Application of energy spilling mechanism by para-nitrophenol in biological excess sludge reduction in batch-activated sludge reactor
Takdastan and Eslami International Journal of Energy and
Environmental Engineering 2013, 4:26
http://www.journal-ijeee.com/content/4/1/26
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Open Access
Application of energy spilling mechanism by
para-nitrophenol in biological excess sludge
reduction in batch-activated sludge reactor
Afshin Takdastan1* and Azadeh Eslami2
Abstract
Reduction of biomass production coefficient is an ideal solution for the reduction of excess sludge especially in
industrial wastewater treatment plants. Studies were carried out in two sequencing batch reactors, which were
controlled online. After presenting a stable situation in reactors, during 24 months of the study, sampling and
examining of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand, pH, sludge volume index (SVI),
specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), remaining pNP, and biomass yield (Y) were implemented.
Results have shown that among different retention times (5, 10, 15, 25 days), maximum COD removal efficiency
(95%) was achieved in 10 days, without bulking and foaming problems. In 10 days of sludge retention time,
average Y and kinetic coefficient (Kd) were calculated: 0.58 mg biomass/mg COD and 0.058 1/day, respectively,
and correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.98. Different concentration of pNP were used due to energy spilling effect in
the reactor and the results show that injection of 100 mg/L pNP to the reactor can reduce synthetic coefficient Y
from 0.58 to 0.27 mg biomass/mg COD without pNP injection, so that the excess sludge was reduced by 0.56%.
Although, an increase of 193 mg/L soluble COD in the effluent was observed. On the other hand, in this
concentration of pNP, SOUR rate reached 31 mg O2/h/g volatile suspended solids, and SVI rate reached less than
48 mL/g. In the concentration of 150 mg/L pNP, no sludge was produced, but COD rate of the effluent increased
to 480 mg/L. Otherwise, pNP rate is an environmental limitation in effluent and sludge disposal.
Keywords: Sequencing batch reactor; Biological sludge; Biomass yield; COD; Para-nitrophenol
Background
Removal of organic materials by biological oxidation is a
core technology in wastewater treatment process. New
cells (sludge), carbon dioxide, soluble microbial products,
and water are the end products for this process. The activated sludge process is widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment and generates a large
quantity of excess sludge daily. So far, the ultimate disposal
of excess sludge has been and continues to be one of the
most expensive problems faced by wastewater utilities,
e.g., the treatment of the excess sludge may account for up
to 65% of the total plant operation cost. So in recent years,
* Correspondence:
1
Department of Environmental Health and Environmental Technology
Research Centre, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz,
Iran
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
increased attention has been given to the minimization of
waste sludge in wastewater treatment process [1-6].
Reduction of biomass production in wastewater treatment was discussed when costs and difficulties of treatment and disposal of the sludge were considered. On the
other hand, new rules and severe standards of reuse and
disposal of the sludge about different organic and inorganic pollutants and pathogens forced wastewater treatment experts to invent aerated biological treatment
methods which produce less sludge amount. In other
words, if the problem of excess sludge production is
solved, most of the problems would also be solved considerably in the treatment and disposal of the biomass [7,8].
Due to severe problems and heavy costs of operations of
sludge treatment, mechanisms of biomass reduction were
considered in the recent years. A collection of effective determinations in this field are:
© 2013 Takdastan and Eslami; lincensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Takdastan and Eslami International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering 2013, 4:26
http://www.journal-ijeee.com/content/4/1/26
– Self-destructive process [9-12]
– Uncoupled metabolism using OSA process [5,12-18]
– Increasing soluble oxygen of aeration pond [19]
– Oxidation of a part of sludge by chlorine or ozone
[2,5,7,8,18,20-23]
– Increasing temperature in returned sludge to the
reactor [6,24-26]
– Energy spilling by compounds resistant to
degradation and toxicant [3-5,17,27-30]
– pH changes [11,24]
– Using electrical pulse in returned sludge [31]
– Using ultrasonic waves in returned sludge [32]
– Using bacteriophages such as protozoa and
metazoan [33,34]
For most of the aerobic bacteria, adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) is generated by oxidative phosphorylation,
in which process electrons are transported through the
electron transport system from a source of electrons at
elevated energy levels (substrate) to a final electron acceptor (oxygen). The chemiosmotic theory shows that
the oxidative phosphorylation is driven by proton gradient built up across cell membrane [11]. However,
the tight coupling of respiration and phosphorylation
can be disturbed by molecules known as metabolic
uncouplers. In the presence of metabolic uncouplers,
the energy generated from the oxidation of organic
substrate would be lost as heat rather than being captured in ATP. As a result, the growth efficiency is
much lowered in uncoupler-containing microbial culture. Metabolic uncouplers include a diverse group of
molecule-structures, but they are all lipophilic weak
acids [5,29,35,36] many of which have been used to reduce excess sludge production from the activated sludge
processes, such as nitrophenol, chlorophenol, 3;3′,4′,5tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS), 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (TCP),
carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone,
cresol, aminophenol, and so on [3,4,20,27-29,37,38].
In 1998, Mayhew and colleagues found that injecting
35 mg/L of 2,4 dinitrophenol to the activated sludge reactor in 20°C, 0.3 mg mixed-liquor suspended solids
(MLSS)/g chemical oxygen demand (COD) in pH = 7,
and 2.5 g/L MLSS, sludge retention time (SRT) = 15
Figure 1 Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) pilot plant.
Page 2 of 7
days and hydraulic retention time (HRT) = 5.5 h can reduce biological excess sludge, but the only problem is a
3.7% COD increase in the effluent [38]. In 1998, Low
et al., found that continuous injection of 100 mg/L paranitrophenol (pNP) to a culture media containing
pseudomonas at 30°C and pH = 6.2 to 7 can reduce biological excess sludge from 62% to 70% [28]. In 1999,
Strand and colleagues found that a 2 to 2.5 mg/L increase of TCP to the activated sludge continuously cultivated at 20°C and pH = 7, MLSS = 2.5 g/L, SRT = 5
days, HRT = 3.5 h can reduce biological excess sludge
a (...truncated)