Distant embolisation in infective endocarditis: characteristics and outcomes
Original Article
Neth Heart J
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01771-6
Distant embolisation in infective endocarditis:
characteristics and outcomes
Mariëlle G. J. Duffels · Tjeerd Germans · Annet Bos-Schaap · Olivier Drexhage · Jiri F. P. Wagenaar · Friso M. van
der Zant · Martine Hoogewerf · Remco J. J. Knol · Victor A. W. M. Umans
Accepted: 2 February 2023
© The Author(s) 2023
Abstract
Background Infective endocarditis is a severe and potentially lethal cardiac disease. Recognition of the
clinical features of endocarditis, such as distant embolisation, and adequate treatment should be initiated promptly given the grim perspective of upcoming
virulent pathogens.
Methods We report on our registry-based experience
with outcomes of consecutive patients with infective
endocarditis with distant embolisation. We aimed
to describe the patient characteristics of infective
endocarditis complicated by distant organ embolisation and the safety aspects of continuing endocarditis
treatment at home in these patients.
Results From November 2018 through April 2022,
157 consecutive patients were diagnosed with infective endocarditis. Of them, 38 patients (24%) experienced distant embolisation, either in the cerebrum
(n = 18), a visceral organ (n = 5), the lungs (n = 7) or the
myocardium (n = 8). Pathogens identified in blood
cultures were predominantly streptococcal variants
(43%), with only one culture-negative endocarditis
case. Of the 18 patients with cerebral embolisation,
M. G. J. Duffels · T. Germans · A. Bos-Schaap · O. Drexhage ·
V. A. W. M. Umans ()
Department of Cardiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The
Netherlands
J. F. P. Wagenaar
Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwest Clinics,
Alkmaar, The Netherlands
F. M. van der Zant · R. J. J. Knol
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics,
Alkmaar, The Netherlands
M. Hoogewerf
Department of Medical Microbiology, Northwest Clinics,
Alkmaar, The Netherlands
12 had neurological complaints and most often discrete abnormal findings on neurological examination.
Six of the 8 cardiac embolism patients experienced
chest pain before admission. Visceral organ and pulmonary embolism occurred silently. Of the 38 patients
with distant embolisation, 17 could be discharged earlier by providing antibiotic treatment at home without
complications.
Conclusion This registry-based single-centre experience showed an incidence of distant embolisation in
daily care of 24%. Cerebral and coronary embolisation
provoked symptoms, while visceral emboli remained
silent. Pulmonary emboli may present with inflammatory signs. Distant embolisation was not in itself
a contra-indication for outpatient endocarditis@home
treatment.
What’s new?
This registry-based, single-centre experience
showed an incidence of distant embolisation in
a non-referral hospital of 24%.
With regard to the occurrence of distant embolisation, there are three important aspects: it may
establish the diagnosis of endocarditis, impact
clinical decision-making and affect the clinical
and inflammatory course of the disease.
Patients with distant organ embolic events may
be seen at the internal medicine, orthopaedics or
neurology department with localised symptoms
and a common denominator of positive blood
cultures while being febrile or septic.
Outpatient intravenous antibiotic treatment is
also feasible for recovering patients with distant
organ embolisation and may warrant adjustment
of the guidelines.
Distant embolisation in infective endocarditis
Original Article
Keywords Infective endocarditis · Embolisation ·
Imaging · Clinical cardiology
Introduction
Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac disease
with a potential fatal clinical course [1, 2]. The natural course of endocarditis has changed, with different
pathogens and patient characteristics [1, 3–5]. The incidence has been reported to increase over time, with
a rise in more virulent microorganisms in earlier studies [3–5]. The prevalence of infective endocarditis is
estimated to be 3–10 per 100,000 inhabitants.
Although several patient groups at risk have been
identified, i.e. patients with mechanical cardiac valves
or cardiovascular implantable devices, the majority
of endocarditis patients are non-high-risk patients [3,
6]. However, recognition and treatment of endocarditis have become more sophisticated, and adequate
treatment should be initiated promptly given the grim
perspective of upcoming virulent pathogens. This is
even more apparent in patients with distant embolic
events either at presentation or during the course of
their treatment because this requires more sophisticated recognition and treatment [5–9]. Such patients
may be seen, for example, at the internal medicine,
orthopaedics or neurology department with localised
symptoms and a common denominator of positive
blood cultures while being febrile [10–13]. A multidisciplinary approach should entail an imminent multiimaging workup and the start of effective and culturedriven antibiotic therapy.
We aimed to describe the patient characteristics of
infective endocarditis complicated by distant organ
embolisation in a non-surgical hospital. Additionally,
we provide information on the safety aspects of continuing endocarditis treatment at home in these patients.
Methods
Patient population
From November 2018 through April 2022, all patients with suspected endocarditis were presented at
the weekly Endocarditis Team meeting at Northwest
Clinics in Alkmaar, the Netherlands. Confirmation
or rejection of the diagnosis of infective endocarditis was based on clinical presentation, blood culture
sampling and multimodality imaging. All consecutive
patients with a confirmed diagnosis were prospectively followed and constituted the patient cohort.
Infective endocarditis was defined according to the
2015 European Society for Cardiology (ESC) modified
diagnostic criteria [1]. Multimodality imaging included transthoracic echocardiography and/or transoesophageal echocardiography. When indicated,
18
F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (n = 91)
Distant embolisation in infective endocarditis
or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 8)
was performed.
Embolic events were defined as (sub)clinical wedgeshaped lesions shown on any imaging modality. These
were subdivided into cardiac, pulmonal, visceral organ and cerebral embolisms.
Endocarditis team
Endocarditis presentations may result in admissions
and treatments by medical specialists from diverse
disciplines, which often delays the diagnosis and the
initiation of optimal therapy. We therefore formed the
Alkmaar Endocarditis Team in accordance with the
ESC Guidelines [1]. In Endocarditis Team meetings,
we discuss the following patient groups: (a) patients in
whom the diagnosis is not yet confirmed and (b) patients with a stable clinical course while on appropriate antibiotic treatment. The team, with in-person
expertise of (imaging) cardiologists, in (...truncated)