜTME DEVRESİNİN
FARKLI ÇİMENTO ÜRETİMLERİNDE İŞLETME PERFORMANSI
Ömürden Gença,*, A.Hakan Benzerb,**
a
b
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Mining Engineering Department, Muğla, TURKEY
Hacettepe University, Mining Engineering Department, Ankara, TURKEY
Geliş Tarihi / Received
: 27 Kasım / November 2017
Kabul Tarihi / Accepted
: 19 Şubat / February 2018
ABSTRACT
Keywords:
Grinding,
Ball mill,
Air classifier,
Cement,
Energy.
Anahtar Sözcükler:
Öğütme,
Bilyalı değirmen,
Havalı sınıflandırıcı,
Çimento,
Enerji.
The purpose of the study is to assess the grinding and classification performance of a
conventional Polysius® two-compartment ball mill and a Sepol® dynamic air classifier closed
circuit process at Portland CEMI/42.5R and Portland composite CEMII/32.5R cement production
types. For this purpose, industrial scale sampling surveys were performed around the circuit.
JKSimMet Steady State Mineral Processing Software was used to perform mass balance around
the circuits. Size reduction performance of the ball mill was determined for the sampling cases.
Classification performance of the dynamic air classifier was evaluated based on the efficiency
curve approach. It was determined that, approximately 12% circuit capacity increase could be
achieved in composite cement production when ball mill, ball mill filter and air classifier power
consumptions were considered. This figure corresponded to overall energy savings of 7% in ball
mill grinding.
ÖZ
Bu çalışmanın amacı, konvansiyonel Polysius® iki kamaralı bilyalı değirmen ve Sepol® dinamik
havalı sınıflandırıcı kapalı devre işleminin Portland CEMI/42.5R ve Portland kompoze CEMII/32.5R
çimento üretimlerinde öğütme ve sınıflandırma performanslarının değerlendirilmesidir. Bu
amaçla, devre etrafında endüstriyel örnekleme çalışmaları yürütülmüştür. JKSimMet Cevher
Hazırlama Yazılımı ile devre etrafında madde denkliği yapılmıştır. Bilyalı değirmenin boyut
küçültme performansı örnekleme dönemleri için belirlenmiştir. Dinamik havalı sınıflandırıcının
sınıflandırma performansı verimlilik eğrisi yaklaşımına göre değerlendirilmiştir. Bilyalı değirmen,
bilyalı değirmen filtresi ve havalı sınıflandırıcı enerji tüketimleri düşünüldüğünde, kompoze
çimento üretiminde devre kapasitesinde yaklaşık olarak %12’lik bir artış sağlanabilmektedir. Bu
değer, bilyalı değirmen öğütmesinde %7’lik bir enerji tasarrufuna karşılık gelmektedir.
* Sorumlu yazar: • https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-1425
** • https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-5175
125
Ö. Genç, A.Hakan Benzer / Scientific Mining Journal, 2018, 57(2), 125-133
INTRODUCTION
World’s cement production was recorded to
be 4200000 million ton/year and Turkey has a
share of 77000 ton/year. Turkey is ranking in the
4th row within the countries producing cement
in the world (United States Geological Survey,
2016). The cement industry is energy intensive
which consumes approximately 12-15% of total
industrial energy use (Madlool et.al., 2011).
Finish grinding of cement requires approximately
40% of the total electrical energy consumed in
a cement plant (Norholm, 1995). In this respect,
energy efficiency of finish grinding stage will
save significant amount of energy. Thus, ways
to improve cement grinding efficiency should be
searched out. Useful insights could be obtained
from industrial scale applications and production
efficiencies for energy saving or more energy
efficient production rates (Benzer, et.al., 2001;
Genç et.al., 2006; 2008; Aydoğan and Benzer,
2011; Dundar et.al., 2011; Genç and Benzer,
2012; 2016).
In this study, production performance and
energy consumptions of industrial cement
grinding circuit were analysed when CEMI/42.5R
type Portland and CEMII/32.5R type Portland
composite cements were produced in the circuits.
It was demonstrated that, CEM II type Portland
composite cement production provided overall
energy savings of 7% with the applied circuit flow
configuration.
1. MATERIALS AND METHODS
1.1. Materials
CEMI/42.5R Portland cement was obtained by
grinding Portland cement clinker and mineral
additive material gypsum (CaSO4:2H2O). Portland
cement clinker is a black nodular hydraulic
material, made by burning in a rotary kiln
(pyroprocessing), at least to sintering a precisely
specified mixture of raw materials containing CaO,
SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 at temperatures of about
1400oC (Hewlett ,2010). Portland composite
cement (CEMII/32.5R) was obtained by grinding
clinker, gypsum and natural puzzolanic material
which is called trass. Pozzolana is a siliceous
and aluminous material that contains volcanic
material such as pumice or volcanic ash. Trass
126
effects several properties of cement mortar and
cement clinker significantly such as strength,
setting time, the amount of C3S (3CaO.SiO2) (alite
mineral) and durability, depending on the their
substitution ratio and fineness. In the investigated
circuit, fly ash was added to air classifier feed
stream directly due to its fineness in Portland
composite cement (CEMII/32.5R) production
case. Fly ash is a puzzolanic material and it is
a by-product of burning pulverized coal in an
electrical generating power station. It is collected
from the exhaust gases by mechanical and
electrostatic precipitators. It improves the longterm strength and reduces the permeability of the
concrete (Thomas, 2007).
1.2. Plant-site Studies
Figure 1 shows the circuit flowsheet with the
sampling points for the (CEMI/42.5R) Portland
cement production case. Polysius® twocompartment ball mill and a Polysius® Sepol®
dynamic high efficiency air classifier were
operated in closed circuit to obtain the required
cement types.
Figure 1. Simplified flowsheet of the industrial scale
cement production circuit
Sampling points correspond to the following
streams in Figure 1:
(1) Clinker feed
(2) Gypsum feed
(3) Total fresh feed
(4) Mill overflow
(5) Filter return
(6) Air classifier (separator) feed
(7) Air classifier reject
(8) Air classifier fine
(9) Trass (in composite cement production)
(10) Fly ash (in composite cement production)
Ö. Genç, A.Hakan Benzer / Bilimsel Madencilik Dergisi, 2018, 57(2), 125-133
Sampling surveys at the cement plant were
performed to characterize particle size
distributions around the circuits and inside the
mills at the steady state conditions at Portland
cement (CEMI/42.5R) and Portland composite
cement (CEMII/32.5R) production types.
Design specifications for the ball mill and air
classifier are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2. An
electrofilter at the discharge of the mill collects fine
particles (100% -212µm in CEMI production and
100% -850µm in CEMII production) from the mill
by air sweeping. The circuit was operated without
grinding aid in survey-1. However, grinding aid
was (...truncated)