Directional cloning of DNA fragments using deoxyinosine-containing oligonucleotides and endonuclease V
Tobias Baumann
Katja M Arndt
Kristian M Mller
0
0
Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
,
Room UHG E2-143 Universitatsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615
,
Germany
Background: DNA fragments carrying internal recognition sites for the restriction endonucleases intended for cloning into a target plasmid pose a challenge for conventional cloning. Results: A method for directional insertion of DNA fragments into plasmid vectors has been developed. The target sequence is amplified from a template DNA sample by PCR using two oligonucleotides each containing a single deoxyinosine base at the third position from the 5 end. Treatment of such PCR products with endonuclease V generates 3 protruding ends suitable for ligation with vector fragments created by conventional restriction endonuclease reactions. Conclusions: The developed approach generates terminal cohesive ends without the use of Type II restriction endonucleases, and is thus independent from the DNA sequence. Due to PCR amplification, minimal amounts of template DNA are required. Using the robust Taq enzyme or a proofreading Pfu DNA polymerase mutant, the method is applicable to a broad range of insert sequences. Appropriate primer design enables direct incorporation of terminal DNA sequence modifications such as tag addition, insertions, deletions and mutations into the cloning strategy. Further, the restriction sites of the target plasmid can be either retained or removed.
-
Background
With hundreds of enzymes commercially available today
[1], restriction endonuclease treatment of insert and
plasmid vector DNA followed by ligation and transformation
into competent E. coli strains presents the standard cloning
method in molecular biology. Given the advances in
structural biology and the advent of synthetic biology, a strong
demand exists to transfer and rearrange a large variety of
DNA fragments from different genetic sources in a directed
manner. A diverse catalogue of plasmid vectors is at hand
for propagation in pro- and eukaryotic cells, enabling
heterologous protein expression in various host organisms.
Frequently, suitable pairs of Type II restriction enzymes
with unique recognition sites in the vector and insert DNA
fragments can be found, especially since the latter are easily
produced via PCR. In such a case, the PCR primers contain
add-on tails composed of the restriction endonuclease
recognition sequence and additional nucleotides which
ensure efficient enzymatic processing [2]. Especially with
an increasing size of the insert, however, the chance rises
that it contains a recognition site of the desired restriction
enzymes. Statistically, the 6 bp recognition sequence of a
Type II restriction enzyme such as XbaI would occur once
in every 46 / 2 = 2048 base pairs. The situation gets worse if
one aims to insert multiple sequences in dual-expression
vectors, as for instance required for co-expression studies
in metabolic engineering, structural and synthetic biology
[3-6]. These circumstances require purchase and storage
of numerous restriction enzymes or the execution of
site-directed mutagenesis (including design and synthesis/
purchase of mutagenic primers, high-fidelity PCR,
transformation and sequencing) [7,8] in order to remove the
unwanted recognition sites. Individual buffer and temperature
requirements for endonuclease stability and activity [9]
further limit the number of cloning options.
To eliminate the problems of conventional cloning,
methods avoiding the use of Type II restriction enzymes
have been developed. The Gateway cloning system relies
on site-specific recombination catalyzed by a proprietary
bacteriophage protein formulation in vitro [10]. Creation
of large recombinant DNA molecules can be achieved by
the domino method [11] and DNA assembler [12], which
are based on homologous recombination in vivo by the
machinery of B. subtilis or S. cerevisiae, respectively. The
endogenous recombination system of E. coli can combine
insert and vector molecules upon co-transfection [13,14],
which can be facilitated by expression of a homing
endonuclease and bacteriophage recombinases [15]. Similarly,
a cell lysate which contains a prophage recombination
system can be used in vitro [16]. PCR-based generation of
complete recombinant plasmids, preferably via a
proofreading DNA polymerase, can be achieved by several strategies
[17-21]. For the highly complex challenge of genome
engineering, homing nucleases [22], transcription activator
like (TAL) [23] and zinc-finger nucleases [24] can be used.
More similar to the conventional restriction-ligation
system, compatible cohesive ends can be generated in
alternative ways. Combined with a subsequent ligation
reaction that stabilizes the paired ends, exonuclease III [25]
or T4 DNA polymerase [26] can be used for their creation.
Ligation-independent cloning (LIC) [27] employs
longer overhangs resulting in sufficiently stable DNA base
pairing for transformation. These can be created by
several means, e.g. via T4 DNA polymerase or
incomplete PCR [27-29], hybridization of PCR products [30],
ribonucleotide-containing primers [31], terminal
transferase [32], abasic sites [33], chemical or enzymatic cleavage
of phosphorothioated DNA [34,35], or exonuclease [36].
Elegant enzyme-based in vitro systems have been
developed, such as In-Fusion cloning [37], for which the
polymerase is known but not the exact composition, as well as
the combined isothermal usage of a DNA polymerase, a
5 exonuclease and DNA ligase, named Gibson assembly
cloning [38]. Although several of the described cloning
systems with individual advantages and disadvantages are
commercially available, many present costly alternatives
or demand complex planning.
Smith et al. reported a method to create insert
fragments with 5 recessed ends via PCR, utilizing
deoxyuracilcontaining primers [39]. Treatment of the PCR products
with heat or alkaline solution creates 3 overhangs
compatible with those of the vector fragment. In a similar fashion,
USER friendly DNA cloning [40] utilizes a commercially
available enzyme mix. In contrast to uracil DNA glycosylase
(UDG) treatment, this enzyme mix removes the dU
residues instead of cleaving the N-glycosylic bond. Compatible
vectors are generated by treating the plasmid DNA with
a nicking and a Type II restriction endonuclease instead
of PCR-based amplification. As for other methods, this
strategy avoids the risk of introducing polymerase errors
into the plasmid backbone. Although cohesive ends can
also be generated by using DNA glycosylase-lyase Endo VIII
[41] or Endo IV [42] subsequent to UDG, we sought to
develop a more straightforward cloning method that requires
only one enzyme, no heat- or alkaline treatment and which
allows the creation of more 3 protruding end combinations
(see Figure 1 for those created in this study).
Unlike deoxyuracil, the universal base deoxyinosine (dI)
can pair with all four canonical DNA nuc (...truncated)